• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
So the Transcript is Fake - So what was the reason ?
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
Rhumbatugger
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Terry N:
“There's so many transcripts on twitter it's hard to tell which one is real. There's one about Biggins in World War II, one about him being on the ISS space station and a few others. I don't think any are real.”

I don't know. I think the space station one sounds real.
ahoyy
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Rhumbatugger:
“I don't know. I think the space station one sounds real.”

Oh... ISS, for a minute there I thought it was ISIS. Phew, Biggins with a big beard isn't a good look.
Etty_Dee
06-08-2016
I read the transcript posted last night, and was shocked.
So, it was a fake? Why was Biggins removed, then? I find it very odd when Emma told us about Biggins getting the boot, but we would only learn why tonight. Legal reasons?
What is going on?
I get the impression we'll never find out what Biggins really said/did. It must have been something pretty outrageous.
Who is Secret Squirrel?
ahoyy
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee:
“I read the transcript posted last night, and was shocked.
So, it was a fake? Why was Biggins removed, then? I find it very odd when Emma told us about Biggins getting the boot, but we would only learn why tonight. Legal reasons?
What is going on?
I get the impression we'll never find out what Biggins really said/did. It must have been something pretty outrageous.
Who is Secret Squirrel?”

A fantasist that appeared years ago pretending to be an "insider". Which is why so many fell for it, as they have invested heavily in the fantasy and many were keen to vouch for this person's credibility. Ouch.
Etty_Dee
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by BBobit:
“Well that settles that then.

I'm sure A transcript was a 100% fake but what about the one that appeared here, and what does 100% fake even mean? Does it merely mean that it wasn't officially released by CBBUK even it was a fair reflection of what actually went down?

I've got a funny feeling that nobody is going to find out the truth on this one other than those who were there at the time.

One thing is known from CBB's own statements is that Biggins has spectacularly lost his gig and perhaps his fee for something and given the leniency shown to other housemates for rule breaks this season it must have been something pretty bad.”

^^^^^this.
Etty_Dee
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by ahoyy:
“A fantasist that appeared years ago pretending to be an "insider". Which is why so many fell for it, as they have invested heavily in the fantasy and many were keen to vouch for this person's credibility. Ouch.”

Aah. OK. Thanks.
Lots of FMs last night were adamant Secret Squirrel was not only bona fide, but never wrong.
ahoyy
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee:
“Aah. OK. Thanks.
Lots of FMs last night were adamant Secret Squirrel was not only bona fide, but never wrong.”

Hmmm. The squirrel went and lost all its nuts.
GibsonSG
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by ahoyy:
“Oh... ISS, for a minute there I thought it was ISIS. Phew, Biggins with a big beard isn't a good look.”

Biggins and ISIS wouldn't work for so many reasons.
GibsonSG
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee:
“Aah. OK. Thanks.
Lots of FMs last night were adamant Secret Squirrel was not only bona fide, but never wrong.”

I wasn't. At first I thought it was real until I saw other sites reporting on it.
Etty_Dee
06-08-2016
A question.
If Secret Squirrel is a known fantasist spammer, how is it that someone was able to log in under that name and post? From my experience of Internet message boards, spammers get banned, and after that their usernick is permanently blocked. Further, if they are known by admin as malicious spammers, they have to change their IP address as well. So, how come SS was able to breeze right in and post a fake, very damaging transcript?
It's all very odd.
allie4
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Virgil Tracy:
“I don't see how they're protecting him if they're saying he was removed .

.”

They're protecting his career (among other things) if they deny the transcript and at least some of the vile and stupid things he was purported to have said.
dirtyrat
06-08-2016
This is going to be another Roswell . The cover up is in full swing
ahoyy
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee:
“A question.
If Secret Squirrel is a known fantasist spammer, how is it that a poster was able to log in under that name and post? From my experience of Internet message boards, spammers get banned, and after that their usernick is permanently blocked. Further, if they are known by admin as malicious spammers, they have to change their IP address as well. So, how come SS was able to breeze right in and post a fake, very damaging transcript?
It's all very odd.”

Many friends here. Years and years of pretending to be an insider. A couple of early coincidences convinced enough people that he was legit, even when he was wrong, which was most of the time. But his fans would rally round and claim that he was right most of the time. He wasn't.
pattiflat
06-08-2016
Biggins can sell his story as to why he was booted out and be reimbursed with his £150,00
muggins14
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by karl_kennedy:
“It was so DS forum members could form a posse with flaming torches to hunt down 1970's TV stars......and then slink in like salted snails when they realised it had about as much veracity as your average Sun editorial............and you can quote me on that.




Maggie”

I must admit I had a go at one of the so-called Big Brother/TV information Twitter pages last night for using the post from DS and tweeting it to Biggins twitter page. I asked why on earth they were taking a bloody post from a forum and quoting it as gospel truth. They were convinced there was no way it could be fake.
ahoyy
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“I must admit I had a go at one of the so-called Big Brother/TV information Twitter pages last night for using the post from DS and tweeting it to Biggins twitter page. I asked why on earth they were taking a bloody post from a forum and quoting it as gospel truth. They were convinced there was no way it could be fake.”

Confirmation Bias
Wainy84
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by 2la:
“I reckon they are trying to protect their beloved biggins. We will never see the truth anyway”

I agree.
JackieDVD
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by BBobit:
“...given the leniency shown to other housemates for rule breaks this season it must have been something pretty bad.”

There's literally no words that could justify being removed from the house. Let them say what they want. Let people see what they say.
JackieDVD
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Davidsaid:
“His wiki page says its not for anything racial so i assume he got ejected for his comments earlier in the week and the uproar they have caused on social media.”

It can't be that. Ejected for having an opinion?
viva.espana
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by JackieDVD:
“There's literally no words that could justify being removed from the house. Let them say what they want. Let people see what they say.”

Well that's not true. Of course there are words/views that would be regarded by a thinking majority as absolutely beyond the pale, warranting instant removal.

But, back to Biggins, I can't imagine what he could have said that resulted in his removal in the light of what BB is prepared to overlook from other HMs.
scotch
06-08-2016
I've met good old Biggins a few times. His public persona is quite different to how he really is!

His best mate was that other lovely warm person - Cilla!

I have no doubt biggins legal team will be ensuring he comes out of this in the best light possible.
Bagshot85
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Purves Grundy:
“Due to all the recent pressure re Biggins-Gate, BB have just released the real transcript of the conversation that got him kicked out:

[The HMs are in the garden]

Biggins: You know, I remember watching when Big Brother used to have some actual integrity. There was no outside contact: at all; no real tolerance for rule-breaking; the Diary Room was sacrosanct; no private conversations were relayed to other housemates as a way to generate cheap, exploitative drama.

Bear: What really? You're on a wind-up, mate!

Biggins: No! And you used to have proper, interesting tasks that lasted all week too. None of this "Housemates, place yourself in the order that the public have ranked you in terms of attractiveness, being two-faced, being the biggest game-player" stuff. They were allowed to just get on an interact with each other normally, so any drama and confrontation would arise organically, and not be cynically imposed by Big Brother itself onto the house to generate tabloid-baiting story lines.

Katie [shocked]: I'm sorry, I can't handle this!

[Katie then runs into the house crying.]

Big Brother: Housemates, would Christopher come to the Diary Room, immediately!

Biggins: Oh oh! Looks like I'm in trouble.

[Biggins goes to Diary Room]

Big Brother: Christopher. On entering the Big Brother house you were made aware that offensive behaviour would not be tolerated.

Biggins: Yes, that's correct.

Big Brother: Christopher, Big Brother has studied what you've just said in the garden and believes that your comments could cause deep offence to reality TV producers, including those working for Big Brother itself. Therefore Big Brother has no other option than evicting you from the house with immediate effect. Please leave by the door to your left, and may God have mercy on your soul...”

CLL Dodge
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Purves Grundy:
“Due to all the recent pressure re Biggins-Gate, BB have just released the real transcript of the conversation that got him kicked out:

[The HMs are in the garden]

Biggins: You know, I remember watching when Big Brother used to have some actual integrity. There was no outside contact: at all; no real tolerance for rule-breaking; the Diary Room was sacrosanct; no private conversations were relayed to other housemates as a way to generate cheap, exploitative drama.

Bear: What really? You're on a wind-up, mate!

Biggins: No! And you used to have proper, interesting tasks that lasted all week too. None of this "Housemates, place yourself in the order that the public have ranked you in terms of attractiveness, being two-faced, being the biggest game-player" stuff. They were allowed to just get on an interact with each other normally, so any drama and confrontation would arise organically, and not be cynically imposed by Big Brother itself onto the house to generate tabloid-baiting story lines.

Katie [shocked]: I'm sorry, I can't handle this!

[Katie then runs into the house crying.]

Big Brother: Housemates, would Christopher come to the Diary Room, immediately!

Biggins: Oh oh! Looks like I'm in trouble.

[Biggins goes to Diary Room]

Big Brother: Christopher. On entering the Big Brother house you were made aware that offensive behaviour would not be tolerated.

Biggins: Yes, that's correct.

Big Brother: Christopher, Big Brother has studied what you've just said in the garden and believes that your comments could cause deep offence to reality TV producers, including those working for Big Brother itself. Therefore Big Brother has no other option than evicting you from the house with immediate effect. Please leave by the door to your left, and may God have mercy on your soul...”

That sounds very believable but BB can't screen it. They'll have to get a Biggins soundalike to overdub Nazi jokes on it.
MissDeeBlue
06-08-2016
I typed a post on a thread about biggins kicked transcript, my FB saying that the 'black small brain' story was made up, and was used as a deterrent from the truth. Which is secret.....
... my thoughts were deleted from this forum

#illuminati
ahoyy
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by allie4:
“They're protecting his career (among other things) if they deny the transcript and at least some of the vile and stupid things he was purported to have said.”

Seriously? Wow. Hahaha.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map