Originally Posted by too_much_coffee:
“I agree that vaginal sex is lower risk but there would still be plenty of women infected had this been the case.
It seems to me that he has a real bee in his bonnet about bisexual people for some reason.”
“I agree that vaginal sex is lower risk but there would still be plenty of women infected had this been the case.
It seems to me that he has a real bee in his bonnet about bisexual people for some reason.”
I've been thinking about this.
The 'gay plague' didn't provoke outrage against gays UNTIL it started spreading beyond them. Or this may be his perception, which I can understand.
There was a lot of anti homosexual feeling and irrational fear BECAUSE straight women and their children in utero began to be infected. And bisexual, or married gay men did have something to do with this.
There were other ways to get it though - blood transfusions, intravenous drug use etc.
As others have said, it took a while for people to get that it's HARD to catch, but that's a double edged sword too.
I think Ole Biggins has some warped idea that it's the BISEXUALS to blame, not the gays, when NO ONE is to blame - none of us KNEW this would happen.
The gay community got their act together and safe sex became practised very widely. And heterosexuals were also, and still are, encouraged to use condoms against stis generally.
Biggins seems defensive about homosexuals, I can understand that, and blames bi sexuals unfairly, but I don't think he said anything that can't easily be understood and discussed.




”