Originally Posted by digichant:
“Maybe, but it's just the impression I've got from a fair few posts on here. Of course there are some reasoned responses about why people really loved Jason as an individual, but the vast majority of posts about him tend to just be anti-Charlie, anti-Ryan or anti-producers rather than significantly pro-Jason.
Would he have won based on his own merit without the influence of campaigns against other housemates? Or even without the protest against the very recent courtroom task? I really doubt it, and I think his winners interview was evidence enough of his lack of character.”
That's fair enough but when the majority
are saying they didn't vote him to win out of sympathy it's bloody annoying and frustrating when people say "Yeah they did, they just won't admit it". It's like the whole 'jealousy' thing we usually get every year with some female housemates.
In all honesty very few actually win these days based on their own merit, if you like. There is always some anti agenda to varying degrees.
Maybe he wouldn't have pipped Hughie to the post without the courtroom task but it is situations which drive all housemates to the forefront, allowing us to see sides to them which we wouldn't otherwise which we either admire or dislike about them.