• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Worst twist ever
dirtyrat
12-08-2016
Seriously that was bad.

Pointless . I thought it was a game of chance 50 50 not 10-2

Now stuck with the worst showmance . Never get rid of her now.

You decide no the housemates did .

Terrible twist amateurish as well
PercyBysshe
12-08-2016
It would have been more dramatic if James had finished bottom 2.
teresagreen
12-08-2016
That was cruel.. However much people dislike Chloe, it was horrible to see.
benbeez1
12-08-2016
it was pointless because Chloe was bottom of the vote anyway (ROLLEYES)
jaycee331
12-08-2016
Do you mind, according to our DS overlords that wasn't just a twist that was a SHOCKING twist <Yawn>
starry
12-08-2016
They did it better on the non-celeb version, where people didn't see what others had chosen till decided. Quite amateur.
BabelBrook
12-08-2016
Panic change of plan when Marnie was in the bottom two?
dirtyrat
12-08-2016
Originally Posted by teresagreen:
“That was cruel.. However much people dislike Chloe, it was horrible to see.”

Yeah should of been a 50 50 chance ..

Not fair not right and not exciting at all
PercyBysshe
12-08-2016
Originally Posted by BabelBrook:
“Panic change of plan when Marnie was in the bottom two?”

They built all those props in 5 minutes.
Goggle girl
12-08-2016
The actual departure was a bit of a damp squib. Really poorly thought out.
bulldog rosie
12-08-2016
Was a rubbish twist......Would have been a lot better if it had been 50/50
claremonts
12-08-2016
Originally Posted by PercyBysshe:
“They built all those props in 5 minutes.”

😄 😄 😄
starry
12-08-2016
Originally Posted by PercyBysshe:
“They built all those props in 5 minutes.”

They can choose whenever to use a twist which they have ready, why play stupid?
atko
12-08-2016
Wasn't really a twist as such as the person who finished bottom got evicted I would put money on! Thankfully this deluded 'fake' wannabee has gone.....now for the other one!!!
hellsTinkerbell
12-08-2016
It was ridiculous and pointless.
Whatever happened to the public decides and the one with the least votes leaves the house.
09beyoncefan
13-08-2016
Yeah it felt like a last minute panicked change to keep Marnie. If it had been Chloe and James it would have been 50/50 to try and save Chloe..
DUNDEEBOY
13-08-2016
Originally Posted by 09beyoncefan:
“Yeah it felt like a last minute panicked change to keep Marnie. If it had been Chloe and James it would have been 50/50 to try and save Chloe..”

Yes I doubt the pic a housemate part was originally part of it
Reality Sucks
13-08-2016
Originally Posted by dirtyrat:
“Seriously that was bad.

Pointless . I thought it was a game of chance 50 50 not 10-2

Now stuck with the worst showmance . Never get rid of her now.

You decide no the housemates did .

Terrible twist amateurish as well”

I don't think it's any worse than Bear and Chloe grunting and gasping in the shower every night - it was getting like Groundhog Day.....

I'm just glad to get rid of one of em
clwise
13-08-2016
Was all to keep Marnie in,, they thought she would be top 2 and she wasn't.
I watch Geordie Shore and she's the least likeable of all the girls.All she does is fight with Arron and then make up with Arron, and that's all we're getting here with her and Lewis, they are both pros in front of the camera, and are playing up for it.
Bunions
13-08-2016
Originally Posted by dirtyrat:
“Yeah should of been a 50 50 chance ..

Not fair not right and not exciting at all”

It wasn't unfair, it was pointless like the OP said.

Chloe polled the least and should have just been booted - **** knows why she was given another chance but she was and she lost.
SnowStorm86
13-08-2016
The end result was nice.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map