• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Killer Nomination.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
treetree
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Bulge_:
“Does seem like a response to who was up this week rather than it being something they had intended on doing.

If it was James, Ricky, Sam and Saira were the four up this week there'd be as much chance of there being a 'killer noms' from saved HM as there is the Pope being in the next series.”

SPOT ON
2la
10-08-2016
I actually can't believe that those 3 Morons get to make killer noms while the rest of the house don't even get a look in.

I really wish they would all liven up and give us more, They get paid ffs so it doesn't matter when they leave or if they win. JUST ENTERTAIN US!

Maybe if they did all make more of an effort to entertain then it wouldn't be all about bear and the showmances. Rennee is the only older one who has a voice in there.

Weve lost 3 oldies now including Biggins and Friday we will lose another.

BB must be desperate if they are letting these 3 do this to the house.
Darcyprincess
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by ahoyy:
“Yes, get in!! This nomination twist ensures only dullards will get nominated and a dullard will go. They will put Aubrey, Samantha and Ricky up. See ya Ricky you dullster you.”

Well if you are talking of dullards then yes Bear is still up!

Did you not listen to what Emma had to say? By the way Bear nominated Renee not Aubrey or Ricky, but don't know who Lewis or Heavy D nominated!
shelleyj89
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Darcyprincess:
“Well if you are talking of dullards then yes Bear is still up!

Did you not listen to what Emma had to say? By the way Bear nominated Renee not Aubrey or Ricky, but don't know who Lewis or Heavy D nominated!”

So much for him vowig to nominate Aubrey every time then!
Darcyprincess
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by shelleyj89:
“So much for him vowig to nominate Aubrey every time then!”

Yes, not only is the show a joke now, so is Bear!

I think he nominated Renee because she had a go at him and Chloe though!

I wouldn't be surprised if Lewis nominated Aubrey!
ghosty
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Bulge_:
“Does seem like a response to who was up this week rather than it being something they had intended on doing.

If it was James, Ricky, Sam and Saira were the four up this week there'd be as much chance of there being a 'killer noms' from saved HM as there is the Pope being in the next series.”



Again the public and fans let down by BB saving there favorites with a " last minute TWIST " they knew if the housemates voted that Bear Lewis , Chloe and Marnie would be up .maybe the rest should just walk out and leave them to it then the viewers can just switch off and leave them to it .
Why have a vote at all why dont BB just tell us who they want out and save everyone some money and no need for nominations .
I would love to see the voting figures for each eviction lets face it we only have there word for who wins or loses and i would not trust BB would you ?
Venetian
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Darcyprincess:
“Yes, not only is the show a joke now, so is Bear!

I think he nominated Renee because she had a go at him and Chloe though!

I wouldn't be surprised if Lewis nominated Aubrey!”

There are spoiler threads as to who has .been nominated. They are going by who picture appears to have turned red, but this usually proves accurate.
Nicola32
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Darcyprincess:
“Well if you are talking of dullards then yes Bear is still up!

Did you not listen to what Emma had to say? By the way Bear nominated Renee not Aubrey or Ricky, but don't know who Lewis or Heavy D nominated!”


I really hope he nominated Chloe. Either her or Bear need to go, I don't particularly want to watch them engaging in tonsil tennis every single night.

I can't see Bear going so if Chloe isn't nominated we are stuck with the pair of them.
Alrightmate
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by 2la:
“I actually can't believe that those 3 Morons get to make killer noms while the rest of the house don't even get a look in.

I really wish they would all liven up and give us more, They get paid ffs so it doesn't matter when they leave or if they win. JUST ENTERTAIN US!

Maybe if they did all make more of an effort to entertain then it wouldn't be all about bear and the showmances. Rennee is the only older one who has a voice in there.

Weve lost 3 oldies now including Biggins and Friday we will lose another.

BB must be desperate if they are letting these 3 do this to the house.”

Grant, Biggins, Saira, all in a row.
Next week will probably be James or Renee. Maybe both in the next two evictions.
Then Heavy D will be a sitting duck, who Lewis will ensure gets put up by the Squad.
Then I think Katie will be the oldest left, and I can't see many bothering to save her.

It's like BB are helping to encourage an imbalance and helping the older housemates through the door. This is not good for people who like a diverse house, and CBB is the BB where having a diverse house works very well indeed.
It seems stupid for this to be as predictable as the normal BB. It feels too much like the normal series of BB as it is.
Donna65
10-08-2016
This is all so unfair! I can't believe they could be so blatant with their fixing. Basically anyone else but those 4 are going to get picked off one by one. There's absolutely nothing the public can do about it as it's vote to save. With vote to evict at least there'd be a chance of getting one of the squad out.

How can they justify it? How can they justify only allowing those 3 to nominate? I guess they don't even give a reason, but we all know it's to protect the favourites. This is so disappointing and, in fact, quite depressing, because at least with normal nominations and a vote to evict, we get the chance to to get rid of the nasty characters. This way we have no way of changing anything.
Venetian
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Donna65:
“This is all so unfair! I can't believe they could be so blatant with their fixing. Basically anyone else but those 4 are going to get picked off one by one. There's absolutely nothing the public can do about it as it's vote to save. With vote to evict at least there'd be a chance of getting one of the squad out.

How can they justify it? How can they justify only allowing those 3 to nominate? I guess they don't even give a reason, but we all know it's to protect the favourites. This is so disappointing and, in fact, quite depressing, because at least with normal nominations and a vote to evict, we get the chance to to get rid of the nasty characters. This way we have no way of changing anything. ”

Don't upset yourself too much Donna, remember HMs in the first series all joining in to sing - "It's only a game show, it's only a game show"
Alrightmate
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Donna65:
“This is all so unfair! I can't believe they could be so blatant with their fixing. Basically anyone else but those 4 are going to get picked off one by one. There's absolutely nothing the public can do about it as it's vote to save. With vote to evict at least there'd be a chance of getting one of the squad out.

How can they justify it? How can they justify only allowing those 3 to nominate? I guess they don't even give a reason, but we all know it's to protect the favourites. This is so disappointing and, in fact, quite depressing, because at least with normal nominations and a vote to evict, we get the chance to to get rid of the nasty characters. This way we have no way of changing anything. ”

It's not like these sitting duck housemates waiting to be picked off are being punished for breaking a rule like talking about nominations.
They are being punished for putting Bear and Lewis up for eviction last time.
Bless You
10-08-2016
It's a shame those numpties are given the killer noms but it's understandable.
patricia50
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by ahoyy:
“Yes, get in!! This nomination twist ensures only dullards will get nominated and a dullard will go. They will put Aubrey, Samantha and Ricky up. See ya Ricky you dullster you.”

Dullards as you call them any day over brain dead chavs with no manners, no morals and no intellect
Darcyprincess
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Donna65:
“This is all so unfair! I can't believe they could be so blatant with their fixing. Basically anyone else but those 4 are going to get picked off one by one. There's absolutely nothing the public can do about it as it's vote to save. With vote to evict at least there'd be a chance of getting one of the squad out.

How can they justify it? How can they justify only allowing those 3 to nominate? I guess they don't even give a reason, but we all know it's to protect the favourites. This is so disappointing and, in fact, quite depressing, because at least with normal nominations and a vote to evict, we get the chance to to get rid of the nasty characters. This way we have no way of changing anything. ”

But did you listen to what else Emma had to say? She more or less said there will be a twist, the housemates will have to decide to make group decisions or single self decisions and then one will leave Friday! So maybe the group will decide who goes but not sure!
jeanoj
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by patricia50:
“Dullards as you call them any day over brain dead chavs with no manners, no morals and no intellect”

Exactly! I can't help thinking that those who like this type of housemate must have similar personalities as I cannot see any other reason for supporting them. They are obnoxious housemates and this "twist" is the final straw as far as I am concerned.
jeanoj
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Darcyprincess:
“But did you listen to what else Emma had to say? She more or less said there will be a twist, the housemates will have to decide to make group decisions or single self decisions and then one will leave Friday! So maybe the group will decide who goes but not sure!”

It might be worth carrying on watching just to see if this happens. I would laugh my socks off if they chose Marnie to go - Jason and Lateysha all over again
Etty_Dee
10-08-2016
Wait-- so a HM could get shoved out the back door ala Lateysha, not just nommed? That would be quite a twist. I'm on the verge of giving up on this fiasco too but that could keep me watching.
Donna65
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Darcyprincess:
“But did you listen to what else Emma had to say? She more or less said there will be a twist, the housemates will have to decide to make group decisions or single self decisions and then one will leave Friday! So maybe the group will decide who goes but not sure!”

I won't be holding my breath that any decision will be taken that might endanger one of the squad.
Darcyprincess
10-08-2016
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee:
“Wait-- so a HM could get shoved out the back door ala Lateysha, not just nommed? That would be quite a twist. I'm on the verge of giving up on this fiasco too but that could keep me watching.”

Yes, from what Emma just said on the repeat this arvo she said they will be making decisions on group games or singular game decisions, so it might not be all it seems! We all know that Bear likes doing his own thing so it might rebound on him and his mates!

Fingers crossed that the noms will be reversed and the people that are nominated get to choose who goes. Now that would be a corker except if Heavy nominated Marnie it might put a spanner in the works with Bear already up anyway!
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map