• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Jason and Andy get off your miserable high horses FGS...have a laugh for a change....
<<
<
2 of 5
>>
>
Cat-
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by sheils1:
“And Laura isnt a hypocrite ?”

Yeah she could well be along with many of them in there, but at least she knows how to have a laugh, have fun and let her hair down now and again.

Misery guts Jason only has one mode.
sheils1
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Cat-:
“It sure is fun to watch. But also needs a bit of level playing field too with all this Jason love-in stuff.

The guy is a misery guts up his own A- hole creep.”

Why? Because he dint want anything to eat, i didnt find him a misery guts, i thought him and Andy can laugh at the others when they get punished for breaking the rules.
Vesna
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by froja:
“it wasn't a 'collective descision'. Jason was right.”

It was their group decision. A majority of those on rations made the decision. Isn't that how they decided to get Chelsea out and give Andy immunity? Jason was being pedantic.

Originally Posted by Annsyre:
“It is a house punishment. They are going to be living on slops in future.”

And we all know, including them, how long these "punishments" last.

Shame the 2 miserable gits can't manage to lighten up.
BillyLagan
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Verence:
“Two contestants on a game show hoping to get to the final??? How very very DARE they!!”

Haha!
sheils1
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Cat-:
“Yeah she could well be along with many of them in there, but at least she knows how to have a laugh, have fun and let her hair down now and again.

Misery guts Jason only has one mode. ”

And hows that? oh by eating food that she wasnt suppose to? haha yeah i call that having fun.
Barracute
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Vesna:
“It was their group decision. A majority of those on rations made the decision. Isn't that how they decided to get Chelsea out and give Andy immunity? Jason was being pedantic.


And we all know, including them, how long these "punishments" last.

Shame the 2 miserable gits can't manage to lighten up.”

They were all present and agreed to go with the majority for those decisions, that didnt happen here and those decisions werent about breaking the rules either!
redcherry
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Dixon:
“It was hilarious seeing Jason taking the moral highground over hm's eating a handful of popcorn.
The daft arguments, twists and turns are making this such fun to watch.”

How true. I cannot believe the brass neck of Jason. He who took £20k from the winners prize money and he who evicted the popular housemate. Was that a collective decision? No. It was his alone Jayne and Charlie were right....he is the biggest gameplayer in there.
Cat-
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Vesna:
“It was their group decision. A majority of those on rations made the decision. Isn't that how they decided to get Chelsea out and give Andy immunity? Jason was being pedantic.


And we all know, including them, how long these "punishments" last.

Shame the 2 miserable gits can't manage to lighten up.”

Indeed Vesna.

I honestly had no problem with the eviction and Jason's decision etc. Seeing it in a game sense etc. But tonight just showed me just how self-righteous and hypocritical he is. It really annoyed me that the other hms are to be lambasted because they dared to have something this guy doesn't know the meaning off.................FUN!!

Bore off................you've got your twenty grand!
Barracute
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by redcherry:
“How true. I cannot believe the brass neck of Jason. He who took £20k from the winners prize money and he who evicted the popular housemate. Was that a collective decision? No. It was his alone Jayne and Charlie were right....he is the biggest gameplayer in there.”

1) he never claimed it was a collective decision?
2) he didnt break any rules
3) it happened in front of everyone
Fairy Wings
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by redcherry:
“How true. I cannot believe the brass neck of Jason. He who took £20k from the winners prize money and he who evicted the popular housemate. Was that a collective decision? No. It was his alone Jayne and Charlie were right....he is the biggest gameplayer in there.”

Someone HAD to take the £20k. The decision who to evict HAD to be his, or whoever else got to the button first. Not collective 😁
Selena
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Cat-:
“It really annoyed me that the other hms are to be lambasted because they dared to have something this guy doesn't know the meaning off.................FUN!!”

Wasn't that main group the ones whinging, whining and moaning about the situation though which is why they ate the food in the first place. They were just being greedy not having fun.
Rhumbatugger
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Vesna:
“It was their group decision. A majority of those on rations made the decision. Isn't that how they decided to get Chelsea out and give Andy immunity? Jason was being pedantic.


And we all know, including them, how long these "punishments" last.

Shame the 2 miserable gits can't manage to lighten up.”

No he wasn't being pedantic - Andy and Jason weren't even bloody AWARE it had happened.


And they accepted it - they can't stop them doing it and it's THEIR decision. All they wanted was for them to acknowledge it was THEIR decision - and that made the kids all angwy 'cos they'd feel all better about it if everyone did it and wouldn't have to take any bloody responsiblity for the punishment.

Tough tits.
Verence
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Selena:
“Wasn't that main group the ones whinging, whining and moaning about the situation though which is why they ate the food in the first place. They were just being greedy not having fun.”

They complained even more when they got punished
Rhumbatugger
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Selena:
“Wasn't that main group the ones whinging, whining and moaning about the situation though which is why they ate the food in the first place. They were just being greedy not having fun.”

Greedy and silly.


And Laura having a go at being the NEW Lateysha.
Cat-
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by redcherry:
“How true. I cannot believe the brass neck of Jason. He who took £20k from the winners prize money and he who evicted the popular housemate. Was that a collective decision? No. It was his alone Jayne and Charlie were right....he is the biggest gameplayer in there.”

I was never that interested in him or Charlie. I thought the two of them were boring. I don't even care about the gameplaying aspect of it. He pulled a cropper last night....so good on him, but he's still a dreary miserable fun sucker and bore that he's always been imo. Winning that money and evicting Lateshya hasn't changed my mind about what I see of his basic personality.
pattiflat
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Skyrah:
“sorry to burst your bubble, Jason ain't going no where on Friday ”

I dont think he will either skyrah
digiqueen
14-07-2016
Ffs how long had they been on basic rations. God help them if they had been in the original BB houses when they really were punished. Selfish, spoiled kids.
pattiflat
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by redcherry:
“How true. I cannot believe the brass neck of Jason. He who took £20k from the winners prize money and he who evicted the popular housemate. Was that a collective decision? No. It was his alone Jayne and Charlie were right....he is the biggest gameplayer in there.”

That couldnt be a collective decision.
Cat-
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by digiqueen:
“Ffs how long had they been on basic rations. God help them if they had been in the original BB houses when they really were punished. Selfish, spoiled kids.”

Oh c'mon the original hms would've ate everything going too if they had the chance. Are you forgetting the night when Kate, Spencer and co broke into the rich side and stole chocolate?

So same thing. The hms wanted to have fun and break rules. They did so.....and had the two mardy arses, Jason and Andy joined in, we wouldn't even be having these threads comparing their actions.
dullagj2
14-07-2016
Hear hear OP.

Andy loves going against the majority because he's so intelligent. *rolls eyes*

Jason is laughable. A forgettable dullard who robbed 20k from the winner who then proceeds to moan about them eating some food.
digiqueen
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Cat-:
“Oh c'mon the original hms would've ate everything going too if they had the chance. Are you forgetting the night when Kate, Spencer and co broke into the rich side and stole chocolate?

So same thi ng. The hms wanted to have fun and break rules. They did so.....and had the two mardy arses, Jason and Andy joined in, we wouldn't even be having these threads comparing their actions. ”

Yes, I remember them squeezing through the bars but the difference is that they took their punishment, they didn't squawk that it was unfair and they weren't doing it. I don't see why Jason and Andy should join in, they made their choice just as the 'children' made theirs. That's just my opinion.
boshealecta
14-07-2016
Eating the food was a bit of fun. Big Brother is fun when people are rebellious. They are so nervous and worried they are leaving. Make the most of it
jp761
14-07-2016
If you don't consult me you can eat my hat! Jason and Andy have a fair point in this situation.
Skyrah
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by redcherry:
“How true. I cannot believe the brass neck of Jason. He who took £20k from the winners prize money and he who evicted the popular housemate. Was that a collective decision? No. It was his alone Jayne and Charlie were right....he is the biggest gameplayer in there.”

sorry, your argument does not make sense at all

Jason WON the 20K from the prize fund in a TASK. I don't remember while BB reading out the rules they stated one must consult other HMs and ask approval before evicting a housemate
Verence
14-07-2016
Deleted
<<
<
2 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map