DS Forums

 
 

The Tennis Thread (Part 31)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27-07-2016, 17:44
smude
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 9,779
Cherry, I wouldn't put it as the fifth major.

8 of the top 20 will be missing at the Olympic's, IW markets itself as the fifth major and you wouldn't get those kind of numbers there on a regular year and the WTF will usually yield all of the top eight or possibly seven of them if one is injured.

I think the past two Olympic's it has seemed that it was growing in tennis, there are a few who love it of the big names like Roger, Andy and Rafa, but this year seems to be showing that it's not all important to the players as it is in other sports.
I think the players enjoyed being in London which was quite user friendly. I think Rio is not such an exciting prospect. I think Zika is a factor and the unpredictability of the country. I am suprised Raonic isn't there but not so much Berdych who has a new wife with whom he will want children.
smude is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 27-07-2016, 17:47
anyonefortennis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,779
I think the players enjoyed being in London which was quite user friendly. I think Rio is not such an exciting prospect. I think Zika is a factor and the unpredictability of the country. I am suprised Raonic isn't there but not so much Berdych who has a new wife with whom he will want children.
The Olympic village isn't even ready. The Aussies refused to move in as all the toilets were blocked and there was sewage water running down the walls. When they turned all the lights on in the rooms, the electricity blew. The GB team are facing the same problems.
anyonefortennis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 17:50
Cherry-choc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 4,835
Further to my previous post, wasn't Nick too young to get on the original Pokemon bandwagon? It seemed to peak in 1999/2000, when he would be about 4-5. He lost to Shapovalov, who was born in 1999 so he was defo too young.

Cherry, I wouldn't put it as the fifth major.

8 of the top 20 will be missing at the Olympic's, IW markets itself as the fifth major and you wouldn't get those kind of numbers there on a regular year and the WTF will usually yield all of the top eight or possibly seven of them if one is injured.

I think the past two Olympic's it has seemed that it was growing in tennis, there are a few who love it of the big names like Roger, Andy and Rafa, but this year seems to be showing that it's not all important to the players as it is in other sports.
Well, the Olympics limits countries to entering 4 singles players, I think. So countries that have huge representation in the top 100 like Spain/France/USA will be disadvantaged. I think top players have also jumped on the Zika train and used that as an excuse, not wanting to go for...other reasons. *ahem*

There's also the relative rarity of the Olympics increasing its prestige - you typically only get 2-3 chances to ascend the podium and win singles gold in your career. You have a chance to win IW and WTF every year.

IW is marketed as the fifth major because Larry Ellison is loaded and can afford to fill his desert tourney with everything under the sun. In reality, many of the matches are poor quality. WTF is also all about the moolah, at least 5 of the top 8 players are knackered at the end of the season, just going through the motions before the off-season and it shows in the one-sided nature of many matches. I don't care how glitzy their walk-ons are
Cherry-choc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 18:04
Jenny1986
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,611
Flair only gets you so far, particularly in the women's game. Weapons matter much more...especially serve. Matches are slugfests from the baseline, and you can't bring a knife to a gunfight. Robotic as it is, Konta has a very effective game for modern conditions. It won't change until the conditions change, or poly strings are banned.
This is sadly true, look no further than Radwanska, she should have a cabinet full of trophies with her talent.

Also IW as a fifth slam is just daft. Delusions of grandeur if you ask me. They apparently have good wifi, must be a fifth slam right?
Jenny1986 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 18:27
amelia_lee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,055
Further to my previous post, wasn't Nick too young to get on the original Pokemon bandwagon? It seemed to peak in 1999/2000, when he would be about 4-5. He lost to Shapovalov, who was born in 1999 so he was defo too young.


Well, the Olympics limits countries to entering 4 singles players, I think. So countries that have huge representation in the top 100 like Spain/France/USA will be disadvantaged. I think top players have also jumped on the Zika train and used that as an excuse, not wanting to go for...other reasons. *ahem*

There's also the relative rarity of the Olympics increasing its prestige - you typically only get 2-3 chances to ascend the podium and win singles gold in your career. You have a chance to win IW and WTF every year.

IW is marketed as the fifth major because Larry Ellison is loaded and can afford to fill his desert tourney with everything under the sun. In reality, many of the matches are poor quality. WTF is also all about the moolah, at least 5 of the top 8 players are knackered at the end of the season, just going through the motions before the off-season and it shows in the one-sided nature of many matches. I don't care how glitzy their walk-ons are
I completely agree with you about IW, it's just Larry doing what he does, like when he wanted a bigger and better hit for Haiti, but in the end it was awkward and too staged, the original had a great atmosphere as it wasn't planned.

I just used it as something they say.

IW and the WTF does come every year, but you still get the full line up. You haven't got that this year at the Olympic's and I think it shows it doesn't matter as much in tennis. I don't think the athlete's should risk it and go there, but the other sports are because it is their life and their goals. In tennis it's a slam and then a master's they want as goals.

I just don't see it as a fifth slam at all and I don't hear the players saying it. It's something great to have, but it isn't right up there.
amelia_lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 18:33
amelia_lee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,055
The Olympic village isn't even ready. The Aussies refused to move in as all the toilets were blocked and there was sewage water running down the walls. When they turned all the lights on in the rooms, the electricity blew. The GB team are facing the same problems.
It's awful. I saw James Cracknell the other day say the guys he knew wouldn't go in there and he said the places he had stayed with them were pretty rough, so it must be bad.

This example you just gave is unacceptable.
amelia_lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 18:42
CLL Dodge
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Green Hills of Earth
Posts: 80,438
ITF latest:

Webley-Smith doing a little better in the rematch with the player who beat her in qualifying yesterday. Into a final set this time.

Laura and Katy still some hours away from starting their match.
CLL Dodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 18:52
Jenny1986
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,611
It's awful. I saw James Cracknell the other day say the guys he knew wouldn't go in there and he said the places he had stayed with them were pretty rough, so it must be bad.

This example you just gave is unacceptable.
Pictures of the Aus rooms It looks worse than dodgy student accommodation.

Also loads of rooms haven't passed safety tests yet.
Jenny1986 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:01
Cherry-choc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 4,835
This is sadly true, look no further than Radwanska, she should have a cabinet full of trophies with her talent.

Also IW as a fifth slam is just daft. Delusions of grandeur if you ask me. They apparently have good wifi, must be a fifth slam right?
Aga would be a slam winner in an earlier era, say late 80s. Gurl was born too late.

Nick will be happy with the wi-fi, he can catch Pokemon at every changeover...

I completely agree with you about IW, it's just Larry doing what he does, like when he wanted a bigger and better hit for Haiti, but in the end it was awkward and too staged, the original had a great atmosphere as it wasn't planned.

I just used it as something they say.

IW and the WTF does come every year, but you still get the full line up. You haven't got that this year at the Olympic's and I think it shows it doesn't matter as much in tennis. I don't think the athlete's should risk it and go there, but the other sports are because it is their life and their goals. In tennis it's a slam and then a master's they want as goals.

I just don't see it as a fifth slam at all and I don't hear the players saying it. It's something great to have, but it isn't right up there.
Well, I suppose I'm bitter in a way as Muzza never ever plays well at IW, it's his bogey masters and many of his worst losses have happened there. It's a wonder he's ever made the final.

That said, I disagree about the lineup (on the women's side). Williams sisters boycotted the event from 2001 onwards and only recently returned, so IW crowds defo weren't getting the full lineup.

The Olympic village isn't even ready. The Aussies refused to move in as all the toilets were blocked and there was sewage water running down the walls. When they turned all the lights on in the rooms, the electricity blew. The GB team are facing the same problems.
Aussies are so precious these days, it's unreal. I'd wager that they've seen worse in the outback
Cherry-choc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:16
Lisa.B
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East Mids
Posts: 42,957
I think a protected ranking means that if you are out injured then when you return to the circuit you can use a protected ranking to play in a tournament, if the time away means that a player would not get a direct entry

I think that is how it works, but if I have got it wrong then please do correct me
Yep and for Azarenka she'll get a protected ranking if she returns within 12 months of the birth.

The Olympic village isn't even ready. The Aussies refused to move in as all the toilets were blocked and there was sewage water running down the walls. When they turned all the lights on in the rooms, the electricity blew. The GB team are facing the same problems.
At least Team GB are in a completed section.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...age-unfinished

It's just one nightmare after another. The housing market has bombed, so nobody is buying the properties for after the Olympics, the guy bankrolling the Athlete's Village is probably now heavily in debt.

Even some of the stadia still isn't complete because of the financial issues.

Check out the lovely shadow that centre court will have because it seems they're leaving it unfinished.
Lisa.B is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:22
amelia_lee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,055
Aga would be a slam winner in an earlier era, say late 80s. Gurl was born too late.

Nick will be happy with the wi-fi, he can catch Pokemon at every changeover...


Well, I suppose I'm bitter in a way as Muzza never ever plays well at IW, it's his bogey masters and many of his worst losses have happened there. It's a wonder he's ever made the final.

That said, I disagree about the lineup (on the women's side). Williams sisters boycotted the event from 2001 onwards and only recently returned, so IW crowds defo weren't getting the full lineup.


Aussies are so precious these days, it's unreal. I'd wager that they've seen worse in the outback
Agree about Aggie, she would have multiple slams in another era, but then maybe her head may get in her sometimes. She's had chances at some slams, when she lost to Sabine in the semi's at Wimbledon, she played a bad match, credit to Sabine who played well, but Aggie wasn't there.

To be clear, I really don't think IW is the fifth slam. I just don't think the Olympic's are at all. I think Larry markets it as that and it gets said a lot, but to me it's not. I do think the WTF's are right up there though, they may be all about the money, but if you have to beat all of the top ten to win a title, it's pretty big.
Yes the Williams sisters did miss it, for clear reasons, but all of the other top players will go and they have now gone back too.

But again, I think it's slams and masters that are the peak of their careers, obviously it's an achievement to win a gold, but it's not a huge gap if you haven't because it's not what tennis is about.
amelia_lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:25
Cherry-choc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 4,835
Oh dear, Thiem retired. As did Querrey, Chardy. Isner looked knackered after going deep in Washington. Errani withdrew. Feel for the Rogers Cup organisers at this point.

Thiem has played an awful lot in the first half of the year, and foolishly played Kitzbuhel last week. Wonder if he'll take his place in Los Cabos.
Cherry-choc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:26
amelia_lee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,055
Gosh, that is bad.

I have to say, I never understand this, it's like it comes up suddenly, but they know for years that they have the games, so get it together!
amelia_lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:26
footygirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sportyland
Posts: 30,070
This is sadly true, look no further than Radwanska, she should have a cabinet full of trophies with her talent.

Also IW as a fifth slam is just daft. Delusions of grandeur if you ask me. They apparently have good wifi, must be a fifth slam right?
Radwanska has a lot of flair but without a big forehand or serve she is more likely to get blown off court by someone who has those attributes.

Tracy Austin's game for me wasn't the prettiest to watch, but she made the most of what she had. She did not have the longevity of say someone like Chrissie, and Chrissie had a lot of flair in her game. The return of serve, backhand and lob to name a few
footygirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:30
CLL Dodge
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Green Hills of Earth
Posts: 80,438
ITF latest:

Webley-Smith doing a little better in the rematch with the player who beat her in qualifying yesterday. Into a final set this time.

Laura and Katy still some hours away from starting their match.
And Emily's lost again.
CLL Dodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:30
footygirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sportyland
Posts: 30,070
Barbie Girl v Venus is next on Court Centrale

I do like Venus's tennis dress
footygirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:30
Lisa.B
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East Mids
Posts: 42,957
Belinda Bencic has withdrawn from Rio. Fair enough reasoning given her injury woes.

Does continue to put Hingis in a pickle though!
Lisa.B is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:43
Cherry-choc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 4,835
At least Team GB are in a completed section.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...age-unfinished

It's just one nightmare after another. The housing market has bombed, so nobody is buying the properties for after the Olympics, the guy bankrolling the Athlete's Village is probably now heavily in debt.

Even some of the stadia still isn't complete because of the financial issues.

Check out the lovely shadow that centre court will have because it seems they're leaving it unfinished.
Tbh, it would be a big ask for any country to host the World Cup and Olympics back to back. Only a handful would be able to manage and have plenty of existing infrastructure/stadia, Brazil ain't one of 'em.

Agree about Aggie, she would have multiple slams in another era, but then maybe her head may get in her sometimes. She's had chances at some slams, when she lost to Sabine in the semi's at Wimbledon, she played a bad match, credit to Sabine who played well, but Aggie wasn't there.

To be clear, I really don't think IW is the fifth slam. I just don't think the Olympic's are at all. I think Larry markets it as that and it gets said a lot, but to me it's not. I do think the WTF's are right up there though, they may be all about the money, but if you have to beat all of the top ten to win a title, it's pretty big.
Yes the Williams sisters did miss it, for clear reasons, but all of the other top players will go and they have now gone back too.

But again, I think it's slams and masters that are the peak of their careers, obviously it's an achievement to win a gold, but it's not a huge gap if you haven't because it's not what tennis is about.
Of course you rate the WTF when Rog has a cabinet full of 'em. I can't take an event where you can lose twice but still end up with the trophy seriously. Just a glorified exho and Kermode's chance to milk the European cash cow once more before the year ends. Not budging on this

Gosh, that is bad.

I have to say, I never understand this, it's like it comes up suddenly, but they know for years that they have the games, so get it together!
Well yes, but Brazil has corruption up the wazoo. Must take ages for anything to get done and plenty of stuff won't get done, if they can get away with it.

I think Third World countries should prioritise their own citizens and address the chronic problems they have before they bid for these stupidly expensive sporting events, with their inevitable white elephants. Very few Olympics have managed to turn a profit. In Brazil's case it's widespread crime, stark inequality, environment, endemic corruption...too many to list. No wonder Brazilians are so angry. Prob a discussion for a different thread, but eh.

Belinda Bencic has withdrawn from Rio. Fair enough reasoning given her injury woes.

Does continue to put Hingis in a pickle though!
Bloody hell, this wrist thing seems proper serious. BB's momentum has ground to a halt.

Will Martina pair up with Timi Bacs now?
Cherry-choc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:47
anyonefortennis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,779
Yep and for Azarenka she'll get a protected ranking if she returns within 12 months of the birth.



At least Team GB are in a completed section.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...age-unfinished

It's just one nightmare after another. The housing market has bombed, so nobody is buying the properties for after the Olympics, the guy bankrolling the Athlete's Village is probably now heavily in debt.

Even some of the stadia still isn't complete because of the financial issues.

Check out the lovely shadow that centre court will have because it seems they're leaving it unfinished.
Is that white roof on centre court supposed to be all the way around? They are leaving it only one third finished?
anyonefortennis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:50
footygirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sportyland
Posts: 30,070
Tbh, it would be a big ask for any country to host the World Cup and Olympics back to back. Only a handful would be able to manage and have plenty of existing infrastructure/stadia, Brazil ain't one of 'em.


Of course you rate the WTF when Rog has a cabinet full of 'em. I can't take an event where you can lose twice but still end up with the trophy seriously. Just a glorified exho and Kermode's chance to milk the European cash cow once more before the year ends. Not budging on this


Well yes, but Brazil has corruption up the wazoo. Must take ages for anything to get done and plenty of stuff won't get done, if they can get away with it.

I think Third World countries should prioritise their own citizens and address the chronic problems they have before they bid for these stupidly expensive sporting events, with their inevitable white elephants. Very few Olympics have managed to turn a profit. In Brazil's case it's widespread crime, stark inequality, environment, endemic corruption...too many to list. No wonder Brazilians are so angry. Prob a discussion for a different thread, but eh.


Bloody hell, this wrist thing seems proper serious. BB's momentum has ground to a halt.

Will Martina pair up with Timi Bacs now?
Is Baczinsky the only Swiss female on the team now
footygirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:54
dduk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,125
So Pliskova gets a W/O in Round 2 of the Rogers Cup, but Broady didn't get a W/O and had to play a LL and ended up losing? Does Pliskova get the W/O cause she's seeded? Otherwise, it doesn't sound fair to me
dduk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 19:55
Jenny1986
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,611
Gosh, that is bad.

I have to say, I never understand this, it's like it comes up suddenly, but they know for years that they have the games, so get it together!
The Olympic bids are a mystery to me, they got chosen in 2009. Why give the Olympics to Rio knowing they were hosting the World Cup in 2014? The world cup decision was made in 2007, so they knew. Where is the money coming from to host the 2 biggest events in the world? If the infrastructure isn't there, why choose them? It makes sense to somebody I guess, i'm sure the people living in favela's are thrilled about it.

It's not as bad a Qatar and the 2022 world cup, which is just madness.
Jenny1986 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 20:01
amelia_lee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,055
Haha, no Cherry, I'm not that way, I don't care if Roger has a lot of them, yeah he does, but so does Novak, who is also great too.

I've always thought they were valuable as a title before Roger, the big names have won it. You only play your very closest competitors, you cannot win by only playing people under the top ten.

I've also always thought the same about Olympic's for tennis before Roger. Roger has a gold anyway, in tennis, I just don't think it is that valuable a title, it's nice, but it's not one of the biggest ones for the sport, case in point Nicolás Massú won in 04 and Fish was the silver and of course the great Swiss of Marc Rosset has a gold.

A lot of the biggest names have won the finals, Fed and Novak, Andre, Sampras, Becker, Hewitt, Edberg, Lendl, Mcenroe, Conners, Borg. It's one of the big titles, even if it is heavily sponsored.
amelia_lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 20:04
anyonefortennis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,779
Belinda Bencic has withdrawn from Rio. Fair enough reasoning given her injury woes.

Does continue to put Hingis in a pickle though!
Belinda was supposed to team up with Stan. I guess he will team up with Hingis now that Roger has withdrawn.
anyonefortennis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2016, 20:10
Lisa.B
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East Mids
Posts: 42,957
Of course you rate the WTF when Rog has a cabinet full of 'em. I can't take an event where you can lose twice but still end up with the trophy seriously. Just a glorified exho and Kermode's chance to milk the European cash cow once more before the year ends. Not budging on this

I think Third World countries should prioritise their own citizens and address the chronic problems they have before they bid for these stupidly expensive sporting events, with their inevitable white elephants. Very few Olympics have managed to turn a profit. In Brazil's case it's widespread crime, stark inequality, environment, endemic corruption...too many to list. No wonder Brazilians are so angry. Prob a discussion for a different thread, but eh.


Bloody hell, this wrist thing seems proper serious. BB's momentum has ground to a halt.

Will Martina pair up with Timi Bacs now?
Pretty much my thoughts on the WTFs too.

I dread to think what financial mess will be left on this chart after Rio.

She needs to work on her fitness and conditioning. It was a similar story with the back injury earlier in the year, which wasn't helped by Belinda trying to play through the pain barrier. She's still getting used to her adult body I guess.

Yeah I'm guessing it'll be Hingis/Timea and Hingis/Stan now.

Is that white roof on centre court supposed to be all the way around? They are leaving it only one third finished?
It was supposed to.

So Pliskova gets a W/O in Round 2 of the Rogers Cup, but Broady didn't get a W/O and had to play a LL and ended up losing? Does Pliskova get the W/O cause she's seeded? Otherwise, it doesn't sound fair to me
Broady didn't get a walkover because seeded players get 1st Round byes, so lucky losers can still replace seeded players that withdraw in 2nd Round.
Lisa.B is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:58.