Patronising, immature and childish, I think c5 should get rid of rylan clark-neal. He makes bbbots all about him and when he says something is amazing we deem as rubbish, he deems things which are bad as great. About time Ben frow had the balls to terminate his contract; he's not really wanted by viewers or hms on bb or cbb, he's more suited to the xtra factor. No wonder why Emma flounders sometimes with rylan as her sidekick.

Emma and Rylan are great......Rylan is superb. And Emma is the most beautiful women on TV!

Rylan's an absolute natural as a presenter. I personally think he's better than Emma.

Natural - Superb summarization.....The man is a 'natural' presenter. And he knows his audience. He's an easy watch. He's a welcome watch.

Honestly, people will laugh now, but Rylan will reach the top when it comes to presenting one day. He truly is a Natural!

Teeth is horrid. He belongs with Zezi, wherever she might be.

You've made me laugh, you really have.

You're welcome.....

How droll. Maybe you can be Andy on the next BB Meanwhile I will look forward to seeing Rylan presenting BOTS and This Morning and the rest

Nice to see some good things being said about Rylan. He can be funny and is FAR better than Emma was on BOTS. She was unbearable at times.

I totally agree I dont like the RYLAN show i think its total rubbish and should be got rid of i am sick of seeing the same audience night after night and Rylans stupid games get rid of BBBOT`S ( SOTS ) and give us live feed instead ,
Dont waste viewing time with Rylans rubbish .

Keep Rylan.

I never liked Rylan but since his teeth have been toned down and I can actually concentrate on HIM I think he's absolutely perfect for BB and extremely good at his job.

Rylan will probably take over the main show soon, as Emma is getting too old to present it. Maybe then BOTTS will die a natural death and be replaced with live feed.

He might be a good presenter but on TV there are many times I haven't a clue as to what he is saying... and it is not just the crowd noise drowning him out,,, I think it is his teeth getting in the way.

Did one poster say Rylan could reach the top as a presenter? What exactly does that mean, Question Time and Panorama or Lip Sync and Take me out?

In order to process as a serious presenter/interviewer Rylan needs to correct his Grammar and use of slang. Tone down the Essex dialect. He needs to calm down and pronounce all his words clearly. But the most obvious barrier to being taken seriously is to stop presuming airtime means Rylan time.

rylan is perfect for milkshake shows... not adult ones.

he can't interview.
he cant "time" the "turn to the audience for a whoop" gimmick

i don't watch anything he is on.... but that means i am not the sho's target and it isnt made for me - that i accept... but if c5 dump him then i will give bbots another go... if they made rylan the evict show host i would stop watching the evictions.

Rylan should be the main presenter! He's awesome.

I'm not particularly a fan of Rylan as such, but I would really rather he remain the BOTS presenter than somebody new.

For me a lot of BB is about familiarity and also knowing that the presenters are 'fans' of the show in some way - which Rylan definitely is. His enthusiasm for Big Brother is one thing I do like about him. I don't know who else they could get to do the show who was a fan - although I do like Liam Mcgough for it if a new presenter were to be chosen.

I know he makes the show all about him often - so did Russell Brand - but he's also quite likeable to me. BOTS was never going to be - or meant to be - high brow.

What I do wish they would do is shake up the panel a bit and bring on some fresh meat, so to speak - that's nothing to do with Rylan of course.

ETA: And the audience - for heavens sakes, give us fresh people!

I've stopped watching BBBOTS because of the awful presenter.
Ironically when Emma did most of it a few years ago I thought it was better then the main show.

It may be they are finding only certain people will agree to appear on the show because of the presenter-only the booker will know and even then not for sure as someone who declines won't give the real reason.

Personally I think the panel is determined by how much they pay them and how much people need the money, nothing much more than that - it's a paying job for some who need it more than others, which is why it's low-end (in my opinion)

some people are very easy to please it seems i cannot stand him myself nor his sidekick dan

the screeching clown is annoying. there is absolutely nothing intellectual coming out of his mouth... if bright flashing lights and beeps and ooohs are your thing... then standing too close to a fruit machine is what you want and not a tv set tbh

Obviously the main driver is money but on the assumption it is fairly low paid then a degree of exposure comes into it and whether it's enjoyable as well.The latter reasons are more likely for someone like Emma rather than the current incumbent.

I can't watch BOTS anymore because I find Rylan so irritating. He is like a caricature of Kenneth Williams on steroids. A good presenter would make it all about the guests, but he wants to hog the limelight. He is Ryan with more charm. I just find him so unfunny and all his guests fall in the same Kerry Katona/TOWIE/intellect of an acorn catergory. I would scrap BOTS and bring back a BBLB style programme, which was great. We got to see footage from the house, have interviews with friends and family, behaviour/psych analysis of HMs - much more interesting.