Well Well Well - Page 2 - Digital Spy Forums

Well Well Well

2 of 2

jeanoj

15-07-2016

Originally Posted by fisch:
“Its wrong because people are spending money on a vote to save so the H/M with the lowest votes should go.”

The bottom 3 are at risk though, no-one else so no different to a normal eviction. Some people would have voted to save the one who goes but I do sort of see your point.

flower 2

15-07-2016

Originally Posted by benbeez1:
“are they rivals to WET WET WET ”

Oy! what's going on ere then?

jeanoj

15-07-2016

Originally Posted by flower 2:
“It is up to the public to VOTE for Jason and Andy to save them from the housemates.”

Andy is immune - Rylan said so but I am voting for Jason - he HAS to stay!

jeanoj

15-07-2016

Originally Posted by flower 2:
“The 3 with the fewest public votes to save, go to, the housemates to vote on who leaves....”

and Emma will go into the house to tell them!

muggins14

15-07-2016

Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“and Emma will go into the house to tell them!”

Tell them who are the bottom 3 yes. Presumably she'll oversee their voting too.

atko

15-07-2016

Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“The bottom 3 are at risk though, no-one else so no different to a normal eviction. Some people would have voted to save the one who goes but I do sort of see your point.”

It's actually incorrect. It's only unfair on the public for a vote to evict. We have this conversation every year when they do something like this. A vote to evict means the majority might have voted to evict someone who the house then saves. That's wrong! That's why they always switch to vote to save....you can always expect some kind of twist like this when they change it!

strato222

15-07-2016

Originally Posted by muggins14:
“Tell them who are the bottom 3 yes. Presumably she'll oversee their voting too.”

I really hope they're asked to write a name down and say NOTHING else or they forfeit their vote. If not, Jackson 'cry baby' Blyton might go first and slip a few veiled threats in while giving his reason for his vote.

Aimee

15-07-2016

I definitely think people have been following like sheep, BUT I think that's been quite interesting to watch. (Nasty as that seems) it was likely fair to Chelsea, as he had more nominations last week than anyone anyway and was likely to again.

What I find interesting is that BB didn't tell them HOW to decide, BB just said decide. They made up their own boundaries; they could have done anything; drawn straws, played rock paper scissors etc.

For ONCE I actually am finding this week interesting from an 'experimental' point of view.

rhizo_mania

15-07-2016

Changes

Mani_Bhangra

15-07-2016

Originally Posted by flower 2:
“It is up to the public to VOTE for Jason and Andy to save them from the housemates.”

First of all, Andy is immune!
Second is not everyone wants Jason safe, including me but
Third is I'm not bothered who goes as its only a game show and the producers want the public to keep on voting their favourite person in case they might be in the bottom 3 and could be evicted so they can line their pockets with the voting money.
WHEN HAS CHANNEL 5 OR BB PRODUCERs EVER LISTENED TO THE VIEWER!!!

Alrightmate

15-07-2016

Originally Posted by atko:
“Yeah I didn't think this was anything new. I thought someone somewhere had already confirmed that the housemates would decide who goes. It is still hardly a massacre one person being evicted. Once again we are going to see the sheep decide with a live face to face anyway so it isn't going to be a shock eviction. When will they realize that face to face does nothing for the BB concept. It just means everyone follows everyone else!”

Exactly. It's the opposite of what most BB viewers actually want. We don't want the loudest most popular group in the house dictating who should be evicted.
Idiots.

yogacats

15-07-2016

Originally Posted by flower 2:
“It is up to the public to VOTE for Jason and Andy to save them from the housemates.”

Andy is immune.

2 of 2