|
||||||||
Is Sharon Mitchell fat? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 421
|
Is Sharon Mitchell fat?
Not a troll thread.
I noticed that she has a cracking pair of legs and a great jaw line. She always wears black so it is hard to say if she has a big belly. I think shes hot! Better with age! |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 518
|
Fat sure and there is nothing wrong with a bit of fat. She however isn't obese.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
Fat sure and there is nothing wrong with a bit of fat. She however isn't obese.
How can you tell? Did she not have a boob reduction? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 337
|
The exaggerated shoulder pads don't do her any favours. I don't really get why this became her "thing" since her 2012 return, I don't remember her wearing them in the 00s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 13,486
|
Quote:
The exaggerated shoulder pads don't do her any favours. I don't really get why this became her "thing" since her 2012 return, I don't remember her wearing them in the 00s.
In regards to the OP, I've always thought she was very attractive in her younger years and even now, as you say she has fantastic legs and still looks very pretty which, if you take into account that she is nearing 50, is great. She is quite fat (not that this is a bad thing) and I remember reading something which said that when she first started, Letitia was not allowed to lose weight and as this was during her 10 year stint, I do wonder if this ultimately stayed with her for life. She does wear a lot of black and baggy tops and I don't think she's entirely comfortable with her weight: I remember seeing an interview with her (might have been the Graeme Norton anniversary special) in which she had her hands covering her front for the most part. She does also come across as very modest in reality too |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: here
Posts: 4,814
|
The trouble is, Sharon doesn't wear clothes that flatter her figure, she wears floaty things that emphasise plumpness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 493
|
She's top heavy and fabulous with a cracking set of pins. What more do you need in a woman!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
|
I find threads like this uneasy as they turn to body shaming so quickly if I was the actress I wouldn't really like reading comments calling her fat even if that isn't the intention and I don't think it's relevant at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,527
|
I found an article from 2009 that showed her quite slim after losing weight but she looked older in the face. Losing weight often does that. I think she looks better with a softer look. Her legs are great though, wish I had them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,351
|
She is beautiful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 26,604
|
She's top heavy which can make her look bigger than she actually is. My mate is a very similar build and takes a size 16 top but 12 bottom and people always think she's a big girl, despite her being quite slim on her bottom half with very slim legs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,009
|
Not in the slightest and I envy her legs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 421
|
I really fancy her!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
I was always under the impression that 2012 Sharon was meant to be the new Angie: battling addiction etc. Angie was a woman of her time and dressed very 80's which is why I suspect Sharon dresses this way
In regards to the OP, I've always thought she was very attractive in her younger years and even now, as you say she has fantastic legs and still looks very pretty which, if you take into account that she is nearing 50, is great. She is quite fat (not that this is a bad thing) and I remember reading something which said that when she first started, Letitia was not allowed to lose weight and as this was during her 10 year stint, I do wonder if this ultimately stayed with her for life. She does wear a lot of black and baggy tops and I don't think she's entirely comfortable with her weight: I remember seeing an interview with her (might have been the Graeme Norton anniversary special) in which she had her hands covering her front for the most part. She does also come across as very modest in reality too https://scopefeatures.files.wordpres.../ldean_1_1.jpg I'd like to think you're right re: Angie but I really don't think the writers at the time put any more thought into it beyond "Hey, Sharon was from the 80s, lets make shoulder pads be her thing because .... 80s" and now we're stuck with it. Combine that with the Gemma Collins-esq hair and it's really doing her a disservice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,096
|
She is plump, but I wouldn't call her obese. She is a bonny girl like Diana Dors. There's a difference between someone who has always been curvy/plump, and has always looked the same, and someone who is just plain obese and fills their face with pies.
I don't think people have to be THIN to be attractive, but being very obese is just not attractive at all! THIS is OK......... http://digitalspyuk.cdnds.net/14/24/...-rickman-3.jpg And this! https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...af82ea1a79.jpg And this! http://i4.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...manda-Lamb.jpg SHE is on the cusp... but still looks OK. http://mumbaigloss.in/wp-content/upl...rs-diwali4.jpg These are NOT OK (in my opinion!) http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/...x2-700x467.jpg http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...e-Sinclair.jpg http://cdn.quotesgram.com/small/1/25...n-very-fat.jpg http://images.lifeandstylemag.com/up...fit=crop&w=680 Letitia has always looked fine to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,200
|
Quote:
She is plump, but I wouldn't call her obese. She is a bonny girl like Diana Dors. There's a difference between someone who has always been curvy/plump, and has always looked the same, and someone who is just plain obese and fills their face with pies.
I don't think people have to be THIN to be attractive, but being very obese is just not attractive at all! THIS is OK......... http://digitalspyuk.cdnds.net/14/24/...-rickman-3.jpg And this! https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...af82ea1a79.jpg And this! http://i4.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...manda-Lamb.jpg SHE is on the cusp... but still looks OK. http://mumbaigloss.in/wp-content/upl...rs-diwali4.jpg These are NOT OK (in my opinion!) http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/...x2-700x467.jpg http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...e-Sinclair.jpg http://cdn.quotesgram.com/small/1/25...n-very-fat.jpg http://images.lifeandstylemag.com/up...fit=crop&w=680 Letitia has always looked fine to me. I agree with the OP she has cracking legs, but I really do not like fat shaming threads |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,423
|
She reminds me of Sam Fox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,528
|
No she's not fat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,288
|
She is about the same as she was in the 80s,90s but in 2000s she lost weight. But honestly who cares about her weight it's not like shes obese. I also agree her clothing is really bad at the moment. They should make her wardrobe similar to her 00s one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central London
Posts: 8,293
|
Quote:
She is plump, but I wouldn't call her obese. She is a bonny girl like Diana Dors. There's a difference between someone who has always been curvy/plump, and has always looked the same, and someone who is just plain obese and fills their face with pies.
. ![]() And no, she's not fat. She lost a lot of weight a few years back and it really didn't look good. As you become older a few pounds over is much better than a few pounds under. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Volleyball in Danny's Cungeon
Posts: 1,941
|
Fat or not i would still have a crack at Sharon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
Clipped your post for tidiness. Just wanted to say how much I agree with the BIB, Letitia has always reminded me of a 1950s film star, she looks great. Also I am very pleased to see she has changed her hair, nothing looks worse on a middle aged woman than long straight blonde hair, great from behind but a bit of a shock when the wearer turns around
![]() And no, she's not fat. She lost a lot of weight a few years back and it really didn't look good. As you become older a few pounds over is much better than a few pounds under.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 13,486
|
Quote:
Fat or not i would still have a crack at Sharon.
![]() I wonder why wardrobe insist on giving her such baggy clothing as judging by the previous photos posted, she actually has a fantastic figure and excellent legs |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
|
Somebody's weight is their own business. You don't have to be stick thin to be attractive and it's about time we got past that. For me it's about being comfortable with yourself and being healthy that matters.
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
|
Quote:
Somebody's weight is their own business. You don't have to be stick thin to be attractive and it's about time we got past that. For me it's about being comfortable with yourself and being healthy that matters.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:01.




