• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • General Discussion Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Chatter
The soap section through the night thread
<<
<
563 of 585
>>
>
attitude99
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by TheGraduate2012:
“The 30th anniversary was very well done although, ultimately, I found Who Killed Lucy? to be a let-down, mostly because of the length of time the storyline was dragged out for and because of DTC's over-enthusiastic proclamations of how game-changing it would be for the whole Square. Honestly, I'd rather have a full year of SOC's recent work than a year of the Beales all shooting each other furtive, open-mouthed glances.

The best thing I've noticed about SOC (so far, anyway) is that he doesn't appear to have favourites like DTC did. It makes me laugh that everyone is pining for DTC now, considering how they did nothing but bitch and moan about the overused Carters for two years.

Phil's 'falling off the wagon' being an revenge act on Gavin's part seemed so comically blase that I can almost guarantee that DTC did not intend to grow it into a cirrhosis storyline. Also, if you notice, the characters never mention this now. During all these tough conversations between Phil and Sharon, you'd expect Phil to, at least once, mention that it was her father who put him in his current state. Seems to me that SOC would sooner forget that particular plot point.

Oh dear, I imagine DTC had a, not at all predictable, Gavin return planned for Christmas Day, topped off with a showdown between him and Darth Ronnie on NYE

I meant subtle BUT noticeable, by the way

Totally. And, as we've said before, the Vic break-in was so much more unexpected and shocking because of SOC's work building up the Carters relationships again. I also had a thought tonight about Whitney and Mick, they had a nice little scene again. All DTC ever had them doing was Whitney throwing herself at Mick.

You're right actually. Remember I said that to you a few weeks ago? The pool death seems so un-SOC it's ridiculous. I even initially thought it was something DTC had pre-planned and they had to go ahead with ”

Live week was great and it was good because DTC was a huge fan of the show himself, something which became a nuisance in the coming months. Whilst Bobby being revealed as the killer was shocking, you couldn't help but think how ridiculous it was and it got even worse when half the square covered it up 'for the greater good'.

Yes, that has definitely been evident, EastEnders is once more an ensemble show and more or less everyone has been given their own story that is either stand alone or links into someone else's. I find it funny how people are practically begging DTC to come back, when actually he can stay away, this time last year I was on the verge of giving up EastEnders completely because I felt there was no way back for it once Kathy had come back and the ludicrous storylines between the Hubbards. Comedy Gavin and the Mitchells. I am cringing now at the ridiculous Halloween episode where Gavin lurked and held everyone hostage in the kitchen, that was unintentionally funny beyond belief.

That's true, Phil and Sharon haven't mentioned Gavin since he was arrested. It's good that horrific story has been put to bed, it needs to be forgotten and fast. Same with Claudette and the 'Dust from the vacuum cleaner' episodes.

I shudder at what EE would be like now if DTC was still here, probably like you say a Gavin return being the Christmas highlight. It's weird to think that this year the show has had two very different executive producers at the helm, and I really hope SOC makes 2017 great, it needs to be and I really feel he knows more than what he lets on. There have been signs of brilliance from him, and the little things like attention to detail are practically faultless (bar the same phone numbers thing but that's unimportant).

I agree, to be instantly thrown from a happy episode into a dark and terrifying situation was shocking and unpredictable. At one point I would have been on the side of the robbers, but because of the period where we have began to care for the characters again we were fearful for the Carters.

Yeah I do remember you saying about it, it seems so un-SOC to do a sensational pool drowning death, I don't know how they are going to exit and it is going to be great having to guess until it happens.
RickLopez
23-12-2016
As well as EE being more of an ensemble, I think that's one of Corrie's improvements under KO, the wider cast is being utilised much more.
TheGraduate2012
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by attitude99:
“Live week was great and it was good because DTC was a huge fan of the show himself, something which became a nuisance in the coming months. Whilst Bobby being revealed as the killer was shocking, you couldn't help but think how ridiculous it was and it got even worse when half the square covered it up 'for the greater good'.

Yes, that has definitely been evident, EastEnders is once more an ensemble show and more or less everyone has been given their own story that is either stand alone or links into someone else's. I find it funny how people are practically begging DTC to come back, when actually he can stay away, this time last year I was on the verge of giving up EastEnders completely because I felt there was no way back for it once Kathy had come back and the ludicrous storylines between the Hubbards. Comedy Gavin and the Mitchells. I am cringing now at the ridiculous Halloween episode where Gavin lurked and held everyone hostage in the kitchen, that was unintentionally funny beyond belief.

That's true, Phil and Sharon haven't mentioned Gavin since he was arrested. It's good that horrific story has been put to bed, it needs to be forgotten and fast. Same with Claudette and the 'Dust from the vacuum cleaner' episodes.

I shudder at what EE would be like now if DTC was still here, probably like you say a Gavin return being the Christmas highlight. It's weird to think that this year the show has had two very different executive producers at the helm, and I really hope SOC makes 2017 great, it needs to be and I really feel he knows more than what he lets on. There have been signs of brilliance from him, and the little things like attention to detail are practically faultless (bar the same phone numbers thing but that's unimportant).

I agree, to be instantly thrown from a happy episode into a dark and terrifying situation was shocking and unpredictable. At one point I would have been on the side of the robbers, but because of the period where we have began to care for the characters again we were fearful for the Carters.

Yeah I do remember you saying about it, it seems so un-SOC to do a sensational pool drowning death, I don't know how they are going to exit and it is going to be great having to guess until it happens. ”


I felt a bit cheated by the Bobby reveal. Although it was shocking, I think DTC had built it up so much that it felt really anti-climatic. I think SOC would've given us better 'hints' although the way of Bobby's unravelling mental state and better scenes between him and Jane. To top things off, Jane's actions were completely unjustifiable no matter how hard DTC tried to redeem her.

Yes, definitely. It feels very much like an ensemble show now. I got this feeling from the Christmas trailer. It doesn't feel like any one character/family owns the show, which is great because no single character should be irreplaceable to a good writer. Again, even though there's nothing 'major' happening in the trailer, it all seems to be very good personal drama. God, I hope SOC gets to do a two-hander at some point.

DTC could have at least cast a convincing actor as Gavin. Truly pathetic.

'Dust from the vacuum cleaner' Remember her Edward Scissorhands moment with the turkey slicer as well? Characters such as Claudette, Ronnie and Vincent have been dialled WAY down by SOC. I think I will even be a little sad when Ronnie is killed off as she has been written much better lately, especially considering it's coming up for her annual 'Crazy Season' Even Roxy's typical deadbeat mother routine is more believable as she genuinely thinks she's doing what's best for Amy by having Ronnie adopt her.
TheGraduate2012
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by RickLopez:
“As well as EE being more of an ensemble, I think that's one of Corrie's improvements under KO, the wider cast is being utilised much more.”

Definitely. Even though some of the plots right now are a bit iffy (Maria and Aidan) it seems a lot more characters are getting screen time.

Also, she got rid of Les Dennis
Keyser_Soze1
23-12-2016
For any fans of the Philth - be warned - I will be sending the lads round to have a little word...

http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s...aptorshark.jpg
attitude99
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by TheGraduate2012:
“I felt a bit cheated by the Bobby reveal. Although it was shocking, I think DTC had built it up so much that it felt really anti-climatic. I think SOC would've given us better 'hints' although the way of Bobby's unravelling mental state and better scenes between him and Jane. To top things off, Jane's actions were completely unjustifiable no matter how hard DTC tried to redeem her.

Yes, definitely. It feels very much like an ensemble show now. I got this feeling from the Christmas trailer. It doesn't feel like any one character/family owns the show, which is great because no single character should be irreplaceable to a good writer. Again, even though there's nothing 'major' happening in the trailer, it all seems to be very good personal drama. God, I hope SOC gets to do a two-hander at some point.

DTC could have at least cast a convincing actor as Gavin. Truly pathetic

'Dust from the vacuum cleaner' Remember her Edward Scissorhands moment with the turkey slicer as well? Characters such as Claudette, Ronnie and Vincent have been dialled WAY down by SOC. I think I will even be a little sad when Ronnie is killed off as she has been written much better lately, especially considering it's coming up for her annual 'Crazy Season' Even Roxy's typical deadbeat mother routine is more believable as she genuinely thinks she's doing what's best for Amy by having Ronnie adopt her.”

I agree, it was built up and hyped up to the max and was a bit of an anticlimax, especially considering the story had been building for ten months. Also, some questions were never answered like Billy being part of the whole thing and having a 'thing' for Lucy *boaks*

Hopefully this Christmas isn't dominated by one family. In 2014, it was the Carters, 2015, the Mitchells and Beales, so hopefully this year will be a lot like 2013 which got the balance spot on imo. All of the drama is very character based and led, the best kind to be honest and it is all about how it affects the characters and how they deal with these situations. Again, thinking of Phil's scenes tonight, it was about him losing his hard persona and masculinity and being the 'top dog', like when he was describing wanting to put those drunk city boys in their place but he couldn't because of his deteriorating health. That was a very interesting insight and his monologue was all about how the hardman had worn away.

A two hander from SOC would be very interesting, especially considering he was most likely behind the Kat/Zoe two hander from 2001 which was excellent. This type of character led drama is what makes two hander episodes so good and we haven't had one since 2010!

"Dust from under our feet" Ronnie in particular has become much more family based now she has three kids to look after with Jack. Roxy's development has been good as well as she is made to feel that giving Amy away is the best thing like you say above. Her retreating back to alcohol and drugs has also been interesting plot development, and as a side note I like how the drug dealer is a woman not a man.
RickLopez
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by TheGraduate2012:
“Definitely. Even though some of the plots right now are a bit iffy (Maria and Aidan) it seems a lot more characters are getting screen time.

Also, she got rid of Les Dennis ”

I thought that was Phelan?

I think Phelan should be the producer of all soaps.
RickLopez
23-12-2016
I think we need a Dot-esque episode where it's just Phil and the camera and he regales us about his past thug life.

And all the pubs closing.
attitude99
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by RickLopez:
“As well as EE being more of an ensemble, I think that's one of Corrie's improvements under KO, the wider cast is being utilised much more.”

Yes, this has been a noticeable improvement under KO, at least most episodes aren't a Carla v Tracy yawnfest now.
Keyser_Soze1
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by RickLopez:
“I think we need a Dot-esque episode where it's just Phil and the camera and he regales us about his past thug life.

And all the pubs closing.”

I had to laugh when he remembered the 'good old days' of inflicting casual and brutal violence on anyone who looked at his pint in a funny way.
TheGraduate2012
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by attitude99:
“I agree, it was built up and hyped up to the max and was a bit of an anticlimax, especially considering the story had been building for ten months. Also, some questions were never answered like Billy being part of the whole thing and having a 'thing' for Lucy *boaks*

Hopefully this Christmas isn't dominated by one family. In 2014, it was the Carters, 2015, the Mitchells and Beales, so hopefully this year will be a lot like 2013 which got the balance spot on imo. All of the drama is very character based and led, the best kind to be honest and it is all about how it affects the characters and how they deal with these situations. Again, thinking of Phil's scenes tonight, it was about him losing his hard persona and masculinity and being the 'top dog', like when he was describing wanting to put those drunk city boys in their place but he couldn't because of his deteriorating health. That was a very interesting insight and his monologue was all about how the hardman had worn away.

A two hander from SOC would be very interesting, especially considering he was most likely behind the Kat/Zoe two hander from 2001 which was excellent. This type of character led drama is what makes two hander episodes so good and we haven't had one since 2010!

"Dust from under our feet" Ronnie in particular has become much more family based now she has three kids to look after with Jack. Roxy's development has been good as well as she is made to feel that giving Amy away is the best thing like you say above. Her retreating back to alcohol and drugs has also been interesting plot development, and as a side note I like how the drug dealer is a woman not a man. ”

Oh pu-lease! That Billy 'involvement' was so unnecessary. DTC got completely carried away with these stupid red-herrings. Same went for Jake, Ben and Jay.

I notice that the Carters are in the Vic for Christmas dinner, which must mean something goes wrong for Lee and Whitney. I'm expecting a Mitchell/Carter split for most of it, as I can't imagine the Fowlers having much drama.

Phil's monologue was great. My biggest hope for him is that, when he recovers, he gives up on the hardman routine completely. Ben's recent loss of Paul/coming to terms with being gay coupled with Phil's illness and R&R's upcoming deaths should fundamentally change his character.

You'd think, anyway

6 years and no two-hander!? That's mad, we're long overdue. SOC would be brilliant if he was behind the Kat/Zoe one. A Phil/Denise one would be good right now. I'm looking forward to the Dot/Phil scenes on Christmas.

True. Roxy's turning to drugs feels more sad and defeatist rather than her typically irresponsible behaviour. It's like she can recognise Ronnie and Jack coming back from their mistakes but she doesn't know how to do the same

Originally Posted by RickLopez:
“I thought that was Phelan?

I think Phelan should be the producer of all soaps.”

I'm Phelan that idea a lot
xItzDannyx
23-12-2016


This is my new most used emoji.
TheGraduate2012
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by Keyser_Soze1:
“I had to laugh when he remembered the 'good old days' of inflicting casual and brutal violence on anyone who looked at his pint in a funny way. ”

I agree, but it kind of highlighted what a pathetic excuse for a man Phil is
attitude99
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by TheGraduate2012:
“Oh pu-lease! That Billy 'involvement' was so unnecessary. DTC got completely carried away with these stupid red-herrings. Same went for Jake, Ben and Jay.

I notice that the Carters are in the Vic for Christmas dinner, which must mean something goes wrong for Lee and Whitney. I'm expecting a Mitchell/Carter split for most of it, as I can't imagine the Fowlers having much drama.

Phil's monologue was great. My biggest hope for him is that, when he recovers, he gives up on the hardman routine completely. Ben's recent loss of Paul/coming to terms with being gay coupled with Phil's illness and R&R's upcoming deaths should fundamentally change his character.

You'd think, anyway

6 years and no two-hander!? That's mad, we're long overdue. SOC would be brilliant if he was behind the Kat/Zoe one. A Phil/Denise one would be good right now. I'm looking forward to the Dot/Phil scenes on Christmas.

True. Roxy's turning to drugs feels more sad and defeatist rather than her typically irresponsible behaviour. It's like she can recognise Ronnie and Jack coming back from their mistakes but she doesn't know how to do the same ”

Getting carried away with the red herrings meant unanswered questions, that are still unanswered now. Forget that though, I want to know why Billy was stealing the post!

It's quite exciting to wonder who's dinner gets ruined. I'm thinking the Carters but it could go either way. It would be brilliant to see Phil change and become more of a patriarchal role, a bit like a male Pauline or Pat.

Yes, that long there was loads in the 2000's, so can't think why the last one was the Stacey/Max one in March 2010.

It is sad to see Roxy hit self destruct, but this time it is for her feeling she can't look after her own daughter. Quite a sad psychological development really but probably necessary for their exit story, however it plays out.

TheGraduate2012
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by attitude99:
“Getting carried away with the red herrings meant unanswered questions, that are still unanswered now. Forget that though, I want to know why Billy was stealing the post!

It's quite exciting to wonder who's dinner gets ruined. I'm thinking the Carters but it could go either way. It would be brilliant to see Phil change and become more of a patriarchal role, a bit like a male Pauline or Pat.

Yes, that long there was loads in the 2000's, so can't think why the last one was the Stacey/Max one in March 2010.

It is sad to see Roxy hit self destruct, but this time it is for her feeling she can't look after her own daughter. Quite a sad psychological development really but probably necessary for their exit story, however it plays out.”

One of life's most irritating and unanswered questions. The writers must've realised how ridiculous that 'plot' was and swiftly abandoned it

Yes, that's what I think. He doesn't have to become a saint, but at least stop trying to keep him as a middle-aged gangster. The problem is with EE, they've never really known how to write patriarchs. Men are usually thugs, serial shaggers or wimps.

I can't believe it's been that long. I wish the Whitney/Kat-centric episode had been a complete 2-hander.

Agreed. Roxy's default setting is to go into self-destruct mode, but at least this time she's took her own daughter into consideration first. As she said the other night, she never did that previously and, instead, brought a whole load of danger into Amy's life.
attitude99
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by TheGraduate2012:
“One of life's most irritating and unanswered questions. The writers must've realised how ridiculous that 'plot' was and swiftly abandoned it

Yes, that's what I think. He doesn't have to become a saint, but at least stop trying to keep him as a middle-aged gangster. The problem is with EE, they've never really known how to write patriarchs. Men are usually thugs, serial shaggers or wimps.

I can't believe it's been that long. I wish the Whitney/Kat-centric episode had been a complete 2-hander.

Agreed. Roxy's default setting is to go into self-destruct mode, but at least this time she's took her own daughter into consideration first. As she said the other night, she never did that previously and, instead, brought a whole load of danger into Amy's life.”

Much like other storylines of the Newman era

It would be great to see Phil enter a new life stage as opposed to being top dog all the time. This current storylines has shown glimpses of old Phil who was lost under wife beating, abusive and addicted Phil. Even though he is still detestable to say the least.

That was a really decent episode, the scenes between the two were excellent and I agree it should have been a two hander as it was a classic EE ep.

True and I agree, at least Roxy remembered she has a daughter this time around and believes it is best for her to be with 'perfect couple' Darth Ronnie and Vintage Jack.
RickLopez
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by xItzDannyx:
“

This is my new most used emoji.”

Mine's still . I ain't budging just because a load of new fangled ones come out

Originally Posted by TheGraduate2012:
“I agree, but it kind of highlighted what a pathetic excuse for a man Phil is ”

Do you want him to die over Christmas?
TheGraduate2012
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by attitude99:
“Much like other storylines of the Newman era

It would be great to see Phil enter a new life stage as opposed to being top dog all the time. This current storylines has shown glimpses of old Phil who was lost under wife beating, abusive and addicted Phil. Even though he is still detestable to say the least.

That was a really decent episode, the scenes between the two were excellent and I agree it should have been a two hander as it was a classic EE ep.

True and I agree, at least Roxy remembered she has a daughter this time around and believes it is best for her to be with 'perfect couple' Darth Ronnie and Vintage Jack. ”

They dragged on his 'King' status for a ridiculously long time. Any reasonably fit 20-odd year old man could've made mincemeat of him years ago Remember when Big Gay Christian thumped him?

Pity it had the Ginger Whinger in it

I think SOC is trying to erase Darth Ronnie and Vintage Jack (aka Bonnie and Clyde) from out memories

Originally Posted by RickLopez:
“Do you want him to die over Christmas?”

No, not particularly. I want him to survive and then grow into a decent human being EE needs a decent patriarch.
xItzDannyx
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by RickLopez:
“Mine's still . I ain't budging just because a load of new fangled ones come out ”

and are the Emoji's that describe my life
xItzDannyx
23-12-2016
Not enough smut and bad language tonight, you lot are slacking. Can't go slacking at Christmas!
Keyser_Soze1
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by RickLopez:
“Mine's still . I ain't budging just because a load of new fangled ones come out



Do you want him to die over Christmas?”

I wanted Steve Owen to kill him in 2001.
Aaron_Silver
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by xItzDannyx:
“Not enough smut and bad language tonight, you lot are slacking. Can't go slacking at Christmas!”

Are you in need of a lollipop? Something of luxurious length that you can suck on between your blonde moments
xItzDannyx
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by Aaron_Silver:
“Are you in need of a lollipop? Something of luxurious length that you can suck on between your blonde moments ”

Well actually I've been laughing at an image I've found. It shows me and Atti running from you and Grad.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/06/27/16/35B9303200000578-3662417-Fizzarina_gave_the_image_the_royal_treatment_by_replacing_the_fe-m-49_1467041001536.jpg
TheGraduate2012
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by Aaron_Silver:
“Are you in need of a lollipop? Something of luxurious length that you can suck on between your blonde moments ”

Can I 'like' this?

Originally Posted by xItzDannyx:
“Well actually I've been laughing at an image I've found. It shows me and Atti running from you and Grad.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...7041001536.jpg”

So, f*cking low
RickLopez
23-12-2016
Originally Posted by xItzDannyx:
“ and are the Emoji's that describe my life ”



Originally Posted by Aaron_Silver:
“Are you in need of a lollipop? Something of luxurious length that you can suck on between your blonde moments ”

Filth.

Originally Posted by TheGraduate2012:
“No, not particularly. I want him to survive and then grow into a decent human being EE needs a decent patriarch.”

Phil, grow into a decent human being?

Me neither
<<
<
563 of 585
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map