|
||||||||
Do Vote To Save & Vote To Evict Really Make A Huge Difference To The Outcome? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,736
|
Do Vote To Save & Vote To Evict Really Make A Huge Difference To The Outcome?
I get why they are two different votes, but can someone please clearly explain the differences to me.
I wonder if I am missing something major here, or is it mainly that people feel the need to pick up to save someone rather than pick up to evict them? Any replies would be appreciated thanks (and try to be patient and pleasant please)! |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 7
|
VTE benefits the quieter house mates; they have not given any/enough reasons for someone to pick up the phone to evict them. Therefore, quieter house mates are more likely to go in a VTS, as like VTE, they have not given someone enough reasons to pick up the phone to save them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,056
|
Quote:
I get why they are two different votes, but can someone please clearly explain the differences to me.
I wonder if I am missing something major here, or is it mainly that people feel the need to pick up to save someone rather than pick up to evict them? Any replies would be appreciated thanks (and try to be patient and pleasant please)! They must be running short of cash, it annoys the hell out of me when they use premium rate lines for voting, even more expensive lines for entering the competitions. All channels are guilty of this practice, and it stinks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
|
Quote:
I get why they are two different votes, but can someone please clearly explain the differences to me.
I wonder if I am missing something major here, or is it mainly that people feel the need to pick up to save someone rather than pick up to evict them? Any replies would be appreciated thanks (and try to be patient and pleasant please)! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8,739
|
Quote:
I get why they are two different votes, but can someone please clearly explain the differences to me.
I wonder if I am missing something major here, or is it mainly that people feel the need to pick up to save someone rather than pick up to evict them? Any replies would be appreciated thanks (and try to be patient and pleasant please)! With VTS the big personalities are more likely to be saved and the fence-sitters and radar dodgers are more likely to go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,288
|
Yes because lets say most BB viewers disagreed with Jason taking the 20k so wanted him out. Not saying that is the case because I know it isn't but using this as an example. If it was vote to evict they would all simply vote him out. Mass votes on him....he's a gonna!!
For a vote to save though, everyone votes for their favorite of the ones who are nominated. Obviously as viewers we don't all have the same favorites so the votes are spread more even. A more even spread means that votes for all nominees, including Jason, are more closer meaning he is less likely to go! A vote to save in theory should get rid of all the less popular housemates now, provided they get nominated in the first place!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 721
|
Quote:
I get why they are two different votes, but can someone please clearly explain the differences to me.
I wonder if I am missing something major here, or is it mainly that people feel the need to pick up to save someone rather than pick up to evict them? Any replies would be appreciated thanks (and try to be patient and pleasant please)! but with three going , vote to save is better , in BB11 they had vote to evict in final week & left all the boring ones with Josie , at least you can save your favourite |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,736
|
Hi- Thanks to everyone who has replied so far, as you have all really clarified things for me, and i really do appreciate the time you have taken to post your comments!! 🙂👍🏻
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
|
Quote:
Hi- Thanks to everyone who has replied so far, as you have all really clarified things for me, and i really do appreciate the time you have taken to post your comments!! 🙂👍🏻
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
|
Quote:
wish it was vote to evict & Jason would be gone
but with three going , vote to save is better , in BB11 they had vote to evict in final week & left all the boring ones with Josie , at least you can save your favourite |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,860
|
Yes.
VTE favours quiet HMs. Sam would have no chance going in a VTE. VTS favours those on screen. Basically, if you appear a lot in the eviction show on a VTE, there is a much bigger chance you will be evicted. If you appear a lot in the eviction show on a VTS, there is a big chance you'll stay. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,149
|
It really does and it baffles that some people still dosen't see the massive difference it has ,
. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Wales...Land of the Dragon
Posts: 11,430
|
BB will benefit by VTS....because if you want to save Jason Andy and Jackson you will vote 3 times...?BUT if it's VTE and you want Ryan out then you vote once..... it's all about the money which is why I don't VOTE
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:46.


