Originally Posted by claremonts:
“Hi James J:
I would also like to talk more about your ideas and thoughts too, but as it's getting late now it would most likely be better to start afresh on another day. I look forward, hopefully with other posters, to having some interesting chats about where CS could really go in the future-Claremonts”
That's great claremonts, thank you

I'm excited to hear more from you and your ideas, what you said earlier in the thread was really interesting so I can't wait to hear more of your thoughts.
Originally Posted by SS_Summer:
“A bit late to the party here, but I liked about 90% of the ideas in this letter. I think essentially what you're saying is to bring back a lot of the elements that made the show loved and most enjoyed over the years.”
Thanks a lot for your kind words! Definitely, this isn't so much about telling Kate Oates what to do (it was just a writing style for laying out my thoughts on how to make great Corrie in my personal opinion!)
Originally Posted by SS_Summer:
“And obviously not a popular opinion here anymore (surprising given the raves Kate Oates used to get here) but I loved what she did with Emmerdale, I've never enjoyed any soap more than I have Emmerdale in the last year or two and I know others who feel the same. But in that line of thought, I don't think she needs much advice. I think she's smart and has done her research and will make a lot of positive changes at Coronation Street, and I wouldn't be at all surprised to see many of the elements you mentioned come to fruition on some level.”
I agree in thinking she's a great producer and also agree on that basis she doesn't need that much advice. That's why this post wasn't advising her as such, just a writing style for laying out my thoughts. I am really optimistic and hopeful for her era on Corrie, just wanted to lay down my thoughts. I think KO is the sort who could possibly read a post like this and would not disregard the ideas immediately, so it'd be great if she clapped eyes on it and all of our ideas.
Also agree she'll have done her research. An article a few months back said she was reviewing archive footage to establish themes in old episodes of the show and I think she is very intuitive and will figure out how to add that stamp to the show in a modern age. I'm very hopeful.
Originally Posted by KornerKabin:
“This is a big one for me. Ironically, stories do interweave, but they are always lumped onto one family or group of characters. Stories are so strongly concentrated towards certain characters/families that it becomes very tiresome. The Platts, for instance, have had so much going on in the past 6 months such as Nick/Carla wedding, Callum's murder, Sarah's mental health issues, Bethany's bullying and Kylie's murder. All of these stories have intersected at the same time, while the rest of the cast languish in the sidelines. It's very imbalanced. Share the stories out among the cast more widely and then weave them together.
As well as leaving most of the cast out in the cold, the other problem with basing so many stories around one family/group of characters, is that viewers begin to question the credibility of the show. Much has been made this week on DS about how cheerfully Nick has leapt into his new business venture a couple of weeks after his brother's wife and his former lover was brutally stabbed to death.”
Agreed. While in soap it's always been the case people recover from things faster than in real life, it has been more pronounced in recent decades on the show.
The imbalance you mention is pronounced, and I really hope this improves and changes in the new tenure. It's less of an ensemble as it used to be and more tons of separate stories and character groups very loosely and lightly touching rather than a really holistic look at a community that interacts.
Originally Posted by KornerKabin:
“In terms of character interactions and community, I completely agree that the Rovers needs to be made the central meeting point in the show again, along with the corner shop and to a lesser extent the café.
Discussing ‘community’ makes me feel uncomfortable as I always envisage awkward storylines where the residents get involved a street party or a pantomime. They don’t need something OTT and outlandish, they just need to bring together characters from different backgrounds in places like the Rovers and corner shop. I sound like I’m obsessed with ‘looking back’ and in many ways I am, but Corrie always used to get characters and character interactions right, so why can’t they do that today with characters and dialogue relevant to viewers in 2016? One of the absolute staples of Corrie for the first 40 years of its life was the mixture of characters you’d get standing around the bar at the Rovers. Different characters would exchange views and opinions and be there to witness and discuss the drama or comedy when it happened. I can’t remember the last time we had a proper Rovers bar scene. The corner shop used to be used in a similar way, though interactions there were always much quicker and it was the main interchange of gossip and rumour. All we get today is scene after scene after scene that focuses on moving a plot from one point to the other.
I think a small scale ‘crisis’ would be just the thing that could bring the street together and kick start a new era of community-based interactions. I think your idea for a serious power cut or maybe even a flood could be just the thing. Right from the earliest days, Corrie has used disasters not only as a chance to have a bit of drama, but also as a means of bringing disparate characters together. They had all sorts in the 60s and 70s, from unexploded bombs and train crashes to gas leaks and warehouse fires. While the disaster itself provided the drama, the main focus of episodes was always the scenes of the residents pulling together (or in some cases not – Annie Walker got so fed up of being told what to do after the warehouse fire in 1975 that she stormed out of the evacuation centre and loudly proclaimed that she was going to: ‘do what I should’ve done hours ago, look after number 1!’) It was interactions like these that helped build individual characters and strengthen the popularity of the show.”
Your examples of the old style events that brought the community together are brilliant. I loved the Annie Walker reference - so interesting and I wasn't alive then nor did I know of that so it's great knowledge. Thanks again! People often moan about stunts like that as being sensationalist but the truth is they've been going on since the start as you say, and they're a perfect device to bring the community together and show the characters off really well.
Originally Posted by KornerKabin:
“Interactions raise another of Corrie’s issues, something which is a great point of ridicule on DS these days: every episode is based around a series of contrived ‘chance’ meetings. Last night’s episodes had half a dozen chance meetings within the first half, and Monday’s double had chance meeting after chance meeting. Viewers can see through it and it does nothing for the credibility of the show.
Make more of the day-to-day lives of the characters and build drama and comedy around that. By this I mean shopping, running errands, taking the dog for a walk. Characters need to be seen in locations where it is realistically expected they would be at a given point. Stop sending characters out on cake runs/for change/on a message or, even worse, have them appear in locations for no reason whatsoever just so a chance meeting can be contrived. For instance, if a character needs to be in a scene in the corner shop, then have them go in there to buy something specific, be explicit about what they’re doing there and then build the scene around that. To return to Tony Warren’s first episode, just remember that very first scene with Ena Sharples walking into the corner shop. She didn't just appear in the shop to suss out Florrie Lindley (though that was the basis of the scene), she had a full list of shopping that she needed (a packet of baking powder ... half a dozen fancies, and NO eclairs ... and a bottle of beach). The reason for Ena being in the shop was her shopping, but the drama came from her probing questioning of the new shop owner. Today all we get is characters appearing in locations for no apparent reason.”
It's a tricky one - I think it's down to writing. On one hand, chance interactions are bound to happen, but as you said recently they seem so contrived and deliberate that it's just cheap and lazy. The Ena example could be seen in the same light, yet I think the writing meant it really didn't get seen that way.
I think the distinction lies in the depth of the writing. It would seem totally realistic Ena was on a little shop for items for the home, at that time, and it was just coincidence the rest of the storyline unfolded; nowadays it's just miraculous that say Leanne appears on the street and collapses as Michelle turns up, as she collapses, leading Michelle to take her to hospital.
It's all a bit convenient and I think the best word to describe it is lazy. The writers need to be more inventive and to be instructed not to make any meeting contrived. Make it believable, make it possible. Otherwise it takes away from the realism. And viewers lose faith.
Thanks everyone for the great comments bang on topic, I can't wait to hear more
PS Another quick one, I want to see the show convey a real vibe in the way it's produced that it's more than just "a soap". It can have the feel and dynamism of a glossy and expensive well produced drama, it has in the past, and that really resonates with viewers. When it has the feel of a humdrum soap that's still around after years and years, it loses its charm. It is a sensational and rich show, steeped in glorious history, and demands respect; unfortunately the output often doesn't reflect that and can leave it open to ridicule. Producers should capitalise on its greatness, really show how great and simultaneously vintage and current it is. Nod to the past but also fixate on the present moment and history unfolding on screen. Be true to that. Treating it as a serial drama rather than a soap would make a subtle but important difference to the show as we see it on screen.