Originally Posted by Baz_James:
“So we're discounting the World Cup coinciding with new TV technologies whacking up sales of telly boxes (it's amazing how much greater your desire for watching the box is when you've just shelled out a month's income on a new one!) and one of the worst winters for low temperatures and snow for many a long year?”
True enough, and December 2010 really was a remarkable month, I could barely leave the house for about three weeks. It really was the equivalent of the summer of 76 and I look forward to boring people about it with my memories of it for decades to come. I don't think if I live to be a hundred I'll see so much snow over such a long period. It felt like it was never going to end.
Originally Posted by Aaron_2015:
“Meet The Parents is actually quite decent, and would undoubtedly doing better if it was placed elsewhere. The format is entertaining enough, the host is perfectly capable and overall it's a good bit of light entertainment.
If MTP was a bit more established, it would be decent opposition to Strictly.”
Well, yes, and as I mentioned last week, my mum was sufficiently interested in the format and the host to plan to record it, but because it was in the middle of Strictly she forgot all about it, and there's no repeats. However, I see there is a repeat of This Time Next Year, even though all that's facing is Watchdog and it has a much cushier slot. That makes no sense to me whatsoever.
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“The celebs were really Z list and obscure last night as they often are. A comedians special and the most famous was probably Rhona Cameron.
I bet a normal person edition would rate just as well on a Saturday teatime.”
Well, I look forward to the nation rushing to its screens tonight to watch Matt Allwright vs Keith Allen on The Chase. I can't remember Pointless ever being Kylie vs Madonna, that one must have passed me by. It's almost as if people watch Pointless because of what the contestants say and do, rather than who they are. I am very excited to see people like Roger McGough on this series. And of course, if they did have more household names, you definitely wouldn't complain about them having "the same old celebrities", would you?
Originally Posted by Dan R:
“There's a wider thing about spin-off shows. I don't really bother with The Apprentice: You're Fired this year either, but I will for the final. BGMT is skyscrapers ahead of any reality spin-off IMO, after a series of that it's hard to get interested into any of the lesser-produced ones like Xtra.”
I have never seen the point of spin-off shows straight after the programme, really, I have never had the inclination to watch something going behind the scenes of a programme immediately after it finishes. Especially when it's just stuff that's not interesting enough to go in the actual programme.
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“BTW - by May 2003 Blind Date failed to get 3.5m viewers though it did top 6m earlier in its run. People also forget that Cilla replaced Duncan Norvelle as host.”
Well, she didn't really, Duncan Norvelle did a pilot but it was a total disaster and it didn't go any further. He was long gone before it ever got anywhere near getting on television.
Originally Posted by RickLopez:
“Also so much better for the Lottery, Who Dares Wins is much more popular than 5 star.”
And it's also a better programme, of course, illustrating that people turn on for the format, not just because it's a lottery quiz. When it's a good lottery quiz the ratings go up, when it's a bad one they go down.