I think the transcript was genuine, and played down once Biggins legal team found a way to not publicise the worst of what he said. In other words a whitewash.
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee: “ I think the transcript was genuine, and played down once Biggins legal team found a way to not publicise the worst of what he said. In other words a whitewash.”
Despite it being denied ? if it came out that it was C5 would be in a lot of trouble. Just the way it was written showed it was fake. The transcript that appeared on twitter came from a poster on DS who then either posted it to twitter or someone else did and others then jumped on it , even the tabloids mention that , well not that it was on DS before twitter but they mention it being posted on a BB twitter feed then retweeted .
It was interesting that The Sun said the transcript was a hoax, before publishing practically all of it and analysing it as if it had all happened, including the other housemates' contributions. Why did they write a whole article about a fake document?
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee: “I think the transcript was genuine, and played down once Biggins legal team found a way to not publicise the worst of what he said. In other words a whitewash.”