This is the first year for me that the person I wanted to win actually won, and I was truly ecstatic when Emma called out Jason's name, as was my 25 year old son who has been as equally disgusted with Jason's treatment as I have.

I cannot abide to see a person singled out by a group of people, and that group included the producers themselves. They knew what they were doing the minute they decided it would be good tv to have both Jason and Charlie in the house together. Did he not make it clear in his VT how he felt regarding that relationship? They knew!! Charlie planted the initial seeds and watered them regularly. It makes me truly sick to my stomach to see someone targeted like that, and it got so much worse as time went on. TV or real life, its wrong. I have put myself in the firing line at my workplace (full of women) when someone has had a bee in their bonnet and rallied the troops into pack mentality, not because they themselves see those traits in their victim, but because their leader does. It's immature and pathetic, and anyone who condones that sort of behaviour may as well join the pack themselves.

Jason did absolutely nothing wrong, and thats the key here. He was a gentleman throughout the entire, skin crawling situation. So he lost it briefly after having a barrage of abuse thrown at him in the court trial, who wouldn't? Seriously, who wouldn't? I don't think I could have kept my cool for that long. They systematically tried to emotionally destroy him, and every part of it (IMO) can be traced back to Charlie and her game player comment, thats what they all latched on to. Who the hell is she anyway? She had the nerve to accuse Jason of ruining her time in the house? She wasn't even an original housemate, she was one of the others. He was the original, and she ruined his time in the house.

Most of the housemates this year have been truly vile, jumping on a fraught relationship's bandwagon and attempting to use it to their own gain. They lost, and rightly so. Good has finally triumphed over bad, the majority could see what was happening and made themselves heard.

Jason is a worthy winner.

bib - that's a good term for them. Yes, I agree with you they were more old-style housemates. I remember, for the first three weeks (barring the fact of the 'other' house) a lot of us were saying it was a bit more like old BB, in that (at that point) there hadn't been too much interference from BB, the nominations had all been in the DR and not aired to the house - for a while it was shaping up quite nicely.

Pre- and post-Charlie the show was not bad at all. As I know I keep saying, Lateysha being evicted was a game-changer for the house, and I think the last couple of weeks were good in many respects, with regards at least to the interaction amongst housemates, the change in people like Andy (how much more he relaxed after Lateysha left for example).

Have to say, it was a blessing the two twists I hated the sound of most on first finding out about them - the £20k/eviction and housemates evicting - turned out to be a bit of a blessing for getting rid of 2 housemates who were ruining my viewing pleasure

I did.be perplexed no more .

Absolutely.

Bad luck then as the show is coming back next year as registration for auditions has already opened

In my opinion, this is the post of the series. Great to have a ''ghost writer'', as you have said everything I wanted, only better, and saved me all the work!

They'll never see that, although it is glaringly obvious.

Thank you

Sympathy win vote for you then.

No its called having empathy...Its something that grown ups do.

Not at all. Had I not liked Jason I wouldn't have voted for him regardless. I still wouldn't have agreed with his treatment but he wouldn't have got my vote to win. Its quite immature to suggest that he only won because people felt sorry for him. Many many people actually liked him more than they liked the other housemates. Put his treatment to the side ..... he turned that game on its head like nobody else in there would ever have dared to do. Not everybody likes to watch screaming wannabe banshees all vying for as much camera time as they can possibly get.

What would be the reason any of them got votes? For being loud and obnoxious? For crying about their babies? For acceptance? For shouting over people? For intimate shenanigans under the duvet? For being skint? For thinking they have more right than anyone else to walk out as the winner? What?

He is a GOOD person who was treated appallingly.
Last edited by Ocean Breeze : 27-07-2016 at 13:10

yup.........

Jason's win puts me in mind of Brexit; and Donald Trump's popularity. I read a fascinating article recently in the New York Times about 'anti-politics Politics'. The was an anti-BB BB for the voters. Stick it to the establishment, sort of thing. See the bits in bold:







It's not the first time we've hand an 'anti' winner; but it should be recognised for what it was. It wasn't Jason's personality, per se; even though I thought he was a decent, if dreary, guy. It was the set-up; the Charlie carry-on and the 'bedroom bitches' who got a great deal more stick for their bitching than the smoking bench bitches did.




Bit in bold - but did that not make you suspicious? I'm re-evaluating the whole Jason/Charlie thing. His exit interviews indicated that he still has feelings for her and, against the fervent wishes of most DS posters, Charlie wasn't upset or distraught that he won - she was delighted.

I have a strong, strong sense that there's a reconciliation on the cards. It will be interesting to see how DS take it if it does happen.

Maybe he won because he's NOT a trouble raising bitch?

Exactly!!

Middle aged women that fancy him.

People that like to vote for 'the victim'

Those that like the protest/gameplayer vote.

Together with those that didn't like the popular cliche.

Sadly combined...... makes a undeserving/won by default winner.

So that's why Belo won. We're discussing Jason though

Nah, he was normal, decent and identifiable to people with a few years behind them..

there has been SO many shallow and vile people with other agendas on bb and people are sick of them

Why is it sad or a win by default?

Everyone who votes has their reasons for voting. You pay your money and vote for whichever housemate you want, for whatever reason you think is worth the price of the vote.

It's not like some people are more worthy of a being able to vote than others.

b

Are you dim? He had the most votes. It's quite simple .

Please don't be silly. Charlie and Letesya got voted out. Nobody won it for him but Jason himself .

He deserved to win, and he deserved that win because the majority of the public paid to help him walk through that door last. No matter what reasons spurred those votes, he won it fair and square, and deservedly so. Just because he wasn't your winner, does not make him undeserving.

Well, you see ... the producers allow the public to call in and vote for who they want to win. And when they counted up all the votes, Jason had the most.

Guess the public preferred a nice guy with integrity to a self-centered, moronic child.

Who knew?

I'm surprised people aren't asking for another vote like with the Brexit farce 😂😂

Exactly and that helped him to a big degree in winning it.