She is one of those I know very little about so went to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebrity_Big_Brother_18
clicked on her name from list of contestants and it comes up:
Sorry, this page was recently deleted (within the last 24 hours). The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.
08:28, 6 August 2016 TomStar81 (talk | contribs) deleted page Chloe Khan (G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Khan)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloe_Khan
Bit odd.
Apparently previously deleted because:
Delete - Per WP:GNG and WP:ENT. Apart from a bunch of tabloids and celebrity gossip, there doesn't appear to be enough coverage to assert that this person has met the guidelines for WP:GNG, and it looks pretty clear that this person does not meet WP:ENT. I did find some sources talking about her modeling (NSFW Warning: suggestive photos - [1], [2], [3], and [4]), but she does not look to meet WP:PORNBIO (for those who consider her modeling to be pornography). I don't believe that WP:1E applies in this particular case, but I agree that notability is not sufficient given my research and findings. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
She is just not enough of a Zeleb.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebrity_Big_Brother_18
clicked on her name from list of contestants and it comes up:
Sorry, this page was recently deleted (within the last 24 hours). The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.
08:28, 6 August 2016 TomStar81 (talk | contribs) deleted page Chloe Khan (G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Khan)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloe_Khan
Bit odd.

Apparently previously deleted because:
Delete - Per WP:GNG and WP:ENT. Apart from a bunch of tabloids and celebrity gossip, there doesn't appear to be enough coverage to assert that this person has met the guidelines for WP:GNG, and it looks pretty clear that this person does not meet WP:ENT. I did find some sources talking about her modeling (NSFW Warning: suggestive photos - [1], [2], [3], and [4]), but she does not look to meet WP:PORNBIO (for those who consider her modeling to be pornography). I don't believe that WP:1E applies in this particular case, but I agree that notability is not sufficient given my research and findings. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
She is just not enough of a Zeleb.
