• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Lewis needed a wee
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Robinson1
03-08-2016
Is that Bear article some sort of sick psycho?
Miss Con Strue
03-08-2016
Can you imagine Bear doing the electric shock experiment? If he was in control, he would turn the dial to fatal level in the blink of an eye. He makes me shudder, as does Boom.
CLL Dodge
03-08-2016
If Chloe needed one I wouldn't want to be in Heavy D's shoes.
SneakyBoo
03-08-2016
Surely they shouldn't fail a task if they have to pee.
stopping someone from using the toilet can cause damage to them can't it?

On another note, I don't like that that they are expected to touch them if requested to pass the task. It's not a problem if you don't have an issue touching the person yourself but if someone asked me to massage Heavy D and wash his dirty pants after what he said about her I would be offended.
al_capo
03-08-2016
The show is edit so maybe Bear let Lewis go not long after that clip and then he told him to go back?
jp761
03-08-2016
He's mystic meg in disguise!! I'm sure of it..
BabelBrook
03-08-2016
Originally Posted by SneakyBoo:
“Surely they shouldn't fail a task if they have to pee.
stopping someone from using the toilet can cause damage to them can't it?

On another note, I don't like that that they are expected to touch them if requested to pass the task. It's not a problem if you don't have an issue touching the person yourself but if someone asked me to massage Heavy D and wash his dirty pants after what he said about her I would be offended.”

It was crass of BB to pair Chloe with Colin in the first place.
TeekyPie
04-08-2016
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“If Chloe needed one I wouldn't want to be in Heavy D's shoes.”

I suspect in his shoes is exactly where the pee would end up
Cheetah666
04-08-2016
That was as bad as Aubrey spitting in food yet nothing was said about it.
gcmac
04-08-2016
I'm not a fan of Lewis, but from what was shown he appeared to be a very good sport in that task.
KT_Dog
04-08-2016
Originally Posted by Cheetah666:
“That was as bad as Aubrey spitting in food yet nothing was said about it.”

Not really. The guy was quite capable of going to the toilet if he wanted to.
Cheetah666
04-08-2016
Originally Posted by KT_Dog:
“Not really. The guy was quite capable of going to the toilet if he wanted to.”

They shouldn't be allowed to prevent each other going to the toilet as part of a task.
lon_chaney
04-08-2016
The commentary said Lewis has been sitting facing the wall for 89minutes the implication being that he had been bottling it up for that length of time - i find that hard to believe. I m4ean what about the human rights act and all that jazz.
KT_Dog
04-08-2016
Originally Posted by Cheetah666:
“They shouldn't be allowed to prevent each other going to the toilet as part of a task.”

Cheetah they're grown adults and none of them were handcuffed to a radiator.
lea27
04-08-2016
Originally Posted by al_capo:
“The show is edit so maybe Bear let Lewis go not long after that clip and then he told him to go back?”

I agree with this, he might have actually let him go at some point.
Cheetah666
04-08-2016
Originally Posted by KT_Dog:
“Cheetah they're grown adults and none of them were handcuffed to a radiator.”

No but they were told they would fail the task. BB shouldn't allow that as part of a task, it wouldn't be allowed in any normal work place and I assume legally BB has the same duty of care as an employer.
icefall
04-08-2016
They said on bots that he made Lewis sit there for 127 mins I think.
minkski
04-08-2016
maybe someone passed him a pee bottle while he was sat there, I'd have probably peed myself there on the chair
kitkat1971
04-08-2016
Originally Posted by KT_Dog:
“Not really. The guy was quite capable of going to the toilet if he wanted to.”

Not without chalking up a fail for his team in the task he couldn't. Unless you're suggesting he just pissed up against the lounge wall.

Bear took it too far by not allowing him to go to the loo at the start when Lewis told him he needed to go and then making him sit for at least 87 minutes. We know he didn't let him go before making him sit as Lewis kept saying he needed to go and Bear just replied that he should have gone earlier.

Not going to the loo when you need to is at best very uncomfortable and can actually lead to infections requiring antibiotics and we all know the more you take antibiotics the less effective they become which can, over years, prove terminal. That happened to my Mother - she had underlying UTI's for years which became resistant to antibiotics, the infections spread to her heart, lungs and blood (Sepcis) and antibiotics were useless and she died.

Whilst I'm saying it is unlikely that Lewis does have a UTI and Bear probably doesn't know all this stuff, I'm afraid that due to my family history, i don't find somebody being denied access to the loo when they need it, which could trigger an infection, remotely funny or acceptable as a means of trying to win the task.
kitkat1971
04-08-2016
Originally Posted by Cheetah666:
“No but they were told they would fail the task. BB shouldn't allow that as part of a task, it wouldn't be allowed in any normal work place and I assume legally BB has the same duty of care as an employer.”

Exactly.

I don't think it would even be allowed in Prison - it's one of the reasons that they have toilets, or at the very least a bucket, in all cells should there be a lockdown.

127 minutes is disgusting and BB shouldn't have allowed it.

Not condoning spitgate but if it happened whilst they knew that Lewis was being made to sit there whilst needing the loo i can understand why Aubrey and the people that saw her do it and said nothing felt that Bear deserved it.
Cheetah666
04-08-2016
I agree. It shows Bear's true colours to be really ugly too, he and Heavy D both took that task way too far.

Reminds me of the Milgram Experiment.
kitkat1971
04-08-2016
Originally Posted by lea27:
“I agree with this, he might have actually let him go at some point.”

Then they should have said so as they made such a big point about Lewis needing the loo, bear not letting him go before he made him sit down and that he'd been sitting there to an hour and a half. They were making Bear look to be a much worse person than he is if they only showed him refusing the toilet break and not that he let him go at some stage during the 87 minutes.

I don't like much of anything Bear has done to be honest but it appearing that he did that to somebody, denied them access to the loo would be enough to make me vote to evict him every time he is up.
Helen90
04-08-2016
Nothing Bear says or does surprises me anymore. He's awful, along with majority of the house.
Pitman
04-08-2016
It all worked out fine, because later Lewis pissed in Bear's Ribena
KT_Dog
04-08-2016
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“
Not going to the loo when you need to is at best very uncomfortable and can actually lead to infections requiring antibiotics and we all know the more you take antibiotics the less effective they become which can, over years, prove terminal. That happened to my Mother - she had underlying UTI's for years which became resistant to antibiotics, the infections spread to her heart, lungs and blood (Sepcis) and antibiotics were useless and she died..”

This is very scary to me. I've not only suffered reccuring UTI's for over five years (usually three times a year for a period of 2 weeks) but I've never once been to the doctors over it. In fact I'm a week into the latest one as I type. Every now and again it does play on my mind that I should be doing something about it, but I keep riding it out.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map