Originally Posted by bu:
“'Twas two years ago when Eileen lost against Joel.”
“'Twas two years ago when Eileen lost against Joel.”
Thought it was a while ago. We have 3 shows a year now so thought it had to be a bit back.
BB Producers Playing With Noms Again!!!
2 of 2
Originally Posted by atko:
“Exactly! They are not bothered about the behaviour element....the more controversial the better. There will be a split audience for & against him which will result in a Social Media meltdown. As Bovey is unlikely to raise even a sentence they will be happy for him to go anyway.”
“Exactly! They are not bothered about the behaviour element....the more controversial the better. There will be a split audience for & against him which will result in a Social Media meltdown. As Bovey is unlikely to raise even a sentence they will be happy for him to go anyway.”
I wonder if Anthea Turner has refused to appear on BOTS whilst he is still in the house and therefore up for discussion? She has appeared several times in the past so it could be the case.
I just thought i would check up on how the series is going on here and it seem's like i made the correct decision giving up this show. Manipulation is the biggest reason why have given up on BB now. The whole show is a complete fix, i don't know how people are still putting up with it, especially the people that actually vote.
Fecken BB again messing about to protect SL's
No wonder I and many many others keep our cash in our pockets.
No wonder I and many many others keep our cash in our pockets.
Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“I wonder if Anthea Turner has refused to appear on BOTS whilst he is still in the house and therefore up for discussion? She has appeared several times in the past so it could be the case.”
“I wonder if Anthea Turner has refused to appear on BOTS whilst he is still in the house and therefore up for discussion? She has appeared several times in the past so it could be the case.”
I read they still get on. She advised him not to drink too much whilst he was in there. They are apparently on speaking terms.
Originally Posted by atko:
“I read they still get on. She advised him not to drink too much whilst he was in there. They are apparently on speaking terms.”
“I read they still get on. She advised him not to drink too much whilst he was in there. They are apparently on speaking terms.”
I didn't know that - I knew she was still in touch with her step daughters though.
Originally Posted by bananaman_007:
“The rules have been if you get 3 or more votes you are up, so why should this be any different?”
“The rules have been if you get 3 or more votes you are up, so why should this be any different?”
Exactly! Bear & Lewis are the instigators of everything that goes on right now in the house. Splitting them up by removing one would not be good for the series as far as Producers are concerned. What we the viewer wants doesn't come in to it! Whether the 'rules' are changed to suit Producers plans for the series is irrelevant to them. The one thing that really pee's me off is the fact they want it both ways!! They want to manipulate the show but still expect the viewer to vote!
Sadly there are people who vote & there will always be people who vote!! They don't care if people vote or not though because they can then switch to fully scripted! It baffles me though why people would throw money at them for this shit every series!!!!
Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“I didn't know that - I knew she was still in touch with her step daughters though.”
“I didn't know that - I knew she was still in touch with her step daughters though.”
It was in the media though so may be completely wrong
If they applied the same rules as the civilian show, then we'd have a mix of young and old to vote for. Seems they want to lose an older person quickly which would be bad for the house, as the young bullies will be allowed to dominate the house after this.
2 of 2
