Originally Posted by Dangermoose:
“Can't think for the life of me why this overgrown toddler's still single
”
“Can't think for the life of me why this overgrown toddler's still single
”
It's a real puzzler isn't it?
Men demanding special favours
2 of 3
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee:
“If a man--any man-- suggested I was their robot or a slave and demanded sex from me of any kind, I'd either knock him out or call the police. That shit is NOT ACCEPTABLE.”
“If a man--any man-- suggested I was their robot or a slave and demanded sex from me of any kind, I'd either knock him out or call the police. That shit is NOT ACCEPTABLE.”
Well if BB agree with you then presumably Heavy D will be removed.
If BB think it is acceptable and keep Heavy D in then you and similar minded people will have a decision to make wether you keep watching a programme that is so at odds with your way of thinking.
Hopefully all will be clarified later
Originally Posted by lotty27:
“Isn't offensive? He fancies her, she knows this and has quite nicely rebuffed him (can't say I blame her. she could have been a lot worse in her rebuffal).
Somehow she ends up the 'servant' to his 'master' (and no matter what spin they put it the task is basically masters and servants) and from his position of power he asks her for a blow job or similar? And that's not offensive? OK it's never going to happen and he'll know that as well she will but it's demeaning her and not exactly making her feel comfortable with him. But he'll no doubt laugh his head off and going 'BOOM!, just banter innit'. *roll eyes*
Sorry but I think I'd have been kicking him in his nuts and if I got chucked out so be it.”
“Isn't offensive? He fancies her, she knows this and has quite nicely rebuffed him (can't say I blame her. she could have been a lot worse in her rebuffal).
Somehow she ends up the 'servant' to his 'master' (and no matter what spin they put it the task is basically masters and servants) and from his position of power he asks her for a blow job or similar? And that's not offensive? OK it's never going to happen and he'll know that as well she will but it's demeaning her and not exactly making her feel comfortable with him. But he'll no doubt laugh his head off and going 'BOOM!, just banter innit'. *roll eyes*
Sorry but I think I'd have been kicking him in his nuts and if I got chucked out so be it.”
I agree, though not sure I'd wanna kick his nuts lol maybe get someone else to do that
It's bad enough when guys asks girls that they are supposedly dating that kinda qu.
Originally Posted by abbieunique:
“I agree, though not sure I'd wanna kick his nuts lol maybe get someone else to do that
It's bad enough when guys asks girls that they are supposedly dating that kinda qu.”
“I agree, though not sure I'd wanna kick his nuts lol maybe get someone else to do that
It's bad enough when guys asks girls that they are supposedly dating that kinda qu.”
True! You wouldn't want to go anywhere near his nuts even with your foot would you?
He's probably aware that she was/is a prostitute so felt entitled to ask.
No, I'm not saying that makes it OK so don't start
No, I'm not saying that makes it OK so don't start
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee:
“If a man--any man-- suggested I was their robot or a slave and demanded sex from me of any kind, I'd either knock him out or call the police. That shit is NOT ACCEPTABLE.”
“If a man--any man-- suggested I was their robot or a slave and demanded sex from me of any kind, I'd either knock him out or call the police. That shit is NOT ACCEPTABLE.”
Well said Etty! 100% agree with you!
Originally Posted by cavalli:
“He's probably aware that she was/is a prostitute so felt entitled to ask.
No, I'm not saying that makes it OK so don't start”
“He's probably aware that she was/is a prostitute so felt entitled to ask.
No, I'm not saying that makes it OK so don't start
”
Was she? I had no idea.
I presuming she's moved away from that now and is trying to move on with her life? Nice way to demean her and tear her back down then eh? What a nasty b@stard he is.
Besides (in theory) a prostitute still has the choice and can refuse to service someone and there wouldn't be enough money in the world to make he shag HIM. Not because of his weight so much but because he's a bloody a-hole!
I missed part of tonight's highlights, so I don't know if the incident was discussed. I did see Boom wigging out over his bed. If he did tell her he wanted her to perform some kind of sex act, IMO he got off lightly. Did they make any reference to what he actually said to Chloe? I'm pretty sure something about it was on last nights LF.
Bear and HD are pigs. Do these blokes not realise how they are making themselves look on national tv?
I'm beyond disgusted.
Aubrey shouldn't have spit in Bear's tea, or anyone's tea, but making people perform as sub humans willing to do anything asked of them is provocation enough. I'm not surprised people snapped.
Bear and HD are pigs. Do these blokes not realise how they are making themselves look on national tv?
I'm beyond disgusted.
Aubrey shouldn't have spit in Bear's tea, or anyone's tea, but making people perform as sub humans willing to do anything asked of them is provocation enough. I'm not surprised people snapped.
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee:
“Can it be true that as part of a task, HD asked a female HM for a hand/blowjob?
Is that not grounds for immediate removal from the house? WTF? I'm appalled!”
“Can it be true that as part of a task, HD asked a female HM for a hand/blowjob?
Is that not grounds for immediate removal from the house? WTF? I'm appalled!”
Dehumanising half the house, making them slaves, having thick housemates then degrading them. And that's just the stuff they decded to show. The more humiliating sexual stuff was edited out. What did Big Brother expect?
In the old days Channel 4 had resident psychologists who would have predicted a slave revolt of this kind and scrapped the idea. Channel 5 got rid of the psychological advice years ago. If I had been degraded and humiliated in such a way I would have done far worse than spit in some cretin's food.
He seemed to take the task the wrong way, he's dim. The washing someone else's clothing has been done before on BB though.
Originally Posted by cavalli:
“He's probably aware that she was/is a prostitute so felt entitled to ask.
No, I'm not saying that makes it OK so don't start”
“He's probably aware that she was/is a prostitute so felt entitled to ask.
No, I'm not saying that makes it OK so don't start
”
Her profession is totally irrelevant
Originally Posted by starry:
“He seemed to take the task the wrong way, he's dim. The washing someone else's clothing has been done before on BB though.”
“He seemed to take the task the wrong way, he's dim. The washing someone else's clothing has been done before on BB though.”
On previous series I have seen it but it was usually a top or two and was light-hearted. He made a point of insisting it was his underwear, not just one item, ALL his underwear, soiled and all. He stated he wanted to watch her doing it as well. no wonder the slaves rebelled.
BB chose not to show Boom making his disgusting request or the colour of the water when Saira was having to hand wash his soiled pants. Why isn't he getting a warning for treating Chloe like that. Also, why wasn't Bear spoken to about not letting Lewis go to the loo for over an hour when he was desperate.
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Her profession is totally irrelevant”
“Her profession is totally irrelevant”
Didn't bother to read the second line?
Originally Posted by cavalli:
“He's probably aware that she was/is a prostitute so felt entitled to ask.
No, I'm not saying that makes it OK so don't start”
“He's probably aware that she was/is a prostitute so felt entitled to ask.
No, I'm not saying that makes it OK so don't start
”
Your second line says it's not OK but your first line appears to be an excuse for Heavy D thinking he was entitled due to Chloe being a sex worker. Either you think her profession explains his behaviour around her or you don't. Seeing as you mentioned her profession, it comes across like that's a reason for him carrying on the way he does with her.
Ch5. Hmmmm nothing surprises me anymore. They would rather keep in HMs no matter what the HMs do simply because by removing would lessen viewers, and ch5 are scraping the barrel as it is.
Originally Posted by lotty27:
“Isn't offensive? He fancies her, she knows this and has quite nicely rebuffed him (can't say I blame her. she could have been a lot worse in her rebuffal).
Somehow she ends up the 'servant' to his 'master' (and no matter what spin they put it the task is basically masters and servants) and from his position of power he asks her for a blow job or similar? And that's not offensive? OK it's never going to happen and he'll know that as much she will, but it's demeaning her and not exactly making her feel comfortable with him. But he'll no doubt laugh his head off and going 'BOOM!, just banter innit'. *roll eyes*
Sorry but I think I'd have been kicking him in his nuts and if I got chucked out so be it.”
“Isn't offensive? He fancies her, she knows this and has quite nicely rebuffed him (can't say I blame her. she could have been a lot worse in her rebuffal).
Somehow she ends up the 'servant' to his 'master' (and no matter what spin they put it the task is basically masters and servants) and from his position of power he asks her for a blow job or similar? And that's not offensive? OK it's never going to happen and he'll know that as much she will, but it's demeaning her and not exactly making her feel comfortable with him. But he'll no doubt laugh his head off and going 'BOOM!, just banter innit'. *roll eyes*
Sorry but I think I'd have been kicking him in his nuts and if I got chucked out so be it.”
I haven't watched it , it's recorded....did he demand it then???
Maybe I have worked with too many men for far too long but if it was a task of master and servants and it was an off the cuff remark made in jest I wouldn't be offended I would laugh it off. As I have said I haven't watched it so if he demanded it then he should be removed for unacceptable behaviour.
Originally Posted by JVB69:
“I haven't watched it , it's recorded....did he demand it then???
Maybe I have worked with too many men for far too long but if it was a task of master and servants and it was an off the cuff remark made in jest I wouldn't be offended I would laugh it off. As I have said I haven't watched it so if he demanded it then he should be removed for unacceptable behaviour.”
“I haven't watched it , it's recorded....did he demand it then???
Maybe I have worked with too many men for far too long but if it was a task of master and servants and it was an off the cuff remark made in jest I wouldn't be offended I would laugh it off. As I have said I haven't watched it so if he demanded it then he should be removed for unacceptable behaviour.”
Yes he did.
REPULSIVE individual.
Cannot stand the men in the house this year.
BB: "Let's just sweep this one under the carpet. If it didn't happen on the highlights show then it didn't happen. Right?"
Originally Posted by ahoyy:
“Dehumanising half the house, making them slaves, having thick housemates then degrading them. And that's just the stuff they decded to show. The more humiliating sexual stuff was edited out. What did Big Brother expect?
In the old days Channel 4 had resident psychologists who would have predicted a slave revolt of this kind and scrapped the idea. Channel 5 got rid of the psychological advice years ago. If I had been degraded and humiliated in such a way I would have done far worse than spit in some cretin's food.”
“Dehumanising half the house, making them slaves, having thick housemates then degrading them. And that's just the stuff they decded to show. The more humiliating sexual stuff was edited out. What did Big Brother expect?
In the old days Channel 4 had resident psychologists who would have predicted a slave revolt of this kind and scrapped the idea. Channel 5 got rid of the psychological advice years ago. If I had been degraded and humiliated in such a way I would have done far worse than spit in some cretin's food.”
Psychologist on Channel 4 left the series mid way through IIRC in BB5 because he warned the producers that 'fight night' would happen if they meddled in things the way they did but they didn't listen to him in favour of ratings and pressed on with it. That night had three housemates forcefully stripping clothes from each other until topless and of course the infamous fights(s). But they all did get formal warnings and Nadia Emma and Marco were friends and laughing with each other when yanking each others underwear off lol.
But I don't know, I mean C4 did air some risky stuff that people may have forgotten but I feel they were more consistent in resolving it. And Channel 5 just seems so sleazy in comparison and actively trying to hide things from viewers like Jay shitting in the freezer and not being removed from the house for it because he was one of the main characters.
Originally Posted by JVB69:
“I haven't watched it , it's recorded....did he demand it then???
Maybe I have worked with too many men for far too long but if it was a task of master and servants and it was an off the cuff remark made in jest I wouldn't be offended I would laugh it off. As I have said I haven't watched it so if he demanded it then he should be removed for unacceptable behaviour.”
“I haven't watched it , it's recorded....did he demand it then???
Maybe I have worked with too many men for far too long but if it was a task of master and servants and it was an off the cuff remark made in jest I wouldn't be offended I would laugh it off. As I have said I haven't watched it so if he demanded it then he should be removed for unacceptable behaviour.”
I have no idea what this is about as I've seen nothing about it, but knowing this forum over the years, I'm sure we can both guess which is the most likely. Some posters should be working for the daily star.
Originally Posted by chameleon212:
“Yes he did.
REPULSIVE individual.
Cannot stand the men in the house this year.”
“Yes he did.
REPULSIVE individual.
Cannot stand the men in the house this year.”
Well, that convinces me he didn't.
Originally Posted by acid rain:
“It could be looked on as sexual harassment.
Surprised if he doesn't get a warning for it, but I think the producers don't want to interfere much this series.”
“It could be looked on as sexual harassment.
Surprised if he doesn't get a warning for it, but I think the producers don't want to interfere much this series.”
The Producers must have the same mentality as some of the housemates.
Originally Posted by JackieDVD:
“Well, that convinces me he didn't.”
“Well, that convinces me he didn't.”
Let's hope you never have to serve on a jury.
2 of 3
