Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“They only had 8 seeds most years so not all top 10 players would necessarily get seeded.
At Wimbledon (post war and pre-Open tennis):
Men:
1959 (8 seeds): Bobby Wilson 4th
1963 (8 seeds): Mike Sangster 8th
Billy Knight was never seeded at Wimbledon.
Women (8 seeds throughout):
1946: Kay Menzies 4th, Jean Bostock 6th
1947: Kay Menzies 6th, Jean Bostock 8th
1948: Jean Bostock 5th
1949: Jean Quertier 6th, Austina Martlett 8th
1950: Betty Harrison 6th
1951: Jean Walker-Smith 8th
1952: Jean Walker-Smith 6th, Jean Rinkel Quertier 7th
1953: Angela Mortimer 5th, Helen Fletcher 6th
1954: Angela Mortimer 6th, Helen Fletcher 7th
1955: Angela Mortimer 4th, Angela Buxton 8th
1956: Angela Mortimer 3rd, Angela Buxton 6th, Shirley Bloomer 8th
1957: Shirley Bloomer 3rd, Angela Mortimer 7th
1958: Christine Truman 2nd. Shirley Bloomer 5th
1959: Christine Truman 1st, Angela Mortimer 2nd, Ann Haydon 8th
1960: Christine Truman 3rd, Ann Haydon 4th, Angela Mortimer 5th
1961: Ann Haydon 3rd, Christine Truman 6th, Angela Mortimer 7th
1962: Ann Haydon Jones 5th, Angela Mortimer 6th
1963: Ann Haydon-Jones 3rd
1964: Ann Haydon-Jones 6th
1966: Ann Haydon-Jones 3rd
1967: Ann Haydon-Jones 3rd, Virginia Wade 8th
These seedings would have been done by committee who would doubtless have been more aware of home players performances than those of foreign competitors so probably bumped our players up a bit.
Seedings for the other slams are on Wikipedia if you want to check them!”
Great research, Dodge and looks like I owe Bobby and Mike an apology; I wasn't aware of those high seedings.
At that time, also the top British players included TV commentator John Barrett, Geoff Paish, Roger Becker, Tony Pickars (Edberg!) and Mike Davies who died recently and who became a top administrator in the sport.
There's a great clip of Billy Knight (I think) playing Fred Stolle on centre court in 1964 on Youtube - looks like someone has taken a Super 8 cine camera into the stands and taken it from there. Sideways on, the film concentrates on the player at one end which is always an interesting way of watching a match. If you are a player at any level, you can learn quite a bit.
It's not great quality but better than nothing;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-iobN4UDQM
A little later, when I was a kid but watched Wimbledon all the time, you had Sir Stanley Matthews son, Stanley Matthews junior, Gerald Battrick, John Paish, Peter Curtis and Graham Stillwell, Paul Hutchins, John Clifton and then Mark Cox (a lovely bloke) who reached higher levels than the others.
I'm less surprised / not surprised at all about the women players as they were generally a higher presence at the top of the game and especially at Wimbledon.
You are spot on about the home committee. I think even now, it's not just the first 32 in the rankings who are the 32 seeds.
Also, quite simply, in both mens and womens tennis, there wasn't the depth of competitiveness as there is now. Back in the 60's and before, each country in the ITF got an invite to send 2 players and this might mean that some capable but not outstanding 'country club' players would end up playing in Grand Slams.
At one of the Fantasy Camps, Stolle made the comment that in the early / mid 60's, all the top players wouldn't face any sort of real challenge until maybe the 3rd or even the 4th round when they'd start coming up against someone from the then, relatively small pool of World class players
10+ years ago, a young man who I had been involved with indirectly, managed to get 1 ATP point by doing really well in a number of Satelite events and his ranking with that single point was =1,500!
Some people got quite a shock when I'd tell them that he wasn't top 100!
I'm not sure if the ranking numbers have been extended but wouldn't be surprised if today, that point wouldn't get him a ranking of higher than maybe 1,750 or even 2,000.