• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Big Brother has confirmed transcript of what Biggins
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
KT_Dog
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by revolver44:
“Ch5 aren't stupid.”

Source?
doormouse
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Jelakins:
“artistic license and fiction - the writer didn't say it was real...”

Just goes to show how easily the public can be manipulated. The Media do say stuff is real and I don't believe the majority is. But many people do. They don't need artistic licence, they have a very rich and powerful mogul owning them.
claremonts
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by doormouse:
“Oh yes, really important football coverage beforehand. ”

I'll just have to watch BBC2 as a time-filler and find out what really happened to Van Gogh's ear then while i'm waiting 🙂
biomorph04
06-08-2016
I love that the Sun report it as a hoax, but nonetheless print the entire thing Hopefully the mud will stick.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...ranscript/amp/
doormouse
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by claremonts:
“I'll just have to watch BBC2 as a time-filler and find out what really happened to Van Gogh's ear then while i'm waiting 🙂”

Yes, that could be another fairytale. I'm sure Hollywood and the Media were invented for a very good reason.

Originally Posted by biomorph04:
“I love that the Sun report it as a hoax, but nonetheless print the entire thing Hopefully the mud will stick.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...ranscript/amp/”

Manipulation at it's finest. It'll be interesting to see how what result will be and what they wanted it to be.
Heatherbell
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by GibsonSG:
“Then it is libelous, woops to whoever posted it!”

That's what I'm thinking . He/she (the poster) put some pretty nasty words into people's mouths .
revolver44
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by KT_Dog:
“Source?”

In this context I'd call them more inept than stupid.
doormouse
06-08-2016
Hmm, I think it's all been scripted from the get go. I'm not sure why yet, but I'm looking forward to watching it all pan out.
KT_Dog
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by biomorph04:
“I love that the Sun report it as a hoax, but nonetheless print the entire thing Hopefully the mud will stick.”

Say whaaaaat?!
chameleon212
06-08-2016
What transcript?
Makson
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Heatherbell:
“That's what I'm thinking . He/she (the poster) put some pretty nasty words into people's mouths .”

That poster deserves everything coming to them.
I hope DS mods have banned him/her at least.
Veri
06-08-2016
"Confirmed"? Where? Why is there no source given in the OP?
JackieDVD
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by roseblue1:
“has said is 100% fake.”

Looks like weird wording to me. The 100% is redundant. It's fake or it isn't.
JackieDVD
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Heatherbell:
“That's what I'm thinking . He/she (the poster) put some pretty nasty words into people's mouths .”

None of which justify an ejection. No-ones safety is at risk by those comments. Upset or not, I'm pretty sure the people in the house are capable of handling it themselves. Having it out in the open and having a debate amongst themselves may actually have achieved something.
Cheetah666
06-08-2016
It was very well done, I must admit I was fooled.

My cat knew better though. She's looking at me all complacent now, foowell that I am.
Lee_Bo
06-08-2016
Has anyone got a link to this transcript please? It'll take me ages to trawl through the threads.
Wainy84
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Lee_Bo:
“Has anyone got a link to this transcript please? It'll take me ages to trawl through the threads.”

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...ranscript/amp/
Lee_Bo
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Wainy84:
“https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...ranscript/amp/”

Much appreciated
digiqueen
06-08-2016
As I said at the time, the only part I believed was that Grant said 'err'. That was believable.
Cheetah666
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by digiqueen:
“As I said at the time, the only part I believed was that Grant said 'err'. That was believable.”

That's the bit that had me fooled.
honeythewitch
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by Heatherbell:
“That's what I'm thinking . He/she (the poster) put some pretty nasty words into people's mouths .”

It looked to me like people were doing that all by themselves.
KT_Dog
06-08-2016
Originally Posted by digiqueen:
“As I said at the time, the only part I believed was that Grant said 'err'. That was believable.”

James being called over to discuss climate change, before Sam called him away again was a masterstroke! So utterly pointless it could only have been true!
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map