• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Hughie - 'Lateysha or I would have been a more worthy winner than Jason'
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
Pollyusa
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by Cheetah666:
“You'd win that bet! The writer of the article has even posted on this page to clarify that he did not say that he was a more worthy winner, and just look at the post above yours.

Such people vote in things more important than BB. ”

The author said he used "worthy" winner, rather than "deserving" winner. I think deserving winner sounds worse actually. The author did Hughie a favor
JT Effect
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by MommaBb:
“
You're in work and there's a promotion available, between you and the person who caused your 2 friends to get sacked, the person gets the promotion, are you gonna say they deserved the promotion over you?”

How did this person get my two mates the sack? (I'm all about the detail )

No - I might not say they deserved the promotion over me (or I might, because they might be sh*t hot at their job) but what I wouldn't do is to state in the office that I deserved the promotion over said colleague - because it both makes me look a bit of a bitter t**t, and it implies I think my managers (who pay my wages) are wrong.
JT Effect
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by Pollyusa:
“The author said he used "worthy" winner, rather than "deserving" winner. I think deserving winner sounds worse actually. The author did Hughie a favor”

I think 'deserving' sounds worse than worthy too.
tabithakitten
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by JT Effect:
“How did this person get my two mates the sack? (I'm all about the detail )

No - I might not say they deserved the promotion over me (or I might, because they might be sh*t hot at their job) but what I wouldn't do is to state in the office that I deserved the promotion over said colleague - because it both makes me look a bit of a bitter t**t, and it implies I think my managers (who pay my wages) are wrong.”

How did they get them the sack?

In the first case, they took advantage of an opportunity given to all employees, guessing that they themselves would be at risk of unemployment should they not do so.

In the second case, they collaborated with other employees on instruction from management to decide on the fate of someone already deemed a weak link by a large third party.

Vicky8675309
27-07-2016
Deserving sounds much worse than worthy. Deserving seems to go with entitled
Heatherbell
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by JT Effect:
“I think 'deserving' sounds worse than worthy too.”

In the end it's just Hughie having another stroppy tantrum , but thankfully we can avoid seeing it and just laugh at his over inflated sense of the importance and belief that lying on a bed farting and eating choc digestives or having sex on telly entitles one to win £70k over someone who has faced many obstacles and come out sane and pleasant and kindly .
I bet baby Hughie was stamping his little feet and jumping on furniture all through his interview .
EnricoIV
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“It's disappointing that the three vipers have got to him already.”

Nobody "got to him." This is who he is. This is who he's been since he walked in the door. And that's why those "vipers" were, and are, his besties.

I just think it's such a shame that more people couldn't see it. He may have seemed a bit more tolerable towards the end, since his "vipers" weren't there to join in.

He's a nasty, vile piece of work.
Salv*
27-07-2016
Either way. He just needs to get away from the others bdcusse he seemed genuinely happy last night. I can only think of one reason why he'd change his tune as soon as he came out...hmm Ryan.

He gets too influenced. But still stand by him and Jason being my Top 2 ever.

Something I think won't be surpassed ever again.
JT Effect
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by tabithakitten:
“How did they get them the sack?

In the first case, they took advantage of an opportunity given to all employees, guessing that they themselves would be at risk of unemployment should they not do so.

In the second case, they collaborated with other employees on instruction from management to decide on the fate of someone already deemed a weak link by a large third party.

”

Good one!
EnricoIV
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by jp761:
“Well with articles, different posters who have read the whole damn thing, still are seeing different things now.

Oh well I definitely can't be naffed to read it all now. ”

I know. Having some actual knowledge would be so inhibiting to expressing an opinion, wouldn't it?
Pollyusa
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by MommaBb:
“Final 2 between you and someone you don't like, are you gonna think they should have won over you? Of course not.

If your in school and theres an award for pupil of the year, its between you and someone who made your 2 friends leave the school so you don't like them. They get the award, are you going to say they deserved it over you?


You're in work and there's a promotion available, between you and the person who caused your 2 friends to get sacked, the person gets the promotion, are you gonna say they deserved the promotion over you?

I could post these scenarios all day long and wheather people admit it or not they would never think a person they didn't like deserved the prize more than themselves.”


Perhaps, but the mark of a good sport is the one who keeps their mouth shut. Bitter, sour grapes is never a good look
MommaBb
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by EnricoIV:
“Nobody "got to him." This is who he is. This is who he's been since he walked in the door. And that's why those "vipers" were, and are, his besties.

I just think it's such a shame that more people couldn't see it. He may have seemed a bit more tolerable towards the end, since his "vipers" weren't there to join in.

He's a nasty, vile piece of work.”


Do you know Hughie? NO YOU DO NOT! Well I do, and I can tell you now he I'd far from nasty and vile. This is who he is, no this is your opinion of someone you don't know except for a heavily edited hour long TV show.
Hot Butterfly
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“It's disappointing that the three vipers have got to him already.”

He hasn't yet got the strength of character to work things out for himself. He will though.
jp761
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by EnricoIV:
“I know. Having some actual knowledge would be so inhibiting to expressing an opinion, wouldn't it? ”

Knowledge is one thing. Personal interpretation is another.
Rosie50
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze:
“This is the problem with today's potential housemates. They think the majority want to see attention seeking, screaming in peoples faces, almost naked twerking, sex blah blah. Their own ridiculous and over inflated egos cloud their judgement so much that they can't for the life of them fathom how an "ordinary" guy walked away as the winner.”

This, well said Ocean
Rosie50
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by MommaBb:
“Do you know Hughie? NO YOU DO NOT! Well I do, and I can tell you now he I'd far from nasty and vile. This is who he is, no this is your opinion of someone you don't know except for a heavily edited hour long TV show.”

Hi Momma are you Hughies Mom
SH1965
27-07-2016
The bitter bedroom bitches really need to get over themselves and move on
Salv*
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by SH1965:
“The bitter bedroom itches really need to.to get over themselves and move on”

They have 'gotten over it' if you look at Twitter and read the answers that Andy is giving on Twitter; EVERYONE is friends and getting on and the articles are not the full story.

But people are believing articles over actual answers from Jason, Andy and everyone who was present last night.
kat_mieoww
27-07-2016
Bitter little no mark..harhar suck it up .It's a frickin game show not a charity auction.
karl_kennedy
27-07-2016
Do one slaphead...you shouldn't haven't been anywhere near the final....count yourself lucky
Salv*
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by karl_kennedy:
“Do one slaphead...you shouldn't haven't been anywhere near the final....count yourself lucky”

Course he should have. All the finalists deserved to be there over most evicted hms. They all deserved it.
Rocket Queen
27-07-2016
Oh ffs, suck it up buttercups, the best one won, I wish him all the best, the other housemates won't be remembered, part from laura, you go girl and said Jason was a game player, and you shagged Marco in the first week, that's what you'll be remember for, already forgotten the rest, good on ya Jason xx
karl_kennedy
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“Course he should have. All the finalists deserved to be there over most evicted hms. They all deserved it.”

In my opinion he shouldn't have....a volatile bullyboy who should have been given the elbow early doors.......anyway, makes not a jot of difference. he lost....Jason won....happy days
Salv*
27-07-2016
Originally Posted by karl_kennedy:
“In my opinion he shouldn't have....a volatile bullyboy who should have been given the elbow early doors.......anyway, makes not a jot of difference. he lost....Jason won....happy days ”

OK.

Hughie is happy for him though but whatever. If you believe articles over the actual hms take on what happened last night, more fool you

karl_kennedy
28-07-2016
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“OK.

Hughie is happy for him though but whatever. If you believe articles over the actual hms take on what happened last night, more fool you

”



didn't read the article...not arsed what it says...never want to hear a word out of his annoying foghorn mouth ever again......my point was in response to seeing his name...and it still stands, regardless
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map