Originally Posted by
D.M.N.:
“More info on Bake Off's move: http://uk.businessinsider.com/how-gr...ve-show-2016-9
- Tony Hall (BBC's Director General) blocked the corporation from paying £25 million
- Channel 4's deal was not the largest on the table
- Allegedly, an offer of £50 million per year was rejected 
- Channel 4 had been preparing the bid for months, the contract was two sides of A4 paper”
Yep, Netflix or Amazon Prime was the one who bid £50m after being the first to bump up to £25m. I think the reason they went with Channel 4 is having made lots of stuff for them before, and Bake Off just wouldn't work on VOD.
Tony Hall did the right thing, I think. If it came out that the BBC were paying £25m a year for Bake Off, the right wing press would complain, and considering the Tories are hellbent on cutting the BBC as it is, they'd point to that as an example of the BBC not getting value for money. Plus, it wouldn't have looked very good if it came out about rival broadcasters and the BBC going in all guns blazing to keep the show when ITV have already complained about them chasing ratings.
As awful as it seems now, the BBC did the right thing. They've got Mel and Sue, and they'll potentially have Mary and/or Paul.