that Biggins was evicted ?
So the Transcript is Fake - So what was the reason ?
1 of 4
Originally Posted by treetree:
“that Biggins was evicted ?”
“that Biggins was evicted ?”
So where did the transcript come from, and where is Hercule Poirot when you need him?
It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.
Maggie
Maggie
The transcript might have been a fake, but I wonder if that was actually the reason that Biggins was removed. Was any of the alleged conversation shown on LF? Or do we really only know officially what Emma said on the Eviction Show last night?
From the bit of footage shown last night, it looked as thought the HMs didn't know that he had been removed permanently, as someone was saying they hoped he was in the other house, or other room.
From the bit of footage shown last night, it looked as thought the HMs didn't know that he had been removed permanently, as someone was saying they hoped he was in the other house, or other room.
Originally Posted by Rhumbatugger:
“That SPOOF was a fake then?
Well I never.”
“That SPOOF was a fake then?
Well I never.”
Big Brother UK @bbuk · 46m46 minutes ago
We can confirm that a transcript claiming to relate to Christopher Biggins' removal from the #CBB house is 100% fake
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“JR has been shot?
”
“JR has been shot?
”
In the diary room by Professor Plum.
Sorry my genres are colliding
Originally Posted by karl_kennedy:
“It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.
Maggie”
“It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.
Maggie”
YOU'RE Maggie?!
Originally Posted by karl_kennedy:
“It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.
Maggie”
“It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.
Maggie”
Originally Posted by karl_kennedy:
“hooked.....”
“hooked.....
”
Throw me back! Throw me back! I've still got so much more righteous indignation to give!
Originally Posted by karl_kennedy:
“It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.
Maggie”
“It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.
Maggie”
Class!
:
The thing is that the Daily Star reported the reason was the same as what the transcript suggested (Nazi comments to Katie) - and that was on their front page from before the transcript was posted.
Originally Posted by spkx:
“The thing is that the Daily Star reported the reason was the same as what the transcript suggested (Nazi comments to Katie) - and that was on their front page from before the transcript was posted.”
“The thing is that the Daily Star reported the reason was the same as what the transcript suggested (Nazi comments to Katie) - and that was on their front page from before the transcript was posted.”
Cutting edge news - the Daily Star reports bullshine!
Originally Posted by doormouse:
“Cutting edge news - the Daily Star reports bullshine!”
“Cutting edge news - the Daily Star reports bullshine!”
But what are the chances of two sources making up the same thing?
Originally Posted by spkx:
“But what are the chances of two sources making up the same thing?”
“But what are the chances of two sources making up the same thing?”
You don't think perhaps squirrel read the star/mirror/sun story and based his faux transcript around it?
Originally Posted by spkx:
“But what are the chances of two sources making up the same thing?”
“But what are the chances of two sources making up the same thing?”
'Journalists', faux journalists and wannabe journalists - amounts to the same thing in the end.
Originally Posted by KT_Dog:
“You don't think perhaps squirrel read the star/mirror/sun story and based his faux transcript around it?”
“You don't think perhaps squirrel read the star/mirror/sun story and based his faux transcript around it?”
They posted it before the story was online, only the headline was revealed.
At 10PM the Daily Star had their headline about a Nazi joke, but nothing about Katie, etc.
At 11PM the transcript appeared
at Midnight, the Star story was released and matched up with the transcript about Katie being left in tears.
this more than likely looks like another 'Aaron/Joel, Nadia/Coolio' type situation where Biggins has done something offensive, perhaps not warranting a removal, however Katie has kicked up a fuss, therefore Biggins was removed.
we will see.
we will see.
Originally Posted by Rhumbatugger:
“In the diary room by Professor Plum.
Sorry my genres are colliding”
“In the diary room by Professor Plum.
Sorry my genres are colliding
”
OJ is INNOCENT!
Originally Posted by spkx:
“They posted it before the story was online, only the headline was revealed.
At 10PM the Daily Star had their headline about a Nazi joke, but nothing about Katie, etc.
At 11PM the transcript appeared
at Midnight, the Star story was released and matched up with the transcript about Katie being left in tears.”
“They posted it before the story was online, only the headline was revealed.
At 10PM the Daily Star had their headline about a Nazi joke, but nothing about Katie, etc.
At 11PM the transcript appeared
at Midnight, the Star story was released and matched up with the transcript about Katie being left in tears.”
Well that's the Stars side of things covered! The Sun though posted the 'nazi joke left katie in tears' story before even the stars 10pm headline. Basing it apparently on twitter comments of that nature that began around 8pm.
1 of 4
