• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Big Brother completely overreacted over the spitting incident.
chameleon212
03-08-2016
Why is it Bear and Heavy D get away with AGGRESSIVE and demeaning behaviour towards women yet when their victims fight back THEY are the ones receiving the warnings?

The producers need to get their priorities straight.

No doubt Chloe will receive some kind of spurious "health and safety" warning from the producers too.
Henrik
03-08-2016
The 'victim' is a lowlife.
Salv*
03-08-2016
IMO spitting is one of the worst things..if I had to choose of getting punched or spat at (or spit In my food) I'd take being punched easily.

Yes what the boys have done deserve a warning.

But personally Aubrey deserved an ejection.
chameleon212
03-08-2016
Originally Posted by Henrik:
“The 'victim' is a lowlife.”

Nope, it was just "banter" to use Bear's vernacular.
Jim_Bob5
03-08-2016
Really? If Bear had spat in Aubrey's drink he would have likely been asked to leave. No way he would have got off with a warning.
lulu g
03-08-2016
They underreacted, or they didn't react quickly enough to prevent him consuming someone else's spittle. He's a nasty piece of work, no doubt about it, but there can be no denying that both Aubrey and Big Brother were very much in the wrong in this instance.
snickypoo
03-08-2016
Aubrey is disgusting for doing that! Its people like her, who think that it's a 'prank' to spit in someones food, that put me off eating out! Yeah, really funny prank! I can't abide Bear, but, I think he took it pretty well, most people would have gone loco! I know I would! Dirty sod!
ahoyy
03-08-2016
The whole thing could have easily been avoided. First you don't dehumanise half the house by seperating them into human and non human.
Second if you insist on dehumanising them then have the first rule of the task stating that NO DEGRADING SUGGESTIONS will be allowed, i.e. no washing of soiled underwear, and no continuous requests one after the other for hours at a time (as Bear was doing).
chameleon212
03-08-2016
Originally Posted by snickypoo:
“Aubrey is disgusting for doing that! Its people like her, who think that it's a 'prank' to spit in someones food, that put me off eating out! Yeah, really funny prank! I can't abide Bear, but, I think he took it pretty well, most people would have gone loco! I know I would! Dirty sod!”

Took it well?!

Didn't you see him and Heavy D making a HUGE fuss over it towards the end? After all the stuff they've done a bit of food and drink based humour is the LEAST they deserve.
Luxray
03-08-2016
Originally Posted by chameleon212:
“Took it well?!

Didn't you see him and Heavy D making a HUGE fuss over it towards the end? After all the stuff they've done a bit of food and drink based humour is the LEAST they deserve.”

I really don't view spitting in someone's food as "food based humour". It's disgusting and low.

Who the victim is is irrelevant (I can''t stand Bear).
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map