whats the point in the 2 old women on bit on the side?. they talk rubbish so pontless
whats the point in the 2 old women on bit on the side?
1 of 2
Originally Posted by Jackie Brown:
“Are we talking Dr Pam Spurr and Judi James? Or the other two?”
“Are we talking Dr Pam Spurr and Judi James? Or the other two?”
no i like them
Originally Posted by Ryeboy123:
“whats the point in the 2 old women on bit on the side?. they talk rubbish so pontless”
“whats the point in the 2 old women on bit on the side?. they talk rubbish so pontless”
No point at all, they're not amusing, on point or entertaining. Do you think they get paid for being on the show? More like they pay BB perhaps ..
Originally Posted by Jackie Brown:
“Are we talking Dr Pam Spurr and Judi James? Or the other two?”
“Are we talking Dr Pam Spurr and Judi James? Or the other two?”
Other two.
Agreed about how pointless it is. I mean, talk about filler segments!
BB has a lot of older viewers.
My Mum is 89 and has watched every BB and CBB (although she is finding the current one hard to watch)
It's nice to hear the views from older viewers IMO
My Mum is 89 and has watched every BB and CBB (although she is finding the current one hard to watch)
It's nice to hear the views from older viewers IMO
Instead of stupid filler segments and the same old audience members talking the same old crap, have callers! Allow people to ring into the show and then have the host talk to them and ask for their opinions on various housemates.
BOTS needs to raise the game a bit. Scrap Rylan and get Chris Wright to do it instead, have callers, scrap the audience or at least make them a silent audience, and revamp the panel to be a more intelligent, measured, balanced and articulate cast.
Tonight Anne Diamond and Hughie Maughan were a cut above the other two panellists. If BOTS can't find 4 decent panelists, then just have two good ones and talk to them more.
Pointless arguments and ridiculous character assassinations achieve nothing. Better to have reasoned and relevant debate between callers, Chris and the panel.
Have occasional guests as well, such as the psychologists and people relevant to the programme, and add more exclusives. Cut the running time to 60 minutes.
Job done, that's already a better show.
BOTS needs to raise the game a bit. Scrap Rylan and get Chris Wright to do it instead, have callers, scrap the audience or at least make them a silent audience, and revamp the panel to be a more intelligent, measured, balanced and articulate cast.
Tonight Anne Diamond and Hughie Maughan were a cut above the other two panellists. If BOTS can't find 4 decent panelists, then just have two good ones and talk to them more.
Pointless arguments and ridiculous character assassinations achieve nothing. Better to have reasoned and relevant debate between callers, Chris and the panel.
Have occasional guests as well, such as the psychologists and people relevant to the programme, and add more exclusives. Cut the running time to 60 minutes.
Job done, that's already a better show.
Originally Posted by Chief_Wiggum:
“Instead of stupid filler segments and the same old audience members talking the same old crap, have callers! Allow people to ring into the show and then have the host talk to them and ask for their opinions on various housemates.
BOTS needs to raise the game a bit. Scrap Rylan and get Chris Wright to do it instead, have callers, scrap the audience or at least make them a silent audience, and revamp the panel to be a more intelligent, measured, balanced and articulate cast.
Tonight Anne Diamond and Hughie Maughan were a cut above the other two panellists. If BOTS can't find 4 decent panelists, then just have two good ones and talk to them more.
Pointless arguments and ridiculous character assassinations achieve nothing. Better to have reasoned and relevant debate between callers, Chris and the panel.
Have occasional guests as well, such as the psychologists and people relevant to the programme, and add more exclusives. Cut the running time to 60 minutes.
Job done, that's already a better show.”
“Instead of stupid filler segments and the same old audience members talking the same old crap, have callers! Allow people to ring into the show and then have the host talk to them and ask for their opinions on various housemates.
BOTS needs to raise the game a bit. Scrap Rylan and get Chris Wright to do it instead, have callers, scrap the audience or at least make them a silent audience, and revamp the panel to be a more intelligent, measured, balanced and articulate cast.
Tonight Anne Diamond and Hughie Maughan were a cut above the other two panellists. If BOTS can't find 4 decent panelists, then just have two good ones and talk to them more.
Pointless arguments and ridiculous character assassinations achieve nothing. Better to have reasoned and relevant debate between callers, Chris and the panel.
Have occasional guests as well, such as the psychologists and people relevant to the programme, and add more exclusives. Cut the running time to 60 minutes.
Job done, that's already a better show.”
This. I really miss the BBLB days when it was really focused on the show and fed us tid bits that we don't see on the main show and deeper discussions about the episodes not focused on the panelists and daft crap like "question of the day" ect...
Originally Posted by Jackie Brown:
“Are we talking Dr Pam Spurr and Judi James? Or the other two?”
“Are we talking Dr Pam Spurr and Judi James? Or the other two?”
DAME Judi James, Jackie!
Originally Posted by Kopite1763:
“BB has a lot of older viewers.
My Mum is 89 and has watched every BB and CBB (although she is finding the current one hard to watch)
It's nice to hear the views from older viewers IMO”
“BB has a lot of older viewers.
My Mum is 89 and has watched every BB and CBB (although she is finding the current one hard to watch)
It's nice to hear the views from older viewers IMO
”
This would be OK if it appeared that those interviewed had watched the show.
They certainly didn't seem to understand the questions put to them last night. They looked bewildered half the time and as BabelBrook said, hadn't watched the show.
Originally Posted by merlinsmum:
“I'm in my sixties, but I fast forward through their segment, it's a complete waste of time.”
“I'm in my sixties, but I fast forward through their segment, it's a complete waste of time.”
I hope you aren't suggesting that you are old (because that would mean that I am too)
😉 😉 😉 😉
I love BBBOTS since Rylan took over but apart from that man who comes on to show us how the contestants are dancing these 2 women are such a waste of time. I cringe with embarrassment when they come on
I don't know if she is still on as I haven't watched BBOTS during CBB, but I didn't like the segment with the vicar. It was boring.
I thought they were OK the first couple of times just something a bit different. But to have them on every week is pointless . and the larger lady especially talks absolute nonsense
I fast forward them, the lady vicar and the dancing man.
At least they haven't had the person back who analyses asparagus thrown on the floor.
I remember when Russell Brand did the show he fooled about the whole time.
I like Rylan and agree Hughie and Anne were great guests.
At least they haven't had the person back who analyses asparagus thrown on the floor.
I remember when Russell Brand did the show he fooled about the whole time.
I like Rylan and agree Hughie and Anne were great guests.
Rylan seems to think the more cockney his guests are, the more hilarious and endearing they are to the entire nation. Can't blame the old biddies tho, being cheered on by the pathetic rylan and his audience, they have no idea how utterly awful their little piece is.
Originally Posted by merlinsmum:
“I'm in my sixties, but I fast forward through their segment, it's a complete waste of time.”
“I'm in my sixties, but I fast forward through their segment, it's a complete waste of time.”
Me too. The show's too long anyway, so it's nice to shorten it.
I get the impression that they are meant to 'represent' the older viewing public. BB has always been a show that is watched by people of all ages and they are trying to have an amusing segment to reflect the older generation.
I think they're fine.
I think they're fine.
1 of 2
