• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 68)
<<
<
252 of 877
>>
>
iaindb
22-09-2016
Originally Posted by Roscoe Barnes:
“Yep, it's certainly a lot of XF over the weekend. I think Saturday will do fine. Strictly finishing at 8.00pm will no doubt help it, but by extending it 20-mins that could drag the average down if viewers start to drift after 9.00pm - which we've seen happen in the past.

Next week is a massive problem with those Strictly clashes. I'd probably push the Saturday show back to 8.30pm and run it till 10.00pm but like this week now, it's pushing everything else later.

I like your idea of Saturday 8-10pm and Sunday 8-9pm though as well. It limits the clashes and like you say the Sunday show could be just finding out whose through. I don't like the format of finding out half one night and half the other. It doesn't work right for me. And yes, you're right about the Sunday judges houses show been huge when it was all announced on one night. That works better for the show IMO.”

BIB: That's not really a big issue looking at the ratings that Newzoids and JR have been getting.
Dan R
22-09-2016
The scheduling for XF in this case is a bit of a lose-lose situation, they can't do a Friday show due to viewers being out partying, they can't carry it on too late and they can't rush the show. In this sense, the two-hour shows last year were a blessing as they got to flesh it out without running too late, however, it was a bit of a drag getting through three weeks of SCC.

Max profits may have been achieved by shortening the shows, though I think audience decline tends to happen after 9.30 rather than 9 as others have suggested. They should avoid dragging anything over 10pm this year.

I'm glad Syco are putting quality first as usual, as this will help word-of-mouth, and reputation will in-turn bring more viewers in. It's a well though-out, common-sense way of organising the show.
sunbeam007
22-09-2016
It'll be interesting to see if the ratings for Newszoids and Ross are affected by the later start. My guess is that the number holds and the shares rise. If that happens, the message will be clear to ITV.

Starting the Sunday XF show before 8pm is lunacy. It seems odd that they are trying to protect Victoria rather than their franchise show.
H of De Vil
22-09-2016
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“It'll be interesting to see if the ratings for Newszoids and Ross are affected by the later start. My guess is that the number holds and the shares rise. If that happens, the message will be clear to ITV.

Starting the Sunday XF show before 8pm is lunacy. It seems odd that they are trying to protect Victoria rather than their franchise show.”

Don't mess about with the start of Victoria. If they push it back to 9.30pm, that means viewers who watch Poldark first then catch up with Victoria on +1, have then got to wait 30minutes to watch it. They are more likely to then record it, thus decreasing the overnights rating.

Victoria needs to stay at 9pm. Its doing well. Moving its start time will only bugger up viewers.

With Newziods and JR on later. Newziods will be at 2.5m again, but JR will drop below 2m because Ross just seems weak whever he's scheduled. The share will likely rise a couple of points though.

Tonight. I don't think Paranoid looks like it will do very well. Good cast, cliche storyline. I think it'll launch with 4.1m, dropping next week.

Unforgotten was so much better. I'm glad ITV renewed it.
marke09
22-09-2016
Patrick Foster ‏@patrickfoster2 44m44 minutes ago

Had been rumours C4 were planning to start Bake Off ad-free,to help migrate viewers. Not true;but it will run longer than 1hr to include ads

Patrick Foster ‏@patrickfoster2 52m52 minutes ago

Paul Hollywood's C4 deal was agreed Weds eve. He phoned BBC to tell them. Beeb rushed forward Mary announcement to catch C4 on the hop.
Fudd
22-09-2016
It's time for a new season of the DS Ratings Prediction Game!

With week one upon us it's time predict how returning drama The Fall will figure, whether The Level will be at a good level and how Morgana Robinson's The Agency will pull in the viewers. Will Strictly be up year-on-year for it's results and how will The X Factor do for the first Judge's House show of the series? Could Ambulance put the BBC One 9pm slot in need of life support or race away from the opposition? Is Damned damned from the off?

Why not have a go at predicting accordingly? Everyone's welcome, whetehr you're a new player, lapsed or a regular! Just click
HERE, left click 'Quote', delete the quote marks and get predicting!

Thank you to everyone who takes part in advance.


Dancc
22-09-2016
Originally Posted by Score:
“Incidentally, if you're into US ratings, I recommend this site: http://www.spottedratings.com

You might be familiar with it already but there's a lot of interesting analysis on there and there's also a really good bank of historical ratings.”

Thanks for the link. Strong alternative to TV By The Numbers, will look at both from now on.

Originally Posted by marke09:
“Patrick Foster ‏@patrickfoster2 44m44 minutes ago

Had been rumours C4 were planning to start Bake Off ad-free,to help migrate viewers. Not true;but it will run longer than 1hr to include ads”

Pah! That was never likely was it? It's costing them a bomb. Ad-free was a non starter of an idea, even for the first episode.

Interesting though that it will run beyond an hour, negating the need for overly significant format tweaks in order to trim it down.
sunbeam007
22-09-2016
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“Don't mess about with the start of Victoria. If they push it back to 9.30pm, that means viewers who watch Poldark first then catch up with Victoria on +1, have then got to wait 30minutes to watch it. They are more likely to then record it, thus decreasing the overnights rating.

Victoria needs to stay at 9pm. Its doing well. Moving its start time will only bugger up viewers.
.”

I don't think it should matter to ITV if Victoria falls (ahem) below Poldark. The show is already a success and nobody is going to worry about the drop when the reason will be obvious. Since Poldark is an ITV drama too, it's even less of a problem.

The ratings of XF are far more important to ITV from a PR and financial sense. The Sunday show will get over 1m fewer viewers than the Saturday one. Poor optics.
jake lyle
22-09-2016
Originally Posted by Aaron_2015:
“
I saw Nigella Lawson mentioned earlier, that would be a good pick. Although isn't she very BBC?”

She actually started on C4, did a number of shows with them and then went to ITV to do a flop daytime cookery/chat show. Only ended up on the BBC after that.
Also Nigelia judged that flop cookery show "The Taste" on C4 in 2014.
sunbeam007
22-09-2016
Originally Posted by marke09:
“
Paul Hollywood's C4 deal was agreed Weds eve. He phoned BBC to tell them. Beeb rushed forward Mary announcement to catch C4 on the hop.”

Disappointing that the BBC took advantage of Paul Hollywood's courtesy.

The whole thing has become a squabble between children.
wizzywick
22-09-2016
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“Disappointing that the BBC took advantage of Paul Hollywood's courtesy.

The whole thing has become a squabble between children.”

Of course the BBC are going to take advantage. Why wouldn't they? C4 would have done the same had Mary Berry gone over to C4.
sunbeam007
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Of course the BBC are going to take advantage. Why wouldn't they? C4 would have done the same had Mary Berry gone over to C4.”

There was no advantage gained. It was pretty pointless and doesn't encourage any future common courtesy.
H of De Vil
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“I don't think it should matter to ITV if Victoria falls (ahem) below Poldark. The show is already a success and nobody is going to worry about the drop when the reason will be obvious. Since Poldark is an ITV drama too, it's even less of a problem.

The ratings of XF are far more important to ITV from a PR and financial sense. The Sunday show will get over 1m fewer viewers than the Saturday one. Poor optics.”

You can't sacrifice Victoria's numbers to boost TXF. Just because Victoria is over 5m, doesn't mean they can let it drop 1m viewers just to make sure TXF starts at 8pm.

ITV need viewers to watch Victoria LIVE in order to sell ad space that makes them money. Just because Victiria falls below Poldark, of which ITV own both, doesn't automatically mean ITV will still recommission Victoria.

As it stands, with Victoria overnighting 5m-5.5m, and consolidating cose to 8m its dead cert for a recommission. But due to the cost, if it fell below 5m often, it would be on thin ice as to a second series.

Its best to keep it at 9pm.
sunbeam007
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“You can't sacrifice Victoria's numbers to boost TXF. Just because Victoria is over 5m, doesn't mean they can let it drop 1m viewers just to make sure TXF starts at 8pm.

ITV need viewers to watch Victoria LIVE in order to sell ad space that makes them money. Just because Victiria falls below Poldark, of which ITV own both, doesn't automatically mean ITV will still recommission Victoria.

As it stands, with Victoria overnighting 5m-5.5m, and consolidating cose to 8m its dead cert for a recommission. But due to the cost, if it fell below 5m often, it would be on thin ice as to a second series.

Its best to keep it at 9pm.”

Two things: I don't think the rating would drop much after 7 days. The overnight might, though even that's questionable since it's possible all that would happen is XF would eat up Poldark overnights.

Secondly, ITV know what Vixtoria is now. If it was to drop they would know why and would have to decide if it was worth it or not. It'll be valuable metrics for the future; I don't think it'd affect Victoria's renewal at all.
erzrocks
23-09-2016
Some people on this thread haven't even thought of any other Motives for Paul to leave other then the money which just shows how carried away some people are getting. He wasn't getting a presenting job on top gear and who knows what if bbc were not offering any other shows that attracted him e.g daytime shows ( I do know that its a big if). With channel 4 he is definitely getting more money and they will definitely give him shows. So from a personal view the move is a great career choice and I wouldn't be surprised if he comes out with like an autobiography closer to when bake off starts on c4 describing how bbc didn't offer him anything to increase hype.
Aurora13
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“You can't sacrifice Victoria's numbers to boost TXF. Just because Victoria is over 5m, doesn't mean they can let it drop 1m viewers just to make sure TXF starts at 8pm.

ITV need viewers to watch Victoria LIVE in order to sell ad space that makes them money. Just because Victiria falls below Poldark, of which ITV own both, doesn't automatically mean ITV will still recommission Victoria.

As it stands, with Victoria overnighting 5m-5.5m, and consolidating cose to 8m its dead cert for a recommission. But due to the cost, if it fell below 5m often, it would be on thin ice as to a second series.

Its best to keep it at 9pm.”

Victoria must be very floggable internationally especially US. Agree it needs to stay at 9pm. Getting it established is critical.
sunbeam007
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by Aurora13:
“Victoria must be very floggable internationally especially US. Agree it needs to stay at 9pm. Getting it established is critical.”

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/...sterpiece-pbs/
Straker
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by erzrocks:
“Some people on this thread haven't even thought of any other Motives for Paul to leave other then the money which just shows how carried away some people are getting....”

Quote:
“With channel 4 he is definitely getting more money....”

You as well then.
cylon6
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“Disappointing that the BBC took advantage of Paul Hollywood's courtesy.

The whole thing has become a squabble between children.”

Courtesy would perhaps be to not go to Channel 4?

Channel 4 wanted to get all the press about Bake Off moving while it was still on BBC1. No problem in the BBC getting their press release out. Either way the result would have been the same. People saying good on Mary for staying and people saying Paul went for the money. Which is more or less what is coming through when you read Patrick Foster's story.
cylon6
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“There was no advantage gained. It was pretty pointless and doesn't encourage any future common courtesy.”

That's nonsense. There is no common courtesy when one channel buys another channel's show or one person leaves one channel for another.
Straker
23-09-2016
Hollywood on a million apparently and not the insane £7m that's been bandied around today:

Quote:
“Hollywood has signed a three-year deal, said to be worth around £1 million, to move with the hit baking show to its new home.”

And it seems Mary never seriously considered C4:

Quote:
“Berry is also understood to have refused to enter formal talks with Channel 4, with sources there confirming they had only “sporadic” contact with the presenter’s agent in the weeks since it was announced that Bake Off was leaving the BBC.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...ake-off-on-th/
cylon6
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by A.D.P:
“The brand is now " toxic" I can't see advertisers running to put Ads in it, even though st the BBC it had high youth viewers.

GBBO is like using Ryan Lochte to advertise your products for honesty.


More pressure on 4

Former Culture Secretary John Whittingdale says the £75million purchase of the show has led to fresh questions about whether such deals are “appropriate"
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/183474...ion-questions/”

Bake Off will stay on Channel 4, it'll get decent numbers but I doubt it'll be 10m, maybe 5/6m. Advertisers will still want to advertise in it. But I'm not sure it'll be as big as Channel 4 expect.

Right now Bake Off does feel tainted and Channel 4 is fighting a lot of PR fires as is Love Productions. BBC are coming out of this far better in terms of PR.

Those are my observations.
cylon6
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by Straker:
“Hollywood on a million apparently and not the insane £7m that's been bandied around today:

And it seems Mary never seriously considered C4:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...ake-off-on-th/”

As soon as Bake Off went to Channel 4 Mel, Sue and Mary weren't interested. They would have been offered considerably more money and they weren't interested. And that's why the narrative to the story is positive for Mel, Sue and Mary because they turned down a move and the story for Paul is that he went for the money.
JCR
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by DanManF1:
“Thank you. I was unaware of that.”

In the UK it has an "A Netflix Original Series" title card before the start.
Markynotts
23-09-2016
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“As soon as Bake Off went to Channel 4 Mel, Sue and Mary weren't interested. They would have been offered considerably more money and they weren't interested. And that's why the narrative to the story is positive for Mel, Sue and Mary because they turned down a move and the story for Paul is that he went for the money.”

Looking at the front pages of the newspapers this morning, they are all painting Paul badly. I think C4 are going to have to work very hard to turn this disaster around.
<<
<
252 of 877
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map