.They have completely brushed over his aggression and not a single panel or audience member got to give a view on it. Instead they did the comedy bit where he was scared.

Rylan just brushed it off at the start of the show said we would be discussing it lather in the show.

Even there just cut White D off.

Same earlier in the week, completely shutting down anything bad about Lewis, Marine and Bear.

the same way they avoided biggins biphobia comments

Big Brothers Bit On The Sham

To be fair they were nothing major, people here got the wrong end of the stick.

No mention of the fact that it wasn't the first time BB had had to tell him off in the DR

more excuses and excuses how typical.

All part of the fraud that channel 5 are committing. They can't upset the clients of certain agents that they collude with in defrauding the voting public in a rigged show.

The show never discusses controversial moments

Sounded like Hughie was told not to talk about spitting gate the other night

But they said that on the main show itself!

That really annoyed me, but alas he is a friend of the show!

BBBots pretend to be fair and impartial, but hell are they, and Ryan is as transparent as the audience members when it comes to who he likes or not (but granted, it can be hard for presenters to pretend to be impartial all of the time).

They always discussed controversial moments. Even so far as devoting half a show to interviewing the girlfriend of some rapey bloke who got violent to some Irish girl and strangled and slapped her.

Nice of them to mention it on the main show, pity they didn't think it important enough to let us see Bear being spoken to about his recent behaviour.

I'm having trouble watching BOTS, have to keep pressing the skip button when that bloody awful Dee woman speaks.

Both shows are a serious crime waiting to happen.

Are you joking ? they talked about him for the majority of the episode !

Wish Iain Lee was back on the panel, bet he wouldn't have avoided talking about it. But of course that is why he is no longer there.

They said they had spoken to him the night before about his behaviour -not defending Bear but that would be both times after he had been informed what Audrey did to his food.
BB will be scared that if they discuss bear they might realise the 2 incidents are related because BB could have stopped it by calling Audrey to the DR immediately instead of allowing the situation to continue they are more responsibly and could be sued

I will only say one thing Bear should have been removed

They said that they had spoken to Bear on several occasions about his behaviour over the course of the last few new nights.

If anyone tried to sue BB their defence would be they acted upon the 'incident' as soon as it came to their attention, it would be very difficult for anyone to prove otherwise. How does anyone know that they allowed the situation to continue?