Originally Posted by Andy23:
“Yes there isn't wall to wall coverage, but they go from one extreme to another and offer no coverage at all, there is a paragraph on a Monday and a preview if it is deemed worth it, but I find it quite odd that the highest rating programmes on TV that cover many hours can't justify one double page spread.”
Why should they? I see this week that Emmerdale gets a preview on Thursday and Corrie gets a preview on Friday when there's something worth saying about them. Why write about them for the sake of it? Otherwise you may as well write about the news every week.
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“I did know it was coming, but you've gone down in my estimation that it came from you. I thought you were above turning an informative post into just an excuse for channel wars.”
It wasn't slagging off ITV. It was slagging off a particular ITV programme.
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“I wasn't aware viewers were only allowed one hour of politics a week? And not even on the same day?
Why do people watch Sunday Politics when it's the same as Marr on an hour previous but not as good?
BBC QT is increasingly a parody of itself these days in any case and should have some competition. There was also a Labour Party QT Special in prime time the other week which I remember you supporting and sticking up for, plus of course it rated well in any case despite the ongoing Labour Party leadership row boring a lot of people.”
I don't see the confusion here. The main point was that something a bit like Question Time might appeal to the Question Time audience, but they are already watching Question Time, and also, that is a big audience in the context of its slot, but a small audience compared to primetime ITV. It's also a far, far more established show where even if people don't watch it regularly, they at least know what it is. Most of the ITV audience have never watched The Agenda and don't know what it is, so aren't going to switch on in the first place.
And I say again, you watch telly in a different frame of mind at different times of the day. I find The Premier League Show a bit disappointing because at 10pm I was expecting something a bit different and more involved than Football Focus II. 8pm of just the most bizarre slot for this kind of programme - especially on ITV. You may as well put Sunday Politics at 8pm, see how well that does.
Also, I am fed up with taking issue with one particular programme being read as some kind of issue with a whole channel and the result of some kind of agenda.
Originally Posted by Baz_James:
“Do you think they won't stick the knife in for making programmes that aren't for public consumption or find a way to reveal exactly what's happening in these closed sessions anyway? One closed pilot, maybe two for technical issues, fair enough. But 10 just looks ridiculous and suggests that they have no faith in the concept themselves. And as has been said, who the heck is going to make time in their schedule to do an interview that nobody ever gets to see?”
Eh? They make loads of pilots nobody ever sees. I was reading The Guardian the other day and they were reporting on ITV doing a full-scale rehearsal of their racing coverage at Cheltenham the other day. They interviewed people, everything. And it's easy to get guests for a pilot, they can pull in plenty of favours. It also means they can film something to show TV critics - I remember when 8 Out Of 10 Cats started, the Radio Times and other publications talking it up based on an untransmitted pilot with David Walliams which was brilliant.
I don't know who would think it was ridiculous, they do it all the time. When Breakfast Time began they'd done three weeks of daily pilots to make sure everything was working. The Big Breakfast was another one. They do these things all the time.