Originally Posted by Jonwo:
“Didn't ITV Studios buy Big Talk? That would make it a subsidiary of ITV but correct me if I'm wrong.
Endeavour is made by Mammoth Screen rather than ITV Studios so clearly ITV has no issues as they distribute anyway, Tennison which is made by Noho and LaPlante Global has a similar arrangement.”
“Didn't ITV Studios buy Big Talk? That would make it a subsidiary of ITV but correct me if I'm wrong.
Endeavour is made by Mammoth Screen rather than ITV Studios so clearly ITV has no issues as they distribute anyway, Tennison which is made by Noho and LaPlante Global has a similar arrangement.”
Er, yes. What I was trying to suggest is that there is a difference between Shiver and Potato, which were existing ITV departments that have been spun off (Shiver is the old Yorkshire TV factual department, for example, and is still very much integrated into ITV) and companies like Big Talk which were existing companies which ITV bought and are operated at arm's length. If you see what I mean, Big Talk isn't just the ITV drama department with a label on it. It was a company that existed before ITV were involved.
Originally Posted by Jonwo:
“Panel shows have been the staple of British television for decades and that's not going to change and many are very good like WILTY, Mock the Week, Room 101 etc
I'm surprised given the success it's had in America that Whose Line it is Anyway? hasn't come back, it's had two successful run of the live shows in the West End and it's cheap to make. I think the creators have approached Channel 4 but they only want a one-off and not a series, maybe they should ask Channel 5 or Dave”
“Panel shows have been the staple of British television for decades and that's not going to change and many are very good like WILTY, Mock the Week, Room 101 etc
I'm surprised given the success it's had in America that Whose Line it is Anyway? hasn't come back, it's had two successful run of the live shows in the West End and it's cheap to make. I think the creators have approached Channel 4 but they only want a one-off and not a series, maybe they should ask Channel 5 or Dave”
Well, they did do a revival of Whose Line Is It Anyway on the BBC, but it wasn't called that, it was called Fast and Loose...
http://www.ukgameshows.com/ukgs/Fast_and_Loose
It was from the same production team as Whose Line, and was exactly the same format, but for whatever reason they decided they never wanted to mention that (even the press release said it was "from the creators of Mock The Week"). But it was identical. It was also not very good.
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“I remember that night well. I wasn't allowed to stay up to watch In Sickness and in Health, but I recorded the whole series onto VHS, and watched it many times.
Some of the language is quite jarring now, though. I know it was always said the racist words were there to make Alf look like an idiot, and how the other characters would show him up as an idiot, but watching the DVDs of all six series recently, I've noticed all the characters getting some throwaway racist lines at some point, so I can't help thinking some of the words were just thrown in to get cheap laughs.
Warren Mitchell was amazing in it. He put so much energy into every scene.”
“I remember that night well. I wasn't allowed to stay up to watch In Sickness and in Health, but I recorded the whole series onto VHS, and watched it many times.
Some of the language is quite jarring now, though. I know it was always said the racist words were there to make Alf look like an idiot, and how the other characters would show him up as an idiot, but watching the DVDs of all six series recently, I've noticed all the characters getting some throwaway racist lines at some point, so I can't help thinking some of the words were just thrown in to get cheap laughs.
Warren Mitchell was amazing in it. He put so much energy into every scene.”
I have always had a problem with Alf Garnett, I know the whole point of the series is that Alf is an idiot, but I always think he wins far too much. As one of the reviews of the revival the other week pointed out, Tony Booth's character is supposed to be the opposite of him, challenging his views, but he's an insufferable loudmouth as well, so you hate him too. And I just find the whole thing - whether Till Death or In Sickness And In Health - revolves so much around arguing and shouting and features so many repellent characters that it just becomes a total chore to watch. I know what Johnny Speight was trying to do and I admire him for doing it, but that doesn't mean I have to like the programme.
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“The Bill started out as a gritty 9pm drama, when it moved to 8pm it kept that spirit. But when it became more soap like it was ruined for me.”
“The Bill started out as a gritty 9pm drama, when it moved to 8pm it kept that spirit. But when it became more soap like it was ruined for me.”
Indeed, The Bill was of course a conventional 9pm drama before being revamped as a twice weekly year-round 8pm series. When they had the big revamp in 1998, when it went back to hour long episodes, it was all over the place for a bit, though, including a number of episodes at 9pm. Actually there was a period in 1999 where quite regularly on Tuesdays you had an hour long Emmerdale at 8pm and The Bill at 9pm.
Originally Posted by Ray Tings:
“Tuesday 16 August 1983
ITV
16:20 - Hold Tight!: 2.70m
16:45 - Michael Grant of Musical Youth - This is Me: 3.04m
17:15 - Regional variations *
17:45 - News: 7.39m
18:00 - Regional variations *
19:00 - The Video Entertainers: 7.25m
19:30 - Bring 'Em Back Alive: 5.67m
20:30 - Don't Rock the Boat: 7.70m
21:00 - Storyboard: Woodentop: 7.09m
22:00 - News at Ten Under 6.81m
22:30 - The Bronx: 3.17m
*I don't have the figure for Crossroads but it was probably at least 10m
BBC1
16:45 - Battle of the Planets: 3.05m
17:05 - John Craven's Newsround Week's average: 2.99m
17:10 - Animal Magic in Japan (R): 4.14m
17:40 - News Under 6.81m
18:00 - Regional news
18:25 - Tom and Jerry: 5.10m
18:30 - Dr Who (R) Week's average: 4.32m
18:55 - The Wonderful World of Disney: 5.87m
19:45 - The Freddie Starr Showcase: 5.75m
20:30 - Only Fools and Horses (R): 7.53m
21:00 - Nine O'Clock News: 6.9m
21:25 - Old Scores: 3.75m
22:15 - Film: The Don is Dead (Premiere): 4.30m”
“Tuesday 16 August 1983
ITV
16:20 - Hold Tight!: 2.70m
16:45 - Michael Grant of Musical Youth - This is Me: 3.04m
17:15 - Regional variations *
17:45 - News: 7.39m
18:00 - Regional variations *
19:00 - The Video Entertainers: 7.25m
19:30 - Bring 'Em Back Alive: 5.67m
20:30 - Don't Rock the Boat: 7.70m
21:00 - Storyboard: Woodentop: 7.09m
22:00 - News at Ten Under 6.81m
22:30 - The Bronx: 3.17m
*I don't have the figure for Crossroads but it was probably at least 10m
BBC1
16:45 - Battle of the Planets: 3.05m
17:05 - John Craven's Newsround Week's average: 2.99m
17:10 - Animal Magic in Japan (R): 4.14m
17:40 - News Under 6.81m
18:00 - Regional news
18:25 - Tom and Jerry: 5.10m
18:30 - Dr Who (R) Week's average: 4.32m
18:55 - The Wonderful World of Disney: 5.87m
19:45 - The Freddie Starr Showcase: 5.75m
20:30 - Only Fools and Horses (R): 7.53m
21:00 - Nine O'Clock News: 6.9m
21:25 - Old Scores: 3.75m
22:15 - Film: The Don is Dead (Premiere): 4.30m”
Great stuff here, of course that was the Only Fools repeat run that was considered to have been the making of the programme, as you can see it was neck and neck with the new sitcom on ITV. The kids show ratings are interesting, at that point BBC1 had far, far more repeats in the summer - more or less Newsround and Play School were the only new shows - while ITV had new content all year round, and the same was true in primetime as well, as you can see.
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“Ross still wants to be Letterman with the set and the anarchic questions. He was almost rude to Malkovich last night insinuating that he was not good looking.
ITV on a Saturday night is more suited to the conversational style with no desk. Aspel was perfect at it. Wogan and Parky could do it.
A woman host would be a good idea. Malkovich seemed more comfortable with the Irish comedienne. She was better than Ross.
Build a set like a winter cabin with a fire and comfy chairs. Some wine and nibbles and see what flows. If all of the guests are from the same movie or TV show then sobeit. Preferably not quite though.
I know that sounds a bit Buble. Actually, some Des O Connor type of host could work.”
“Ross still wants to be Letterman with the set and the anarchic questions. He was almost rude to Malkovich last night insinuating that he was not good looking.
ITV on a Saturday night is more suited to the conversational style with no desk. Aspel was perfect at it. Wogan and Parky could do it.
A woman host would be a good idea. Malkovich seemed more comfortable with the Irish comedienne. She was better than Ross.
Build a set like a winter cabin with a fire and comfy chairs. Some wine and nibbles and see what flows. If all of the guests are from the same movie or TV show then sobeit. Preferably not quite though.
I know that sounds a bit Buble. Actually, some Des O Connor type of host could work.”
Well, you could argue that you already have that show, and it's The Graham Norton Show, where all the guests are on together and interact and you get lots of interesting encounters. Indeed it's always a big disappointment on Norton when the guests are interviewed separately, or just with people from their own film, to the extent that I would argue if that's the only way they want to be interviewed, they shouldn't be invited on.
Anyway, I've said here before what I think the problem with Ross' show, both on ITV and the Beeb. He just can't be bothered with half of the guests. If there's a guest he's genuinely interested in it can be quite a good interview, if he's not he just absolutely goes through the motions, asks boring questions and spends more time asking them about the other guest than themselves. I don't know why they persist with this format. It would a million times better if they only had one guest he actually cared about.




”