|
||||||||
BBC announces three new pros |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,013
|
Happy with all of them (although I'm joining the aged corner-sobbing crowd... I'll bring vodka
)It does feel like we'll be very heavy on Latin specialists this year, though. But I'm going mainly by very brief biographies at the moment so perhaps it's not really an issue. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 643
|
I hope that AJ and Chloe get celebs. It would show people that they can teach even though they are young. I think that Anton or Brendan will sit out leaving 16 couples so it's equally. I want AJ and Chloe to get celebs. I think they will get some young celebs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11,135
|
Really pleased about Neil he has always stood out in the pro dances hope he get's a decent partner.
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 188
|
If I am doing the maths right then Jared Murillo was only just 22 when he did his sting on Strictly. His introduction probably wasn't the most successful
, but it proves that young age is not exactly seen as an obstacle. I would be surprised if the young couple was already earmarked to be troupe-only, I rather think they do not have the line up 100% and want to keep their options open. Also, having more pros than celebs would make the pairing show a bit more interesting...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,656
|
I don't get this at all... I really hope we don't get 17 couples this year, 15 seemed a bit much in the early weeks and I feel like an even longer series would possibly be milking it a bit too far. But if they are just going to make up the numbers in pro routines, why bother with the big press announcement, as they've had extra dancers before without giving them this level of attention?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 508
|
On DWTS, in America, Emma Slater was 25 when paired with 77 year old Billy Dee Williams, so it has happened before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,727
|
Quote:
Also, having more pros than celebs would make the pairing show a bit more interesting...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11,409
|
Quote:
I don't get this at all... I really hope we don't get 17 couples this year, 15 seemed a bit much in the early weeks and I feel like an even longer series would possibly be milking it a bit too far. But if they are just going to make up the numbers in pro routines, why bother with the big press announcement, as they've had extra dancers before without giving them this level of attention?
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,122
|
I wonder if BBC had nothing to put on, on the 10th and 17th of September so maybe they have decided to have just 1 week to prepare for Week 1 rather than the normal 3. I know this has a 5% chance of happening but think about it.
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,853
|
I pray for 17 couples and a 15 week series pleeassse make this happen
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,656
|
Quote:
Double eliminations, or battle rounds like in The Voice?
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,185
|
I think it will be 15 and they will announce the two extras as part of the troupe - Jo was in opening routine etc but not paired up last year
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 10,467
|
Quote:
Sounds terrible to me! And I find it hard enough to remember everyone at the start with 15, not to mention how long the early shows are.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 643
|
Quote:
I think it will be 15 and they will announce the two extras as part of the troupe - Jo was in opening routine etc but not paired up last year
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 11,807
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strictly_fan;*****457
I think there will be 16 celebs and of the existing pros will sit out e.g. Anton or Brendan. They may do a slot on ITT like Joanne did last year. I hope that AJ and Chloe get celebs. Dancing in a troupe doesn't really show us what they are capable of. I think they will be great dancers and teachers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,217
|
I'm guessing that there will be 2 reserve pros who will cover for injuries and dance in the troupe. There have been a lot of pro injuries in recent seasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,439
|
Quote:
How different is teaching a celeb for Strictly compared to a lay dancer? I am asking in terms of technique. Surely the technical level of lets say a 36-40 scoring dance is vastly lower than a dance for competition. I am sure if Chloe and AJ partnered a celeb (probably not happening) then sure they have learnt enough to pass knowlege on.
And yes, AJ and Chloe, as experienced competitors, will have learnt more than enough. However, being able to dance is one thing; being able to teach is another, it takes training and experience. And teaching scd celebs is a world away from teaching a beginner in a studio who is aiming to learn to dance properly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,125
|
Quote:
It is not their dance experience in question just teaching experience, as AJ and Chloe were dancing in the amateur ranks and their young age would imagine their experience will be limited - it is vastly different competing to teaching and in the quick turn around atmosphere of strictly (different dance every week) then teaching experience is essential.
Quote:
How different is teaching a celeb for Strictly compared to a lay dancer? I am asking in terms of technique. Surely the technical level of lets say a 36-40 scoring dance is vastly lower than a dance for competition. I am sure if Chloe and AJ partnered a celeb (probably not happening) then sure they have learnt enough to pass knowlege on.
Its all very well knowing how to do something beautifully yourself. Its a whole different thing to get someone else doing it, especially someone who has none of the core skills to start with. You have to find a language with which to communicate, look for hooks to lock into to help them understand what you are asking them to do and help them understand what they are asking their body to do and to make it happen. Often these teaching skills involve the ability to empathise and very often they are skils that develop with experience. Not of dancing necessarily or even teaching, but the experience of human beings, how people learn, how they think, what motivates them, what deflates them and recognising that what works for one person won't work for another. I have been teaching Argentine Tango for 3 years now. I am not a particularly good dancer myself. I came to dance late in life and wouldn't win any prizes as a competitor or performer. But from my non dancing life I have developed skills that have allowed me to be quite successful as a teacher. For example I talk to my students to find hooks or transferable skills to help them. Sometimes it helps to build from something they know into the new skill they are learning. So if they have done martial arts they tend to have a sense of their own body in space (not everyone does) and this can be used to help to get their body to move in an Argentine Tango way. If they play a musical instrument they tend to get rythmn and timing so you can build from that. I even use the knowledge some of, especially, my male students have of physics and engineering to help them understand the dance through their own points of reference. I am not saying someone of 20 can't teach. Some no doubt will be able to. But as they have had less life exprience will, by and large, have fewer tools in their bag to enable them to instal what they know into the mind and body of someone who may be initially ill adapted for the task. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,185
|
aj does come from a dance background and his family do have a large dance school and he may well have teaching experience - will be interesting to see how it pans out
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,520
|
Quote:
aj does come from a dance background and his family do have a large dance school and he may well have teaching experience - will be interesting to see how it pans out
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,443
|
Exciting; highly qualified and wow 2 of them are quite young. I am really excited to see them this new season
.I am already familiar with Neil and he is amazing; I knew he would join sooner or later. Lol I dont know why this kind of reminded of dancing with the stars with the younger recruits lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,443
|
Quote:
3 British dancers!
That's one to make all the Brexiters happy, the ones who complain about "all these broody Russians", etc, etc, etc... ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,443
|
Wait...wait...wait...I just realised something; so this means that we will have 17 couples this season
![]() ![]() ; that's a lot
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,283
|
Quote:
Wait...wait...wait...I just realised something; so this means that we will have 17 couples this season
![]() ![]() ; that's a lot ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 25,713
|
backstageone said there will be a troupe this year, similar to what they have on DWTS. So I'm assuming that AJ and Chloe will be part of that.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:45.



)

, but it proves that young age is not exactly seen as an obstacle. I would be surprised if the young couple was already earmarked to be troupe-only, I rather think they do not have the line up 100% and want to keep their options open. Also, having more pros than celebs would make the pairing show a bit more interesting...
.
; that's a lot