|
||||||||
Biggins Is Not Getting His £150k Fee |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Broughty Ferry
Posts: 30,532
|
Biggins Is Not Getting His £150k Fee
According tomorrows papers BB are refusing to pay him his fee.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,370
|
Par for the course when a housemate gets himself ejected, surely. That's why the rules are so important, it ties to the money and is included in the contract. However, with Biggins being removed so unceremoniously and without much (from our vantage point) support, I thought BB would pay him anyway.
Really, if the producers are going to pull something like this, they should show the audience all the "offensive or unacceptable language" (that's what the damn disclaimer is for) as well as all the warnings. Not only because this show is meant not to be constructed reality but also to help cover the showrunners own asses when they kick a housemate out over f*ck all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,469
|
Part of the negotiated settlement with Biggins probably was - we'll keep quiet about the jew comment but you dont get your $150K.
No wonder nobody wants to do CBB and those that do either keep quiet while in the house or just want to get voted out asap. Least grant got his money. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 621
|
Good, he signed a contract, he knew the rules.....he broke the rules and his contract (according to big brother), so no pay.
Now he will go on the media circus apologising or complaining about "freedom of speech" and maybe getting a bit of money for that. He can go around with his own free will to talk about all manners of subjects in his local pub. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 931
|
To think if he'd kept his opinions to himself and instead gobbed in drinks and smashed mirrors he'd be sitting pretty still.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 997
|
Makes no difference to me what goes in his bank account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 731
|
Good. Hopefully we don't see him on SOTS anymore either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 25,455
|
Quote:
To think if he'd kept his opinions to himself and instead gobbed in drinks and smashed mirrors he'd be sitting pretty still.
Quite. Having an opinion and daring to state it is now against the rules. May as well go the whole hog now, and fill the house with brainless bimbos and moronic grunts who haven't evolved enough yet to even HAVE an opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Fence With Rachel Rice
Posts: 6,314
|
They probably didn't feel they were getting out of Biggins what they'd hoped for in paying him so much money and decided to get out of it by ejecting him over this so called offensive rule break. Slimy and underhanded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,014
|
If what we've seen is the extent of his remarks I hope he sues them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,057
|
Quote:
If what we've seen is the extent of his remarks I hope he sues them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
They probably didn't feel they were getting out of Biggins what they'd hoped for in paying him so much money and decided to get out of it by ejecting him over this so called offensive rule break. Slimy and underhanded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,072
|
He's overrated anyway. all he does is lays back, starts a sentence and does a stupid laugh half way through it . he has nothing to say of relevance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 621
|
Quote:
I was thinking on similar lines. Biggins seemed to be 'comfortable' in the house and was letting the obnoxious behaviour of the Z listers wash over the top of his head. The producers never let us see the grossly offensive stuff that he said .... yes. that's called editing, so how and why are the viewing public offended!?
Is it the "viewers" that was or maybe offended or is it possibly the sponsors that would have been the ones the producers/channel are scared of offending? plenty of possibilities... |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:19.

