• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 68)
<<
<
633 of 881
>>
>
wizzywick
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by northlad:
“I am not disputing any of that,but there is a tariff the BBC publishes for the various genres,which say for soap is 100k per hour,includes a built in margin of profit for the indie,possibly 20/25%. They do not make them with no profit. I agree they will not get anything from overseas sales etc,but the making of a programme could still be profitable.”

Oh I see what you mean now! It still wouldn't be worth ITV's while to produce the BBC's biggest shows if they have no overall control or ability to make money from the format. If EastEnders for instance became the property of ITV for broadcast on the BBC, they'd snap it up. But for ITV to produce EastEnders for the BBC and to be owned by the BBC would be of no advantage to them at all, particularly as the BBC could change production companies periodically, and ITV could even be disregarded in favour of BBC Studios once again in a couple of years.

I can see plenty of scope for the smaller Indies but I seriously doubt Love Productions would get much work!
Fudd
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by LHolmes:
“I think the biggest ever gap between EastEnders and Emmerdale head to head must be this from Thursday 18th February 2010:

19:30 - EastEnders: 10.77m (41.5%)
* peak: 11.4m (42.1%) @ 20:00

20:00 - Emmerdale: 4.27m (15.7%)
* 20:00 to 20:25 - 4.2m (15.2%)”

25th anniversary week for EastEnders though the live episode itself was on Friday. Was the 8pm episode for Emmerdale regular by then?
Jonwo
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Oh I see what you mean now! It still wouldn't be worth ITV's while to produce the BBC's biggest shows if they have no overall control or ability to make money from the format. If EastEnders for instance became the property of ITV for broadcast on the BBC, they'd snap it up. But for ITV to produce EastEnders for the BBC and to be owned by the BBC would be of no advantage to them at all, particularly as the BBC could change production companies periodically, and ITV could even be disregarded in favour of BBC Studios once again in a couple of years.

I can see plenty of scope for the smaller Indies but I seriously doubt Love Productions would get much work!”

The smaller indies would have to compete with superindies who have a stronger track record, not that its impossible but I think the BBC would pick Shiver or Princess to do Watchdog or Thames or Endemol to produce A Question of Sport than a small indie.
wizzywick
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by Jonwo:
“The smaller indies would have to compete with superindies who have a stronger track record, not that its impossible but I think the BBC would pick Shiver or Princess to do Watchdog or Thames or Endemol to produce A Question of Sport than a small indie.”

Yes. I see that. For shows like EastEnders, it would be better for a bigger indie to produce it as they would be responsible for staff costs and so on. But an indie can only win the bid IF it is proven to be better value than the BBC doing it themselves. So, if they have to pay Thames or Endemol to produce it but end up paying more in order to give said indie a small profit, then chances are, on cost, BBC Studios would retain the rights to produce it.

The BBC doesn't have to choose an indie over BBC Studios, only that they have to give indies the chance to bid.
dennisboy
01-12-2016
All this doom talk of EastEnders is getting tiresome. Yes Emmerdale is winning in the overnights most of the time but that says basically nothing about how EastEnders is doing and everything about how Emmerdale is doing.

Fair enough if EE was down heavily yoy and that's why ED had got ahead but currently EE is pretty flat or even up yoy but ED is up yoy which is putting it ahead. If ED was flat on 2015, EE would still be ahead.

I hope that made sense
wizzywick
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by dennisboy:
“All this doom talk of EastEnders is getting tiresome. Yes Emmerdale is winning in the overnights most of the time but that says basically nothing about how EastEnders is doing and everything about how Emmerdale is doing.

Fair enough if EE was down heavily yoy and that's why ED had got ahead but currently EE is pretty flat or even up yoy but ED is up yoy which is putting it ahead. If ED was flat on 2015, EE would still be ahead.

I hope that made sense ”

Lol! Don't worry it's late. I think I got the gist of it!
james_lndsay
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Oh I see what you mean now! It still wouldn't be worth ITV's while to produce the BBC's biggest shows if they have no overall control or ability to make money from the format. If EastEnders for instance became the property of ITV for broadcast on the BBC, they'd snap it up. But for ITV to produce EastEnders for the BBC and to be owned by the BBC would be of no advantage to them at all, particularly as the BBC could change production companies periodically, and ITV could even be disregarded in favour of BBC Studios once again in a couple of years.

I can see plenty of scope for the smaller Indies but I seriously doubt Love Productions would get much work!”

A bit of unsubstantiated gossip regarding them, because of what they did they are believed to have been embargoed from any future BBC commissions and again unconfirmed but the BBC are apparently going to now insist any indie who pitches a show has to agree to a three year exclusivity clause that will prevent a successful production being taken from them.

Personally I do not like Indies making shows for any channel, it should be up to the broadcaster if they want to keep everything in house and I would axe the indie quota or have it set at 5% of a broadcasters output, If I commission a cabinet maker to make me some furniture he does not own the end product so why should Indies own shows paid for out of the tv license.
Rob1985
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“
Looks as though Emmerdale has lost a lot of the casual viewers it used to attract to its hour-long episodes, over the last ten years.”

Please tell me you're joking?
sunbeam007
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by james_lndsay:
“A bit of unsubstantiated gossip regarding them, because of what they did they are believed to have been embargoed from any future BBC commissions and again unconfirmed but the BBC are apparently going to now insist any indie who pitches a show has to agree to a three year exclusivity clause that will prevent a successful production being taken from them.

Personally I do not like Indies making shows for any channel, it should be up to the broadcaster if they want to keep everything in house and I would axe the indie quota or have it set at 5% of a broadcasters output, If I commission a cabinet maker to make me some furniture he does not own the end product so why should Indies own shows paid for out of the tv license.”

I imagine it's because it's paid for out of the tv licence.
wizzywick
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by james_lndsay:
“A bit of unsubstantiated gossip regarding them, because of what they did they are believed to have been embargoed from any future BBC commissions and again unconfirmed but the BBC are apparently going to now insist any indie who pitches a show has to agree to a three year exclusivity clause that will prevent a successful production being taken from them.

Personally I do not like Indies making shows for any channel, it should be up to the broadcaster if they want to keep everything in house and I would axe the indie quota or have it set at 5% of a broadcasters output, If I commission a cabinet maker to make me some furniture he does not own the end product so why should Indies own shows paid for out of the tv license.”

Some indies pitch their own ideas, such as Bake Off, which means the format remains with the indie. Others make shows for broadcasters after broadcasters have sent out their ideas and therefore the idea remains with the broadcaster. You can own a format without owning the production rights, and vice versa.
derek500
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by Jonwo:
“The smaller indies would have to compete with superindies who have a stronger track record, not that its impossible but I think the BBC would pick Shiver or Princess to do Watchdog or Thames or Endemol to produce A Question of Sport than a small indie.”

Shiver and Princess are owned by ITV Studios and Endemol Shine respectively, so they are not really smaller indies. They're what makes the parent companies super indies.
ftv
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by derek500:
“Shiver and Princess are owned by ITV Studios and Endemol Shine respectively, so they are not really smaller indies. They're what makes the parent companies super indies.”

I think we can guarantee Love Productions won't be getting any of the work
lewiep93
01-12-2016
Robin Parker ‏@robinparker55 4m4 minutes ago
The Missing bows out with 5.7m - highest since s2 ep1. Previous episodes have added around 2m on catch-up
H of De Vil
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by lewiep93:
“Robin Parker ‏@robinparker55 4m4 minutes ago
The Missing bows out with 5.7m - highest since s2 ep1. Previous episodes have added around 2m on catch-up”

That's an excellent figure against IAC. I imagine IAC was dented, even though I suspect they don't share much audience crossover?

Shows what a good drama can do against IAC.
gavin shipman
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by lewiep93:
“Robin Parker ‏@robinparker55 4m4 minutes ago
The Missing bows out with 5.7m - highest since s2 ep1. Previous episodes have added around 2m on catch-up”

Fantastic. I think it will consolidate to 8m.
ftv
01-12-2016
The two brothers who wrote The Missing were on BBC Breakfast this morning and it looks like there will be a series 3.
cylon6
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by lewiep93:
“Robin Parker ‏@robinparker55 4m4 minutes ago
The Missing bows out with 5.7m - highest since s2 ep1. Previous episodes have added around 2m on catch-up”

Great to see The Missing do well. It was a brilliant finale.
derek500
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“That's an excellent figure against IAC. I imagine IAC was dented, even though I suspect they don't share much audience crossover?

Shows what a good drama can do against IAC.”

I expect the crossover is pretty big. Looking forward to watching it. Next on our list when we've finished The Crown.
derek500
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Great to see The Missing do well. It was a brilliant finale.”

Hope it was better than the first series' ending.
H of De Vil
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by derek500:
“I expect the crossover is pretty big. Looking forward to watching it. Next on our list when we've finished The Crown.”

Well we'll see when the rating comes in. I expect you could be right.
cylon6
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by derek500:
“Hope it was better than the first series' ending.”

I liked the first series and I can see why people were disappointed but this one was MUCH better. A satisfying conclusion that has had near universal praise unlike the previous finale.
sunbeam007
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“That's an excellent figure against IAC. I imagine IAC was dented, even though I suspect they don't share much audience crossover?

Shows what a good drama can do against IAC.”

7.5m+ watch it every week and I suspect many watched it ASAP to avoid spoilers.
iaindb
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“Well we'll see when the rating comes in. I expect you could be right.”

Yes, why are you assuming people only watch one type of programme. I don't and I'll wager you don't either.

I don't watch IAC and I'm probably a bit snooty about it but my take is that it is watched by a fair number of what we might refer to as "intelligent viewers" who regard it as a "guilty pleasure" and who also watch documentaries, current affairs and plentry of drama, including The Missing.
AnthonyC
01-12-2016
Originally Posted by lewiep93:
“Robin Parker ‏@robinparker55 4m4 minutes ago
The Missing bows out with 5.7m - highest since s2 ep1. Previous episodes have added around 2m on catch-up”

Great for The Missing S2 finale. And much better than some thought on here.

Episode 1 consolidated at 9.2m, I think we'll see the series average at 8.0-8.5m which is way better than other drama series of late.
Ray Tings
01-12-2016
#howquizzinggotcool on BBC4 at 9pm attracted 463.4k/1.9%
23.6% share for The Missing.

http://www.overnights.tv
<<
<
633 of 881
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map