DS Forums

 
 

So the Transcript is Fake - So what was the reason ?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2016, 10:00
treetree
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,624

that Biggins was evicted ?
treetree is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 06-08-2016, 10:04
Dangermouse2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Posts: 52
It's more gripping than who shot JR.
Dangermouse2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:04
GibsonSG
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 14,772
that Biggins was evicted ?
So where did the transcript come from, and where is Hercule Poirot when you need him?
GibsonSG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:18
karl_kennedy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 639
It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.




Maggie
karl_kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:25
Rhumbatugger
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80,211
That SPOOF was a fake then?

Well I never.
Rhumbatugger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:37
Hootie19
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 2,963
The transcript might have been a fake, but I wonder if that was actually the reason that Biggins was removed. Was any of the alleged conversation shown on LF? Or do we really only know officially what Emma said on the Eviction Show last night?

From the bit of footage shown last night, it looked as thought the HMs didn't know that he had been removed permanently, as someone was saying they hoped he was in the other house, or other room.
Hootie19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:38
jeanoj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
That SPOOF was a fake then?

Well I never.
Big Brother UK ‏@bbuk · 46m46 minutes ago

We can confirm that a transcript claiming to relate to Christopher Biggins' removal from the #CBB house is 100% fake
jeanoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:39
An Thropologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,125
It's more gripping than who shot JR.
JR has been shot?
An Thropologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:42
Rhumbatugger
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80,211
In the diary room by Professor Plum.


Sorry my genres are colliding
Rhumbatugger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:42
KT_Dog
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,666
It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.




Maggie
YOU'RE Maggie?!
KT_Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:47
karl_kennedy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 639
YOU'RE Maggie?!
hooked.....
karl_kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:49
dannyboy22
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 956
It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.




Maggie
dannyboy22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:49
KT_Dog
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,666
Throw me back! Throw me back! I've still got so much more righteous indignation to give!
KT_Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:52
doormouse
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: I'm NOT doormouse1 !!
Posts: 1,916
It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.




Maggie

Class! :
doormouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:54
spkx
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
The thing is that the Daily Star reported the reason was the same as what the transcript suggested (Nazi comments to Katie) - and that was on their front page from before the transcript was posted.
spkx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:55
doormouse
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: I'm NOT doormouse1 !!
Posts: 1,916
The thing is that the Daily Star reported the reason was the same as what the transcript suggested (Nazi comments to Katie) - and that was on their front page from before the transcript was posted.
Cutting edge news - the Daily Star reports bullshine!
doormouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 11:02
spkx
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
Cutting edge news - the Daily Star reports bullshine!
But what are the chances of two sources making up the same thing?
spkx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 11:04
KT_Dog
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,666
But what are the chances of two sources making up the same thing?
You don't think perhaps squirrel read the star/mirror/sun story and based his faux transcript around it?
KT_Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 11:05
2la
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,860
I reckon they are trying to protect their beloved biggins. We will never see the truth anyway
2la is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 11:05
doormouse
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: I'm NOT doormouse1 !!
Posts: 1,916
But what are the chances of two sources making up the same thing?
'Journalists', faux journalists and wannabe journalists - amounts to the same thing in the end.
doormouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 11:12
spkx
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
You don't think perhaps squirrel read the star/mirror/sun story and based his faux transcript around it?
They posted it before the story was online, only the headline was revealed.

At 10PM the Daily Star had their headline about a Nazi joke, but nothing about Katie, etc.

At 11PM the transcript appeared

at Midnight, the Star story was released and matched up with the transcript about Katie being left in tears.
spkx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 11:16
Aura101
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,568
this more than likely looks like another 'Aaron/Joel, Nadia/Coolio' type situation where Biggins has done something offensive, perhaps not warranting a removal, however Katie has kicked up a fuss, therefore Biggins was removed.
we will see.
Aura101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 11:16
John Dough
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 98,182
In the diary room by Professor Plum.


Sorry my genres are colliding
OJ is INNOCENT!
John Dough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 11:17
Arcana
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 🖥⌨🖱
Posts: 29,243
Maybe it's a fake ejection.🙄
Arcana is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 11:19
KT_Dog
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,666
They posted it before the story was online, only the headline was revealed.

At 10PM the Daily Star had their headline about a Nazi joke, but nothing about Katie, etc.

At 11PM the transcript appeared

at Midnight, the Star story was released and matched up with the transcript about Katie being left in tears.
Well that's the Stars side of things covered! The Sun though posted the 'nazi joke left katie in tears' story before even the stars 10pm headline. Basing it apparently on twitter comments of that nature that began around 8pm.
KT_Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36.