• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 68)
<<
<
302 of 877
>>
>
sunbeam007
03-10-2016
So I've checked to see who went through since I can't watch it for a fortnight. http://www.tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv...finalists.html

Gifty was the big one for me. She was the must. No Chris Peyton is a joke. HoneyG will draw more ratings but I hope they have Chris in as a wildcard. Of course not having the Philippines lady (can't recall name) simply because she could not fly to USA was nonsensical.

This is why you put 16 through and slash them fast. Let the viewers decide. But the producers will always fix things when they can as we've also seen in Strictly.
lewiep93
03-10-2016
Top Ten Most Watched Shows w/e 25 September:
The Great British Bake Off - 13.12m
Strictly Come Dancing (Sat) - 10.13m
The X Factor (Sat) - 8.73m (8.40m exc. +1)
Coronation Street (Mon 1930) - 7.82m (7.71m exc. +1)
Victoria - 7.65m (6.88m exc. +1)
Cold Feet - 6.91m (6.50m exc. +1)
EastEnders (Mon) - 6.86m
Emmerdale (Wed) - 6.58m (6.39m exc. +1)
Poldark - 6.54m
Antiques Roadshow - 5.97m

Some other notable officials:
Strictly Come Dancing (Fri) - 9.30m
The X Factor - 8.52m (7.94m exc. +1)
Our Girl - 5.54m
Paranoid - 5.52m (5.16m exc. +1)
Casualty - 5.39m
Countryfile - 5.00m
DCI Banks - 4.94m (4.37m exc. +1)
Paul O’Grady: For the Love of Dogs - 4.67m (4.48m exc. +1)
National Treasure - 4.28m (4.00m exc. +1)
Gogglebox - 3.53m (2.77m exc. +1)

Crikey, the Friday edition of Strictly had a 2.09m timeshift.
Score
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by pjh8:
“I think it's more to do with the exclusion of about 6 acts who lost out to these two. I also think Saara Alto the "finish fairy" is a bit of a novelty act too and the inclusion of Relley C who we've barely seen is equally baffling. That rating is bad and it'll continue to dwindle unless the producers can think of some sort of exciting twist quickly. Perhaps bring back 4 wildcards with a guest mentor each week? Maybe have a 2 part show next week with 16 acts to avoid a marathon show?”

You can't say anyone in the boys or girls category lost out to the two novelty acts though as they aren't in the same category.

Saara is quirky but she's a very good singer. Far better than most in her category. Relley C is an odd choice given her lack of airtime but she was good yesterday. In fact she probably gave the best performance in her category yesterday.

I can't see them doing wildcards as they've only got 2 hours. Maybe 1 act at a push. This is the advantage of having 16 rather than 12 though as they'd get away with 2 novelty acts in a larger field and there wouldn't have been as many controversial exits.
sunbeam007
03-10-2016
Some posters are going OTT in their reactions to XF. Most people just watch it, like Strictly. 9m consolidated for XF is solid for what many consider to be the weak episodes.

The idea that ITV and Syco don't care about the show and happily are driving viewers away is bizarre. It is clearly averaging 7.5m overnights for the splits not against SCD or running adverts.

Strictly also loses 1m+ viewers to XF when they clash (if only you could record shows) so I don't think the BBC will be forcing clashes in the future.

Poldark and Victoria are probably just losing overnight viewers to catch-up viewing.

EastEnders staying about 5m mark and should turn around soon going by posts on here.

Ryder Cup did okay despite the Brits not being able to able to win like the continental players. Insert Brexit joke.


Edit -- Thanks for the consolidated list.... Cold Feet is the 6th highest rated show in the autumn. If you're axing that ....
cylon6
03-10-2016
I didn't see that timeshift coming for the Friday Strictly! It's actually up on Friday's rating last year of 9.22m!
davies88
03-10-2016
Wow at POG Dogs. Still pulling in the numbers. Spectacular for that sort of show in that sort of slot on ITV.
Markynotts
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“I didn't see that timeshift coming for the Friday Strictly! It's actually up on Friday's rating last year of 9.22m! ”

I agree. A 2 million timeshift is pretty good for it. I thought that it would struggle to do that much. That Friday show catches people out but the timeshift shows that people want to catch up with it.

All those pensioners out at a Friday bingo I guess
Ray Tings
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“So I've checked to see who went through since I can't watch it for a fortnight.”

Is it scorchio?
Aurora13
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by Baz_James:
“Dropping a million from Saturday to Sunday, you mean? Hardly news. The results show always does worse not least because everybody and his dog already knows the result by the time Match of the Day starts!”

I watch on catch up. Only the bits I want to see. As you say result is out night before. Assume folks like me count only as a part viewer. Probably watch about 50%.
lewiep93
03-10-2016
Shock horror as DS posts a ratings report!

http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/strictl...aintwitterpost

Which is taken directly from Overnights.tv on Twitter... The days of ratings reports are long gone
pjh8
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by Score:
“You can't say anyone in the boys or girls category lost out to the two novelty acts though as they aren't in the same category.

Saara is quirky but she's a very good singer. Far better than most in her category. Relley C is an odd choice given her lack of airtime but she was good yesterday. In fact she probably gave the best performance in her category yesterday.

I can't see them doing wildcards as they've only got 2 hours. Maybe 1 act at a push. This is the advantage of having 16 rather than 12 though as they'd get away with 2 novelty acts in a larger field and there wouldn't have been as many controversial exits.”

Well I disagree with this. The two men were much superior to these two in my opinion and it seemed like the opinion of Sharon and Robbie until decision time also which was strange. In fact a lot of the judge's comments did not match up with their decisions at all.
xeo
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by lewiep93:
“Shock horror as DS posts a ratings report!

http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/strictl...aintwitterpost

Which is taken directly from Overnights.tv on Twitter... The days of ratings reports are long gone ”

The main website has become a poor man's BuzzFeed. A shame really, it used to be great.
Ray Tings
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by lewiep93:
“Shock horror as DS posts a ratings report!

http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/strictl...aintwitterpost

Which is taken directly from Overnights.tv on Twitter... The days of ratings reports are long gone ”

"Strictly Come Dancing absolutely smashed The X Factor in the ratings."

"Simon Cowell's gonna be mad."

"Prancing trumps caterwauling."

I'm off!
SG87
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by pjh8:
“Well I disagree with this. The two men were much superior to these two in my opinion and it seemed like the opinion of Sharon and Robbie until decision time also which was strange. In fact a lot of the judge's comments did not match up with their decisions at all.”

Sharon also put through two acts that she didn't even give a seat to in the six chair challenge and she's quite well known for not changing her opinions easily or quickly. It was all a bit baffling and isn't helping the reputation the programme has for fixing.

Although the same thing happens every year, it just feels a bit different this time in that it might actually be the final straw for viewers. It'll be interesting to see how the lives pan out now they've got rid of most of the people they focused on in the earlier rounds.
Markynotts
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by Ray Tings:
“"Strictly Come Dancing absolutely smashed The X Factor in the ratings".

"Simon Cowell's gonna be mad. "

"Prancing trumps caterwauling".

I'm off!”

I love the " people prefer watching celebs wearing glitter to popstar wannabes demonstrating their X Factor (or lack thereof)" statement

An article created in the style of a Daily Mail article, inform, incite and ignore
Score
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by pjh8:
“Well I disagree with this. The two men were much superior to these two in my opinion and it seemed like the opinion of Sharon and Robbie until decision time also which was strange. In fact a lot of the judge's comments did not match up with their decisions at all.”

Sharon and Robbie were both really positive about Relley C - from those comments it was clear she was going through. Less so about Saara I admit, not sure what was going on there. I'd probably have put James through over her, there should have been one of the men there.

Elsewhere, certainly Louis' comments matched up with his decisions. Simon's kind of did but his category was close anyway. Nicole's pretty much did as well from what I remember.
cylon6
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by Dan R:
“Funny how this is the rating everyone was predicting, but people are still calling it naff. Hardly a mention of SCD dropping a million.

8.8 million is almost 9, good consolidated.”

Originally Posted by Baz_James:
“Dropping a million from Saturday to Sunday, you mean? Hardly news. The results show always does worse not least because everybody and his dog already knows the result by the time Match of the Day starts!”

Strictly is down on Sunday due to the results show clashing completely with X Factor. Usually Saturday and Sunday get similar ratings.
cylon6
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by Markynotts:
“I agree. A 2 million timeshift is pretty good for it. I thought that it would struggle to do that much. That Friday show catches people out but the timeshift shows that people want to catch up with it.

All those pensioners out at a Friday bingo I guess ”

Well the old people have more money.

Strictly has never timeshifted 2m before. Very surprised by that Friday rating.
Dancc
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by Ray Tings:
“"Simon Cowell's gonna be mad." ”

PMSL at how badly written that DS article is.

Great reminder as to why I no longer read the DS news pages.
mlt11
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by Ray Tings:
“Sky Sports 4 - 04:00 PM Ryder Cup - Live 591k 3.6%”

Per Sport Business: Ryder Cup peaked at 1.4m (across SS1 + SS4).

https://twitter.com/SB_Intelligence
Dancc
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by mlt11:
“Per Sport Business: Ryder Cup peaked at 1.4m (across SS1 + SS4).

https://twitter.com/SB_Intelligence”

...and what would your take on that be?

Would I be right in thinking that's a shade disappointing?
mlt11
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“...and what would your take on that be?

Would I be right in thinking that's a shade disappointing?”

I think it's about what would be expected - it probably would have gone marginally higher if it had been an absolute nail biter going down to the last match or two.

Very rare for any non-football sport on Sky to go above a million but then the Ryder Cup is at the very top of Sky's non-football content so it absolutely should be delivering that sort of number.

Don't know if anyone can look up the peak for the 2012 Ryder Cup when it was last in USA (so same timeslot) - that was of course a remarkable Europe comeback win from behind that was much closer than last night.
Dancc
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by mlt11:
“I think it's about what would be expected - it probably would have gone marginally higher if it had been an absolute nail biter going down to the last match or two.

Very rare for any non-football sport on Sky to go above a million but then the Ryder Cup is at the very top of Sky's non-football content so it absolutely should be delivering that sort of number.

Don't know if anyone can look up the peak for the 2012 Ryder Cup when it was last in USA (so same timeslot) - that was of course a remarkable Europe comeback win from behind that was much closer than last night.”

Peak of 2.2m and an average of 1.3m in 2012 according to The Guardian:

https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...er-cup-viewers

But as you point out, totally different circumstances that day making comparisons difficult.
mogzyboy
03-10-2016
Originally Posted by mlt11:
“I think it's about what would be expected - it probably would have gone marginally higher if it had been an absolute nail biter going down to the last match or two.

Very rare for any non-football sport on Sky to go above a million but then the Ryder Cup is at the very top of Sky's non-football content so it absolutely should be delivering that sort of number.

Don't know if anyone can look up the peak for the 2012 Ryder Cup when it was last in USA (so same timeslot) - that was of course a remarkable Europe comeback win from behind that was much closer than last night.”

Peak of 2.23m for 2012 according to Part 41 of this thread.

Oh, Dancc beat me too it.
thengp12
03-10-2016
Can someone point me to a link of the Friday 23rd September and Sunday 1st October Strictly come Dancing audiance share % please? Thank You.
<<
<
302 of 877
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map