|
||||||||
Why is it such a big issue with the forum if reality people win |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,307
|
Quote:
Yes, I actually tried watching TOWIE but it was painful.
The only conclusion I can draw is that it's "reality" for those viewers who are really gullible and not good at spotting scripted TV.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,307
|
Quote:
There was a time when BB didn't seem like a trash reality show. So many people I know who used to watch it just don't bother now.
Too much manipulation and too much favouring of showmancers and aggressors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14,107
|
Quote:
exactly im sick to death of people going on how much better bb was on channel 4 and how it had lots of regular people
what exactly is regular people? they had the same types of pepople, they had the vile the boring the bullies, the snobby people and so on, yes the format has changed of course as its a new channel if they hate it so much stop watching. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,100
|
Quote:
most people know it is added scripted things and these reality shows dont make secret about that hence why they mention it at the begining of every episode
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14,107
|
Quote:
to me it was a trash tv show from day one it is what it is, i remember the first series with people being naked showing their breats and swearing lots and having trashy convos. you act like the royal family was on channel 4 big brother days lool.
NIcola showed her breasts and I think that was it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,307
|
Quote:
Thing is...way back in the day, BB wasn't a trash reality show. .... that's the difference. I realise it has evolved somewhat....but that's because of bad production more than anything else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14,107
|
Quote:
The funny thing is that people actually watch those shows.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,307
|
Quote:
I think you are misremembering, to be honest.
NIcola showed her breasts and I think that was it. my mum never let me watch things with nudity swearing or anything related to that sort when i was younger hence why i rmemebered in the first place. her exact words that day to me was change this trash right now you are not to watch it in her heavy cockney accent lool. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 434
|
Quote:
like i said its always been trash to me, only difference now is that there are more hms and that there are other trashy tv shows as well so people are simply exxagerating. when bb started their were only ten hms now we sometimes have up to 20 in a whole series.
If it's always been trash to you why have you watched? jeez! You're explanation of just why you think it's trash 'number of housemates' is just plain nonsense!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 456
|
Quote:
then why do you still watch it? like i said before everything you have stated is exactly what big brother has always been like, all those things you stated are exactly the type of people that have been on big brother since it started, lets face it you have to be desperate for some kind of fame to go on big brother in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Newcastle upon tyne
Posts: 4,005
|
Thy are famous for sleeping around on the tv plus drinking themselves into an early grave I prefer to see someone that has earned there place in the celebrity World and have a talent hey have used well
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14,107
|
Quote:
loool i remember being 13 years old and my mum telling me to change the channel after melanie putting her bum out in some blokes face and the bird with the short hair being carried around naked by some other bloke while he was constantly swearing and talking about sex positions so dont evan go there lool.
my mum never let me watch things with nudity swearing or anything related to that sort when i was younger hence why i rmemebered in the first place. her exact words that day to me was change this trash right now you are not to watch it in her heavy cockney accent lool. I never mentioned the swearing ? I'm sure the only breasts flashed were Nicola when she did the naked clay painting. There wasn't the obligatory snogging/feeling up/grinding/sex chat/vulgarity/ there is now. BTW how do you remember it if your mum never let you watch it ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 997
|
Quote:
most people know it is added scripted things and these reality shows dont make secret about that hence why they mention it at the begining of every episode
![]() ![]() Seriously though I dunno gg, I really don't see the attraction in watching scripted shows with poor acting but hey Hollyoaks does decent ratings so I guess there's a market. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Pit of Despair
Posts: 50,199
|
I don't care if they are from reality TV, soaps, theatre, pop, whatever. I just want to see ALL the housemates, learn a bit about them, see something interesting and perhaps have my perceptions changed about somebody.
I don't care whether there's nudity or not - I'm not shocked or bothered by nudity, nor am I by sex - I just don't want to see sex because it takes valuable minutes from the very short highlights show. If they are going to show the antics of the most lewd, then I feel they should give equal time to the other housemates, so that we can make an informed opinion about what is going on in that house - not just with one section of those living there. I want an overall view of their day, I want to know what the others are doing and talking about - whether it's boring or not, I think they deserve equal time. I will say I enjoyed Tiffany last year - she came from reality, but she won us all around because she was hysterical and shook it up a bit - but not too much; she was lovable enough to win us over. I will say I think the only person who surprised me so far from Geordie Shore was Scotty T - I actually quite liked him. I knew nothing about him before-hand except for the name of the show he was on. He seemed likeable, was amiable, didn't behave at all like I expected. He wasn't brash, all the housemates liked him. He just seemed like a (mostly) pleasant guy. So I didn't mind him winning. I find myself not minding Marnie either - when she's talking to other housemates and hanging out with them she seems likeable, there's nothing much I object to about her to be honest. I'm the opposite with Lewis - I thought he seemed okay at first, but he's got worse and worse, more big-headed as time's gone on, and I'm really not liking him much now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14,107
|
Quote:
If it's always been trash to you why have you watched? jeez! You're explanation of just why you think it's trash 'number of housemates' is just plain nonsense! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Posts: 52
|
It wasn't so bad when they first started having the structured reality people (like with Sam Faires and Mario from Towie), as they were being themselves so fair game. However, the last year or so they've been told to be the TV persona and not themselves, as it's what they're used to and will create more drama to keep them in.
Plus, due to the nature of structured reality, where they have extremely high numbers of followers, so they can keep up with the stories between the programmes, they are going to get more votes, so a high likelihood of winning. It's too fake to be interesting on a psych level so they become dull to watch. Bear winds people up to give us entertainment to watch their reactions, however, it makes it slapstick humour, like a clown pushing someone over, rather than watchung true clashes of personality in a more complex and thought provoking way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Pit of Despair
Posts: 50,199
|
Quote:
In writing or in audio for it is perhaps possible many of them can't read.
![]() Seriously though I dunno gg, I really don't see the attraction in watching scripted shows with poor acting but hey Hollyoaks does decent ratings so I guess there's a market. As Gemma Collins said, they will ask her what she is going to do and then suggest she talk about X subject whilst doing it. They don't write the script of what the discussion should be. "If I was to say I was going to the gym tomorrow and taking Arg with me to have a personal training induction. They'll be like 'right we want to follow this, so they'll say write it into a script'," she said. She added: "But when you get to the gym, they might say you know Sam Faiers is going on a date with someone else from the show tonight, so you need to talk about that with Arg." http://www.ok.co.uk/celebrity-news/4...th-about-towie |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 434
|
Quote:
He said in another post that his Mum never let him watch it ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London
Posts: 52
|
Also to add that now it's been revealed that Chloe is living with her husband in suburbia and we saw Bear had sussed the argument between Lewis and Moanie was planned as he said they have the same agent, it's all just one big fake shambles.
Hoping BB will think differently next time around. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,171
|
My only opposition to a reality TV star winning is that is gives them validation as a decent human being and support for their talentless attention seeking ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
My problem with the majority of Reality TV stars is that they have the same old predictable routine to entertain; drunken behaviour, loud gobs, having sex, talking sex/masturbation, faux showmances, low morals/high regard for themselves, always narrating the bloody storylines along for the viewers who may be to dim to connect the threads, etc. The reality TV stable is the Hollywood version of 'all actresses/actors out there who are so pumped full of plastic they start to resemble each other? They lose their originality. Uniqueness is lost and once you've seen one particular actor/actress, they ALL start to look alike' argument.
Once you've seen Towie, you've seen Geordie Shore, Made in Chelsea, Ex on the beach, etc. It's the same old tired format, the same old tired actors, the same old tired storylines, and the predictability of it all is a total piss take. I wish these reality TV stars would enter something like CBB and change my mind of the very low expectations that they have chosen to create in our culture. I would fully root for a zeleb to turn peoples expectations around, be a bloody good brilliant housemate, be the ultimate paradox, and really turn their careers around once they left the house that it goes onwards and upwards. A phoenix from the ashes, so to speak. 9 times out of 10, they NEVER do change such expectations - we can see from a mile off which way the storylines are pretty much going to go. That's the tragedy. And that is why it is all so very tedious. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: merseyside
Posts: 1,700
|
Quote:
loool i remember being 13 years old and my mum telling me to change the channel after melanie putting her bum out in some blokes face and the bird with the short hair being carried around naked by some other bloke while he was constantly swearing and talking about sex positions so dont evan go there lool.
my mum never let me watch things with nudity swearing or anything related to that sort when i was younger hence why i rmemebered in the first place. her exact words that day to me was change this trash right now you are not to watch it in her heavy cockney accent lool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,433
|
Quote:
It takes up a month or so of our lives then it's gone and we recommence for the next one.
Reality people are the stars to the audience they want watching and crucial voting. People say on here they are not celebs but they are very big ones to the above. There always an assumption that someone who was a star thirty years ago will be popular with young viewers and people don't understand why they are not. There is the default Sam fox is amazing type line thrown around for example , do people really believe that or is it just an anti popular view type line. The real problem I feel is that forum audience feel the programme should be made for those who have been around since the beginning so the 18-30s that were at the beginning are now over 30s pushing 50. It just isn't going to happen sure support the old timers but I think people should, accept the show as it is and may enjoy aspects of it. You seem sure that they market they're chasing is the young reality show one but i'm not sure that is true. Yes of course they want those viewers they want the Twitter buzz but if they've any sense they will also want the professional, affluent viewers as that is who Advertisers want to target and advertising venue is still the most important thing on any commercial tv station. To a certain extent, somebody like Sam Fox was the reality star of her day. She was famous for displaying her tits in 'The Sun' but also for her private life and was constantly in the tabloids. She used to appear on chat shows a lot, she presente shows, albeit quite badly. Think of a reality star now and have a think whether you'd be interested iin seeing what they are like, how they've grown/aged in 30 years time when you will also be 30 years older. I don't resent the younger ones being in - there should be a spread in types and that is age, nationality, sexuality, profession, experience. I do think it is a shame that we are seeing less and less of genuine human interaction (from young or older housemates) as those people whose profession is reality tv take centre stage with the antics they believe will get screen time. Re it changing, change is a part of life and sometime i, as a middle aged person accept. I don't expect it to be exactly as it was in 2000. It had changed after only 2 years and that's fair enough. If it hadn'( evolved, it would probably have died. But, we can express regret at how much it has changed. Also, i think you might be misjudging some of us older viewers. As it happens i watch 'Made In Chelsea' and various other reality shows. I have liked some of the younger housemates over the years. I liked Scotty T in January and felt he was a worthy winner. Also, some older celebs clearly are popular or they wouldn't make it through to the finale night in such shows - like Biggins or Tony Blackburn winning IAC and Barrymore coming 2nd (which was effectively a win given the circumstances that season) in CBB those years ago. I judge purely on what happens in there. What i object to is not seeing much from a lot of housemates because the show seems to think everybody just wants to watch people flashing their private areas, sticking their tongues down each others throats or kicking off just for screen time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,893
|
The whole thing about Sam Fox being a National Treasure and Marnie being a grim slapper is ludicrous. Sam Fox was scandalous in the 80s and for years she literally did nothing but get her tits out.
Marnie has never done topless modelling - who cares if she's a serial monogamist? |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,295
|
Quote:
Isn't that slightly contradictory? You're saying that older viewers should accept the younger 'celebs' but then so should the younger viewers accept the older 'celebsk and not question why somebody famous 30 years ago should be in it and what they bring to it.
You seem sure that they market they're chasing is the young reality show one but i'm not sure that is true. Yes of course they want those viewers they want the Twitter buzz but if they've any sense they will also want the professional, affluent viewers as that is who Advertisers want to target and advertising venue is still the most important thing on any commercial tv station. To a certain extent, somebody like Sam Fox was the reality star of her day. She was famous for displaying her tits in 'The Sun' but also for her private life and was constantly in the tabloids. She used to appear on chat shows a lot, she presente shows, albeit quite badly. Think of a reality star now and have a think whether you'd be interested iin seeing what they are like, how they've grown/aged in 30 years time when you will also be 30 years older. I don't resent the younger ones being in - there should be a spread in types and that is age, nationality, sexuality, profession, experience. I do think it is a shame that we are seeing less and less of genuine human interaction (from young or older housemates) as those people whose profession is reality tv take centre stage with the antics they believe will get screen time. Re it changing, change is a part of life and sometime i, as a middle aged person accept. I don't expect it to be exactly as it was in 2000. It had changed after only 2 years and that's fair enough. If it hadn'( evolved, it would probably have died. But, we can express regret at how much it has changed. Also, i think you might be misjudging some of us older viewers. As it happens i watch 'Made In Chelsea' and various other reality shows. I have liked some of the younger housemates over the years. I liked Scotty T in January and felt he was a worthy winner. Also, some older celebs clearly are popular or they wouldn't make it through to the finale night in such shows - like Biggins or Tony Blackburn winning IAC and Barrymore coming 2nd (which was effectively a win given the circumstances that season) in CBB those years ago. I judge purely on what happens in there. What i object to is not seeing much from a lot of housemates because the show seems to think everybody just wants to watch people flashing their private areas, sticking their tongues down each others throats or kicking off just for screen time. When biggins and Blackburn were winning it was a very different reality outlook in that there was no TOWIE or Geordie shore at this point. Even the jungle was the default reality show for the older celeb but the likes of Vicky Pattison winning that now as well. There probably has to be a balance how you get the balance I am not sure, although Sam fox and her holier attitude to her "career" is laughable if she would have been born 25 years later she would have been in ex on the beach etc |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:51.





