• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 68)
<<
<
325 of 881
>>
>
cylon6
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“XF would just be clashing for longer; I fail to see how this helps it. Even if had the same 6.2m rating, what was gained as now you're doomed at 9pm? Whatismore, ITV is seen as the aggressor.

The XF clearly is staying as an 8pm show and ITV has decided that it'll pay off as SCD whittles its minutes away. ITV has the full details of the numbers and it suggests that XF is actually doing quite well overall. It's beating SCD with 18-34 year olds and consolidates well. We don't know those full numbers so we don't know.

If Meet the Parents tops 3m it's a hit and needs renewing. Or if it consolidates to over 4m it's doing well. Its bar is very low as it's been given toxic land to build a home.

Now if XF really wants to take on SCD, it needs to start before Strictly. If XF started at 6:30 and SCD started at 8pm then that would be an interesting battle. Not that I want to see it happen.”

Stop being logical! STOP IT!

If X Factor was at the levels of 2008-2010 it could start early and take on Strictly. The way it is now it needs protection so you keep overlaps with Strictly to a minimum. ITV want live viewers for it not people recording and skimming through ads. Advertisers would prefer this as well. X Factor is still an attractive proposition for launching campaigns.
Fudd
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Stop being logical! STOP IT!

If X Factor was at the levels of 2008-2010 it could start early and take on Strictly. The way it is now it needs protection so you keep overlaps with Strictly to a minimum. ITV want live viewers for it not people recording and skimming through ads. Advertisers would prefer this as well. X Factor is still an attractive proposition for launching campaigns.”

The bigger concern for ITV is that a show scraping 6m is the only show to launch campaigns in during the run up to Christmas. They seem to really lack depth this year with Cold Feet not doing as well as Doc Martin, the soaps being down year-on-year, none of the new dramas taking off and, whilst doing well, Victoria rating well below Downton.
cylon6
09-10-2016
A few more Saturday ratings from Steve Williams.

Lottery 3.41m, Casualty 3.93m, Iron Man 1.30m, Dad's Army 1.03m, Boy George 1.27m.
SG87
09-10-2016
The scheduling can only do so much. SCD averaged comfortably above 9m and peaked at 10.6m. X Factor is posting a respectable figure above 6m by including +1, and peaked at 7.2m. This is just weeks after X Factor was comfortably above 7m and even nudged above 8m on one occasion. It was a poor performance no matter how it gets dressed up, and I say that as someone who enjoyed last nights programme.
sunbeam007
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Stop being logical! STOP IT!

If X Factor was at the levels of 2008-2010 it could start early and take on Strictly. The way it is now it needs protection so you keep overlaps with Strictly to a minimum. ITV want live viewers for it not people recording and skimming through ads. Advertisers would prefer this as well. X Factor is still an attractive proposition for launching campaigns.”

Have the Xmas campaigns started? The big stores like JLewis and the supermarkets. They normally launch on XF in early October which shows the power of the show.

ITV simply needs to build its new shows so that they have a cluster of shows in the future. Meet the Parents should really have been given a chance to breathe first. BBC1 really now only has SCD so that's the spot to avoid.

Ultimately you need a well-liked show going on from 6-7pm. Right now they don't have that so I'd throw the Chase or Tipping Point there. The BBC can't allow the Voice, Dance and Little Big Shots to become 5m+ shows.

Last night I saw a bit of the Voice on TF1 (French TV that is one of the channels we can get here in the hotel). There was a girl around 8 belting out Beyonce's Listen which was really impressive. I was shocked someone so young was on the show.

Then I realised it was The Voice Kids. And then I realised ITV may have a sleeper if they schedule it right and get the talent. It'll need to be differentiated from Little Big Shots though.
cylon6
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“The bigger concern for ITV is that a show scraping 6m is the only show to launch campaigns in during the run up to Christmas. They seem to really lack depth this year with Cold Feet not doing as well as Doc Martin, the soaps being down year-on-year, none of the new dramas taking off and, whilst doing well, Victoria rating well below Downton.”

Few dramas are Downton Abbey level in terms of ratings. Victoria is doing well. I'm A Celebrity is the only other programme in Autumn that gets big youth demo numbers like X Factor. BBC1 doesn't have much in Autumn to entice those viewers apart from The Apprentice?

ITV have been better so far this Autumn than BBC1. expected Cold Feet to be higher and it's only in the last few weeks that clunkers have arrived in Paranoid and The Level under performing along with DCI Banks.
Markynotts
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by SG87:
“The scheduling can only do so much. SCD averaged comfortably above 9m and peaked at 10.6m. X Factor is posting a respectable figure above 6m by including +1, and peaked at 7.2m. This is just weeks after X Factor was comfortably above 7m and even nudged above 8m on one occasion. It was a poor performance no matter how it gets dressed up, and I say that as someone who enjoyed last nights programme.”

I believe that the rating for last nights TXF was the lowest overnight this series
Dan R
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Markynotts:
“I believe that the rating for last nights TXF was the lowest overnight this series”

The one where it had a 50-minute clash with a 10m show? Colour me shocked!
Making mountains out of molehills springs to mind.
-Jodie-
09-10-2016
Posted in the wrong thread. Very sorry.
Belligerence
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by pjh8:
“There is no competition on XF this year unlike Strictly. One act (Matt) is leaps and bounds ahead of the rest and is the most obvious winner ever! It could've been a close competitive show had the right acts been selected.”

But unlike Strictly, a proportion of the X Factor votes aren't decided by the judges. It's entirely down to the viewer.

Matt ticks the fanbase box so he's the clear favourite. But if Honey G builds up momentum, who's to say she won't win. Whereas before the thought of a Wagner or Jedward reaching the final was enough to pee off Simon, it's something the judges would now welcome as it keeps the show relevant.
RickLopez
09-10-2016
You've Been Framed 1.60m -HD
X Factor 4.43m -HD
Newzoids 1.51m -HD
8 out of 10 Cats does Countdown 970k
Football on 5 300k
Xtra Factor 370k

exc +1

couple more from Steve Williams
LHolmes
09-10-2016
Baffles me why they keep Xtra Factor going. People just aren't watching it in the kind of numbers they used to. It used to get over a million didn't it?
Markynotts
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Dan R:
“The one where it had a 50-minute clash with a 10m show? Colour me shocked!
Making mountains out of molehills springs to mind.”

The point still stands

Just accept it
Oliver_Tomlinso
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Markynotts:
“The point still stands

Just accept it”

just stop posting facts
Markynotts
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Oliver_Tomlinso:
“just stop posting facts”

Now that would be the easier thing to do
Dan R
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Markynotts:
“The point still stands

Just accept it”

I won't accept people with stupid agendas trying to belittle a show over every small thing, no.
mogzyboy
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Dan R:
“The one where it had a 50-minute clash with a 10m show? Colour me shocked!
Making mountains out of molehills springs to mind.”

You remind me a lot of Comical Ali who, during the Iraq War in 2003, claimed that Baghdad wasn't under attack and all was fine. Yet, in the background, you could see US tanks moving in.

He was, like you, in complete denial of the facts.
Markynotts
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Dan R:
“I won't accept people with stupid agendas trying to belittle a show over every small thing, no.”

The agendas that you imagine are in peoples minds

I think you need help at times

Go and have a cup of tea
Aaron_2015
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Dan R:
“The one where it had a 50-minute clash with a 10m show? Colour me shocked!
Making mountains out of molehills springs to mind.”

The point still stands. Unless you want to discount the figure like you want to discount last year completely?

Ludicrous.
Dan R
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by mogzyboy:
“You remind me a lot of Comical Ali who, during the Iraq War in 2003, claimed that Baghdad wasn't under attack and all was fine. Yet, in the background, you could see US tanks moving in.

He was, like you, in complete denial of the facts.”

Denying facts would be denying that it was a series low - which I didn't.
I just pointed out extenuating circumstances which need to be considered when analysing.
mogzyboy
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Aaron_2015:
“The point still stands. Unless you want to discount the figure like you want to discount last year completely?

Ludicrous.”

No, no, no! It's up 600k year-on-year, as he pointed out earlier. So obviously we're allowed to compare it with last year again.
H of De Vil
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Dan R:
“Believe it or not, not everyone shares your weird hatred for the contestants this year. Most performances were excellent, the judges were on form and the production was superb. That is what the viewers will see.

I agree about the lead in however.”

Weird hatred?? You mean like your weird love of Simon Cowell?

There is a difference between not liking who they have picked to be on the live shows, and hating them. Murderers I would hate. Contestants on TXF...hate? What waste of energy that would be.

I simply find it irriating that they have put through two acts who cannot sing, and one (or two) who are simply there for fame. They have put through two poor singers in favour of some actual talent. All the other singers are fine.

I an agree with everything else. The Live show last night was much better than last year.
mogzyboy
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by Dan R:
“Denying facts would be denying that it was a series low - which I didn't.
I just pointed out extenuating circumstances which need to be considered when analysing. ”

And if you actually bothered reading people's posts, you will note that those circumstances are being considered.
PaulJoseph22
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by mogzyboy:
“And if you actually bothered reading people's posts, you will note that those circumstances are being considered.”

Sorry if this has been asked already. When are consolidated ratings issued?
H of De Vil
09-10-2016
Originally Posted by PaulJoseph22:
“Sorry if this has been asked already. When are consolidated ratings issued?”

Monday usually after 1.30pm. Sometimes we get snippets today if we are lucky
<<
<
325 of 881
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map