Originally Posted by cylon6:
“People must like it more this year. It has more positive chatter about it this year.”
I think that's accurate. Just like the 'glory days' it's still staged and scripted, still features sob stories and joke acts, but crucially it's not taking itself seriously, is well produced and has a winning panel (the old-school originals plus Nicole).
Saturday's episode was average but last night's was excellent. Even in its heyday audition episodes would vary in quality, so nothing's really changed there. What has changed is all the ugliness from the post-2010 era has been removed and a heavy dose of nostalgia has been added in, with 2016 production values.
As I said the day after the premiere, there's isn't a lot more they can do to improve the programme now (at auditions at least) - we'll see how Bootcamp, 6 Chairs, Judges Houses and Lives are produced; if they have the same magic touch, it should do okay this year - at least not sustain losses, and possibly be marginally up. Also depends how the scheduling works this year - I think XF should have shorter live shows (1h45 max) and avoid SCD clashes where at all possible.
If, then, they can keep the same panel next year (which I imagine will involve throwing a LOT of money at Sharon O) they could see another rise next year as viewers will see they're sticking with a winning formula. Anyway, got ahead of myself there, we'll see how next weekend does.