DS Forums

 
 

Do Vote To Save & Vote To Evict Really Make A Huge Difference To The Outcome?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15-07-2016, 00:08
claremonts
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,735

I get why they are two different votes, but can someone please clearly explain the differences to me.
I wonder if I am missing something major here, or is it mainly that people feel the need to pick up to save someone rather than pick up to evict them? Any replies would be appreciated thanks (and try to be patient and pleasant please)!
claremonts is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 15-07-2016, 00:14
Celsius7
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 7
VTE benefits the quieter house mates; they have not given any/enough reasons for someone to pick up the phone to evict them. Therefore, quieter house mates are more likely to go in a VTS, as like VTE, they have not given someone enough reasons to pick up the phone to save them.
Celsius7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 00:23
smoggieboon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,056
I get why they are two different votes, but can someone please clearly explain the differences to me.
I wonder if I am missing something major here, or is it mainly that people feel the need to pick up to save someone rather than pick up to evict them? Any replies would be appreciated thanks (and try to be patient and pleasant please)!
I am of the opinion that people are more inclined to want someone out, rather than want someone in. The differences are to CH5s revenue. Take tomorrow night for example, you would've had to vote to evict the person who you disliked = 1 phone call. In a vote to save you would need to make 4 phone calls, to have the same effect as one vote to evict.
They must be running short of cash, it annoys the hell out of me when they use premium rate lines for voting, even more expensive lines for entering the competitions. All channels are guilty of this practice, and it stinks.
smoggieboon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 00:25
jeanoj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
I get why they are two different votes, but can someone please clearly explain the differences to me.
I wonder if I am missing something major here, or is it mainly that people feel the need to pick up to save someone rather than pick up to evict them? Any replies would be appreciated thanks (and try to be patient and pleasant please)!
If your favourite is a housemate that divides opinion - like Jason or Andy for instance, in a vote to evict they would be at risk because we would have to vote for all or many of the others to try and save them. In a vote to save, it is likely they would stay and the ones with little support would be more likely to go.
jeanoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 00:31
JVS
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8,737
I get why they are two different votes, but can someone please clearly explain the differences to me.
I wonder if I am missing something major here, or is it mainly that people feel the need to pick up to save someone rather than pick up to evict them? Any replies would be appreciated thanks (and try to be patient and pleasant please)!
In terms of telephone votes there is more money to be made by vote-to-evict because getting rid of someone you dislike is a more motivating factor.

With VTS the big personalities are more likely to be saved and the fence-sitters and radar dodgers are more likely to go.
JVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 00:34
atko
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,288
Yes because lets say most BB viewers disagreed with Jason taking the 20k so wanted him out. Not saying that is the case because I know it isn't but using this as an example. If it was vote to evict they would all simply vote him out. Mass votes on him....he's a gonna!!

For a vote to save though, everyone votes for their favorite of the ones who are nominated. Obviously as viewers we don't all have the same favorites so the votes are spread more even. A more even spread means that votes for all nominees, including Jason, are more closer meaning he is less likely to go!

A vote to save in theory should get rid of all the less popular housemates now, provided they get nominated in the first place!!
atko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 00:38
curnow
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 721
I get why they are two different votes, but can someone please clearly explain the differences to me.
I wonder if I am missing something major here, or is it mainly that people feel the need to pick up to save someone rather than pick up to evict them? Any replies would be appreciated thanks (and try to be patient and pleasant please)!
wish it was vote to evict & Jason would be gone

but with three going , vote to save is better , in BB11 they had vote to evict in final week & left all the boring ones with Josie , at least you can save your favourite
curnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 00:42
claremonts
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,735
Hi- Thanks to everyone who has replied so far, as you have all really clarified things for me, and i really do appreciate the time you have taken to post your comments!! 🙂👍🏻
claremonts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 00:45
jeanoj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
Hi- Thanks to everyone who has replied so far, as you have all really clarified things for me, and i really do appreciate the time you have taken to post your comments!! 🙂👍🏻
You are very welcome xx
jeanoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 00:46
jeanoj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
wish it was vote to evict & Jason would be gone

but with three going , vote to save is better , in BB11 they had vote to evict in final week & left all the boring ones with Josie , at least you can save your favourite
Only one is going. The housemates will choose one to go from the three with the lowest votes.
jeanoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 01:17
Salv*
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,845
Yes.

VTE favours quiet HMs. Sam would have no chance going in a VTE.

VTS favours those on screen.

Basically, if you appear a lot in the eviction show on a VTE, there is a much bigger chance you will be evicted.

If you appear a lot in the eviction show on a VTS, there is a big chance you'll stay.
Salv* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 02:09
Ronell_Davis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,149
It really does and it baffles that some people still dosen't see the massive difference it has ,
.
Ronell_Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2016, 02:22
Janette800
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Wales...Land of the Dragon
Posts: 11,430
BB will benefit by VTS....because if you want to save Jason Andy and Jackson you will vote 3 times...?BUT if it's VTE and you want Ryan out then you vote once..... it's all about the money which is why I don't VOTE
Janette800 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:32.