They are the same age

I bet lots of people could think of another name for her - and Bear.

I bet with those sausage lips it was like kissing a suction pad.

Sadly few years ago just "falling in love" with someone in the house was enough to make a decent amount off. Now unless you have rampant wild sex (even 45 seconds worth) its enough to get various TV shows/websites/magazines obsessed about you.

Did anyone actually tell him his finger was down the plughole ?

I'm dying!

Grooming? She's not a child, she's an adult woman who works in the sex industry, and incidentally is rumoured to have made a fortune doing it. How exactly is she being led astray? Bear's done nothing other men looking for an easy lay would do. I'm not a fan of Bear, I think he's foul, selfish and I wish he would disappear from my screen, but to paint him as the reason Chloe's getting bad press is ludicrous.

Happy to cheer someone up

I can't speak for anyone else, just as you can't speak for me, but I used the word 'prostitute' not as an insult but as a factual description of how Chloe earns, or has earned, a living. I mentioned this because I felt it had relevance to the original point, in that she must be used to being 'intimate' with people she doesn't fancy.

Bear has, quite rightly, had plenty of criticism.

Unlike her previous 'boyfriend' Mr Gray 58+ (founder & CEO of Spearmint Rhino) who I believe paid for her body modifications while she shared his 'luxury lifestyle.' I don't think Bear can afford her.

I have no idea if others in there have children in their lives, nephews, nieces, godchildren etc. Why single Chloe's behaviour out? To me, she's a moron but so are others in there.

I don't think it's abuse to criticize her for saying one thing and then doing something which is contrary to what she just said.

Thank you - this was exactly the point I intended to make. What she did or didn't do in the past is neither here nor there - it is not relevant to anything going on between her and Bear in the house. It smacks of that horrible attitude that a prostitute doesn't get to choose who she interacts with sexually and people can do what they like with her. Horrible.

It is.

Feel free to stop reading at any time....

That's your opinion and you are entitled to it, as I am with mine.

I didn't single her out. I commented on Chloe because this thread is about Chloe.

Well, that one doesn't work. Anyone's entitled to choose partners for sex, as long as they are both consenting adults, so that blows the grooming bullshit out of the water.
Chloe on BB has repeated ad nauseam that Bear is "not her type" and she doesn't like or fancy him, yet in the past week we have seen her climbing all over him, at the same time driveling on how she doesn't know why she needs to jump on him every time he walks past. This nonsense gets old fast. Instead of bemoaning how confused she is, and doing the opposite of the crap that comes out her mouth, she should just get on with it and spare us her inner turmoil. It's boring, and she is a tiresome imbecile. I neither need nor want to know what garbage is going on inside her addled head.

Independent Escorts DO pick and choose who they go with, as the client is screened, and has to provide evidence as to who he is, AND in some cases references for other Escorts, AND if she isn't one, the agency also screens the client, if the client has been a complete a***hole, he is blacklisted.

As for Chloe, has it occurred to you that she is only going with Bear for air time?

BIB1 - Except in the context of this thread, which is about how a woman could be intimate with someone she doesn't fancy.

BIB2 - Sadly, this is true, except possibly for an elite few. Nobody (or virtually nobody) thinks that's a good thing.

Yeah, she's not sharp and I was not so much agreeing with the 'grooming' thing (although Bear was using her to get back at Heavy) as saying that people going on about prostitution just because she's snogging Bear. It's not relevant and in certain cases on this thread it is being done with a mysogynistic undertone.