• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 68)
<<
<
700 of 881
>>
>
Hassaan13
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by Aaron_2015:
“Frozen doesn't really have the broad appeal that the previous Disney films have had, which is why I think The Lion King will do slightly better than everybody is expecting. Although saying that, any household with anybody under 10 will be watching Frozen.”

Yeah, that's my thinking too. Although, I don't think all households with people under the age of 10 would be watching Frozen, it might make up the majority but not all I don't think. Brave managed a rating of 5.5m last year, and that wasn't as huge as Frozen was. Frozen was huge at the time, and continued to be for another year or two - more so than most of the Christmas Day premieres.

It's a difficult one to call. One thing I will say is I think they'll be relatively close in the ratings.
Dancc
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by Hassaan13:
“It is a Sunday which should hopefully help Christmas Day viewing on the whole...”

I can see why you might think that, but traditionally Sunday if anything seems to hinder viewing figures on the big day.

In 2005 for example, the top 3 (consolidated) looked like this:

EastEnders - 10.6m
Doctor Who - 9.8m
Two Ronnies - 7.9m

Compared to 2004 when it fell on a Saturday:

EastEnders - 12.8m
Vicar of Dibley - 12.5m
Harry Potter - 8.4m

And 2006 when it fell on a Monday:

Vicar of Dibley - 12.4m
EastEnders (9pm) - 11.6m
EastEnders (6:30pm) - 9.4m

Then more recently when the 25th fell on a Sunday in 2011, EastEnders (-1.3m) and Doctor Who (-1.3m) were down markedly on the year before. So I wouldn't be at all surprised if this year confirms that the dreaded numbers of last year were no fluke and continues the downward trend.

Also, had anyone else forgotten Harry Potter had started life on BBC One? Because I certainly had. Good luck Frozen beating that figure!
thengp12
13-12-2016
Hassaan comes back and the thread rattles through the pages! I tell you this thread was a wasteland between the end of Britain's Got Talent and the start of GBBO
dennisboy
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“So Corrie and Emmerdale up year on year, EastEnders down. Interesting considering that there is the perceived notion that Corrie is down a fair bit.”

It's hardly down bucket loads - only 340k yoy and a few episodes last week were up.
sunbeam007
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“Last Years Soap ratings

Coronation Street :
6.97m/32.9% watched at 7.30pm (+1 125k/0.6%)
6.67m/30.0% returned at 8.30pm (+1 125k/0.6%)

EastEnders 6.17m (28.3%)
Emmerdale 6.06m (30.9%) at 7pm on ITV and 110k (0.5%)”

Is there any change to EE's ratings in February 2016 when BBC3 TV closed? Did those 300k viewers switch to BBC 1?
sunbeam007
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by Aaron_2015:
“Frozen doesn't really have the broad appeal that the previous Disney films have had, which is why I think The Lion King will do slightly better than everybody is expecting. Although saying that, any household with anybody under 10 will be watching Frozen.”

My kids won't see any TV after about midday and I'm sure many other families will be similar. If we weren't out and about, I would stick Frozen on for them though I'd be tempted to try out the TV premiere of Jungle Book on Xmas Day.
Hassaan13
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“I can see why you might think that, but traditionally Sunday if anything seems to hinder viewing figures on the big day.

In 2005 for example, the top 3 (consolidated) looked like this:

EastEnders - 10.6m
Doctor Who - 9.8m
Two Ronnies - 7.9m

Compared to 2004 when it fell on a Saturday:

EastEnders - 12.8m
Vicar of Dibley - 12.5m
Harry Potter - 8.4m

And 2006 when it fell on a Monday:

Vicar of Dibley - 12.4m
EastEnders (9pm) - 11.6m
EastEnders (6:30pm) - 9.4m

Then more recently when the 25th fell on a Sunday in 2011, EastEnders (-1.3m) and Doctor Who (-1.3m) were down markedly on the year before. So I wouldn't be at all surprised if this year confirms that the dreaded numbers of last year were no fluke and continues the downward trend.

Also, had anyone else forgotten Harry Potter had started life on BBC One? Because I certainly had. Good luck Frozen beating that figure!”

All good points. I notice the total audience being up in 2011, vs the previous year. All Star Family Fortunes did manage 6m up against Strictly that year which it might not have done any other year.

It would be nice to be able to see some improvement but it might be a big ask with this year's line up. I suppose if Frozen & Bake Off do really well in the early evening and boost the rest of the line up then that's something.

I think we might have another year where the biggest rating of the Christmas period isn't on Christmas Day (fireworks aside).
Rob1985
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“Is there any change to EE's ratings in February 2016 when BBC3 TV closed? Did those 300k viewers switch to BBC 1?”

No they didn't.
Steve Williams
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by DanManF1:
“Wikipedia (yes, I know) says it went out on Wednesday 28th November. Although, it also says that the host for that year is 'TBC', so that may not be too reliable...”

It was indeed on a Wednesday that year, though the high rating is not too much of a surprise because in that era the test card would have got ten million viewers on Wednesday at eight on ITV, straight after Corrie and opposite BBC1's weakest night of the week by miles.

Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Cost-cutting measure I'm guessing, since double-headed presentation is the only strength of the ITV Evening News (IMHO).”

Yes, and a bit of a shame, this, because this must be the first time that ITV haven't had a double headed news programme since, presumably, the launch of the original News at Ten in 1967. And I like double headed news presentation, you get a bit of variety during the programme and it seems a friendlier format, which is why it seems perfect for that slot. I know these days we all have to look at the cost of everything and the value of nothing but it doesn't necessarily mean that double headed presentation is double the cost, you can make savings elsewhere. So quite big and sad news, I think.

Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“Or try the Top of the Pops Awards again. ”

Indeed, they were very similar to the BBC Music Awards for the two years they ran in 2001 and 2002. It was basically an attempt to create a British version of the MTV Europe Awards, but they were all a bit unconvincing. They didn't have much credibility, most obviously when they gave Jennifer Lopez a made-up award in the first one clearly just for turning up. They were quite boring as well.

Originally Posted by Aaron_2015:
“Frozen doesn't really have the broad appeal that the previous Disney films have had, which is why I think The Lion King will do slightly better than everybody is expecting. Although saying that, any household with anybody under 10 will be watching Frozen.”

I think Frozen and The Lion King are going to be miles apart. There's an argument everyone's seen Frozen but everyone's definitely seen The Lion King in the cinema, on VHS, on the stage and of course on its previous TV appearance when nobody seemed that bothered about it. And also, it's on BBC1 on Christmas Day, the one day of the year when you can justifiably suggest BBC1 had a bit of a default audience (earned, of course, over many years).

Originally Posted by Dancc:
“I can see why you might think that, but traditionally Sunday if anything seems to hinder viewing figures on the big day.

In 2005 for example, the top 3 (consolidated) looked like this:

EastEnders - 10.6m
Doctor Who - 9.8m
Two Ronnies - 7.9m

Then more recently when the 25th fell on a Sunday in 2011, EastEnders (-1.3m) and Doctor Who (-1.3m) were down markedly on the year before. So I wouldn't be at all surprised if this year confirms that the dreaded numbers of last year were no fluke and continues the downward trend.

Also, had anyone else forgotten Harry Potter had started life on BBC One? Because I certainly had. Good luck Frozen beating that figure!”

Indeed, the last time BBC1 had a film in the evening of Christmas Day. I never liked it when they did that, though, it seemed a waste because primetime Christmas Day should be the showcase for new, British programming. They showed the first Potter film again on Christmas Eve 2005, then that was it for Potter on the Beeb.

I wouldn't suggest Christmas on a Sunday has anything to do with the ratings, it's Christmas Day. They don't go down because everyone's in church or up because nobody's in the shops. You can't extrapolate much from previous years, it depends on the schedules. Christmas Day 2005 was especially weak, Doctor Who aside the big attractions were The Green Green Grass, My Family and The Two Ronnies, it was a pretty poor line-up. Indeed, that was probably the last year before BBC1 reinvented itself around Strictly, Who and a big comedy special which is the pattern that it's more or less kept to for every Christmas Day since.

As for 2011, again it depends on the quality of the shows themselves. Who was a bit less of a draw because the year before it had been Matt Smith's first Christmas show. Also Christmas 2010 was of course absolutely bloody freezing and there was snow everywhere.

Christmas has only been on a Sunday four times in 22 years, so it's hard to pick up patterns from that. Besides, it was on a Sunday in 1977 and that was the greatest Christmas Day in the history of British broadcasting. It doesn't matter what day Christmas Day is, nobody remembers what day it is. Christmas Day is Christmas Day.
RickLopez
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by thengp12:
“Hassaan comes back and the thread rattles through the pages! I tell you this thread was a wasteland between the end of Britain's Got Talent and the start of GBBO”

Shouldn't we be on a new thread by now? 700 pages.
thengp12
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by RickLopez:
“Shouldn't we be on a new thread by now? 700 pages.”

Yeah normally it turns over at about 450-600 pages.
sunbeam007
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by Rob1985:
“No they didn't.”

Makes you wonder where these people went. I assumed they'd hit the EE consolidated number at least, if not the overnight.
wizzywick
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by Hassaan13:
“I'm b-b-back! Thanks to the mods for giving me another chance.

As for last night's ratings, poor for the BBC Music Awards, but solid for the Prince Philip doc on ITV.”

A big big welcome back. You were missed. Now, if the mods could give SamuelW another chance,it will feel like our original family is back!

I really don't see the point of the BBC Music Awards. If they must do it, then I'd prefer it i they shoved it on at 9.30pm on the first September Saturday night when there's no MotD.
Andy23
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by Steve Williams:
“
I wouldn't suggest Christmas on a Sunday has anything to do with the ratings, it's Christmas Day. They don't go down because everyone's in church or up because nobody's in the shops. You can't extrapolate much from previous years, it depends on the schedules. Christmas Day 2005 was especially weak, Doctor Who aside the big attractions were The Green Green Grass, My Family and The Two Ronnies, it was a pretty poor line-up. Indeed, that was probably the last year before BBC1 reinvented itself around Strictly, Who and a big comedy special which is the pattern that it's more or less kept to for every Christmas Day since.”

Although the 'big comedy special' element has been relegated a tad in recent years, now being just Mrs Brown at 10:30pm rather than a big special, often a remake, at 9pm.

I agree that what day Christmas Day falls on makes no difference at all, Christmas Day is like a big Sunday every year!

And it falls nicely because New Year's Day is definitely like a Sunday, but big in the more negative way, the ultimate Sunday night back to work feeling (although we do have the BH on Monday)

I also agree it's a shame the ITV Evening News won't be double headed anymore, hopefully it will return when they get a new editor, but then they'd have to justify the cost which is harder than justifying a saving. The double headed bulletin has moved from bulletin to bulletin on ITV it was at lunchtimes until they brought back News at Ten the first time round. The BBC News at Six was double headed until quite recently, maybe ten years ago.
iaindb
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by RickLopez:
“It's David Walliams overkill at the moment.

I hope Charlotte Moore doesn't do a High Fearnley-Whittngstall on him and give him lots of shows that don't rate. Walliams and Friend should steer her well away.

All the same music acts are appearing on the shows recently, Sting was on Strictly on Sunday and is at the Variety tonight,”

He's on Michael McIntyre's Big Show on Saturday as well.
jlp95bwfc
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“A big big welcome back. You were missed. Now, if the mods could give SamuelW another chance,it will feel like our original family is back!”

Good to see the forum thriving again. As for Samuel, the 'Itv Ratings Crisis' thread over in Broadcasting still gives me nightmares .
Andy23
13-12-2016
Imagine if ADP and SamuelW had both been around during the last few months of TXF discussions....
thengp12
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by jlp95bwfc:
“Good to see the forum thriving again. As for Samuel, the 'Itv Ratings Crisis' thread over in Broadcasting still gives me nightmares .”

Give me a flavour?!

Originally Posted by Andy23:
“Imagine if ADP and SamuelW had both been around during the last few months of TXF discussions....”

Was he Pro ITV then?
Pizzatheaction
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by sunbeam007:
“Have you got the data source for ITV?”

It was just a little piece in Radio Times magazine a year or so ago. It had the average age of a BBC One viewer somewhere in their fifties, and the average age of a (main channel) ITV viewer just one year below that.

No doubt BBC Two would push the BBC age up, and ITV2 would push the ITV group age down, but there was little between the two main channels.

Probably only sixteen weeks of "telebox programme X Factors" making the difference.
lewiep93
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by thengp12:
“Give me a flavour?!



Was he Pro ITV then?”

God no. If you can, search for the ITV Weekly Reach Crisis thread he created. Interesting stuff...

I know people "miss" him but there is only so much ITV bashing people can take before things get really heated. I was looking in the thread archives from December 2013 and it gave me a headache reading all the arguments.
H of De Vil
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by Hassaan13:
“Yeah, that's my thinking too. Although, I don't think all households with people under the age of 10 would be watching Frozen, it might make up the majority but not all I don't think. Brave managed a rating of 5.5m last year, and that wasn't as huge as Frozen was. Frozen was huge at the time, and continued to be for another year or two - more so than most of the Christmas Day premieres.

It's a difficult one to call. One thing I will say is I think they'll be relatively close in the ratings.”

I think BBC1 will win the film clash by a mile. Frozen is a big film, its on BBC1 Christmas Day and its ad free. From this forum, I've noticed many have stated they never watch commercial channels on Christmas Day.

But The Lion King should be more of a pull for older viewers than if ITV were showing another modern animation. We might find, it will split the audience. BBC1 has the family audience, while ITV has the older viewers. Perhaps this should be a future ITV stategy. While BBC1 show the modern animations, ITV should acquire the classic Disney films. I would love to see Snow White and the Seven Dwarves on Christmas Day.

But he last thing ITV should do is let it go past without promotion. They've good three great Disny animations they haven't shown before (Sleeping Beauty, 101 Damations and TLK), so it would be worth promoting these. Otherwise they won't stand a chance. I bet BBC1 are promoting their films.
sunbeam007
13-12-2016
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“It was just a little piece in Radio Times magazine a year or so ago. It had the average age of a BBC One viewer somewhere in their fifties, and the average age of a (main channel) ITV viewer just one year below that.

No doubt BBC Two would push the BBC age up, and ITV2 would push the ITV group age down, but there was little between the two main channels.

Probably only sixteen weeks of "telebox programme X Factors" making the difference. ”

Ah that's a shame, I'd like to have seen some detail. Nevermind, thanks.
BBC2 matches BBC1 with both averaging [probably now] 61. Emmerdale and Corrie both skew old, are on a lot and get big ratings so they'll bumping numbers.

That's assuming the RT was right in what it said. I agree with you that ITV2 and Be will have taken younger viewers away but then ITV3 must average pretty old. I'd love to see the numbers. Far more interesting data analysis than I used to get paid for.

There is of course nothing wrong with having shows that attract older audiences, ITV need a few more and maybe BBC1 need a few less.
H of De Vil
14-12-2016
I notice on ITV Press Centre, they have Ninja Warrior UK down from 7pm on Saturday 7th Janaury.

That will mean it will got head to head with Let It Shine. I think that means TVUK will be on Saturday, and Dance on Sunday.
Pizzatheaction
14-12-2016
Originally Posted by Steve Williams:
“Yes, and a bit of a shame, this, because this must be the first time that ITV haven't had a double headed news programme since, presumably, the launch of the original News at Ten in 1967. And I like double headed news presentation, you get a bit of variety during the programme and it seems a friendlier format, which is why it seems perfect for that slot. I know these days we all have to look at the cost of everything and the value of nothing but it doesn't necessarily mean that double headed presentation is double the cost, you can make savings elsewhere. So quite big and sad news, I think.”

And with it being their most popular and highest profile bulletin, the extra presenter is a good safety valve in the event of the other having a coughing fit or a sudden requirement to visit the bathroom!*

The BBC News at Six will at least have a News Channel presenter standing by, but ITV would be reliant on the Late News presenter being nearby and not having popped out for a snack.

(*or sitting on studio-invading lesbians.)
Roscoe Barnes
14-12-2016
Welcome back Hassaan. You've been missed.

Thanks for all the ratings carried across to this thread. Much appreciated.

<<
<
700 of 881
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map