Originally Posted by
RobbieSykes123:
“Indeed. Remember "Fast Friends"? 
http://www.ukgameshows.com/ukgs/Fast_Friends
Don't know why BB bit the dust. It was still great as was Les right to the end.”
Fast Friends was commissioned with incredible haste, I think about three months after they bought the format it was on the telly, much to Les and the producer's displeasure as they were thrown straight into it without much time to think about it. I think it was a bit of a contractual obligation to Les.
I remember watching the final series of Blankety Blank, it was one of those shows, like The Roxy, where I watched it every week after I got a telly in my bedroom so I have fond memories of it (no staying up late to watch rude things for me, the best thing about having my own TV was watching light entertainment). But it was declining quite a bit, certainly watching Les banter with the likes of Gary Davies was a bit of a step down from the golden age of Tel and Kenny Everett.
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Thames and LWT used to argue over film premieres too. It was very petty between them.”
Yes, but of course the reason London had two ITV stations was to create competition in the system and stop one company dominating things to a huge extent, which on the face of it was good for the viewer. It meant ITV did have quality programming throughout the week, at least, because there would always be big drama and entertainment on weeknights. And as we've mentioned before, they would faithfully share out film premieres between the two, so Bond films would alternate between weekdays and weekends.
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“You can't ban drama on Tuesday's. ITV have done this basically for years and look where its got them. 1.8m at 8pm and 1.9m at 9pm. Not good enough.”
Well, yes, and I think the suggestions that certain nights are devoted to certain genres are a bit daft. It means you're commissioning stuff for the sake of it and to fill slots rather than considering what works best. And it makes schedules incredibly boring. There was a great example from ITV themselves in 2001 when they decided to make Monday the home of young-skewing comedy and drama, it lasted five weeks before they started worrying the ratings were dropping and started sticking Alright on the Night and Millionaire back there again.
Maybe Mondays are a good night for dramas, but that's because of the individual dramas, not because they become any better on a Monday. A flop drama will flop in any slot. And people don't turn into them because it's a Monday, nobody can remember what day anything is on, or when it was on last time round. People tune in because they like that particular programme. That's even more true now in the days of box sets and iPlayer when they could be watching it at any time.
A good slot can make the difference but it's not a question of blithely putting everything in one slot without any consideration of whether it's right for that slot or, indeed, what the other channels are doing. By this theory, because Wednesday was BBC1's weakest night a few years back, it would be just stuffed with cheap factual forever. Look what BBC1 are getting on Wednesdays now.
It's easy to come up with ideas for new schedules but the vast majority of scheduling involves avoiding what other channels are doing and working around sporting events and other things, so you can't have things set in stone. In addition, budgets mean that you do have to have several nights where you have to cobble together enough stuff to get you from teatime to bedtime without spending too much money. It's not for want of trying but you can't have blockbusters every night, there isn't the cash for it. Some nights are going to be weaker than others. And there has to be some kind of subjectivity to scheduling, otherwise it may as well be a railway timetable. Saying "If this is a drama it can only go in slots X, Y or Z" is trying to turn TV scheduling into an exact science, rather than actually considering what's best for the individual programme. If it was that easy to create a killer schedule, why aren't they doing it already?