Neither vote to save or vote to evict get the best result.

The only, actually, fair, accurate and correct way to do it would be to have two lines for each person : one to save, one to evict. Then all the save votes are added, all the evict voted are subtracted and you get a real, genuine result. The one with the least votes goes.

In a two-way vote it doesn't matter, but as soon as its a three-way vote [save or evict] the numbers are skewed. The only solution is to have two phone lines.

In future I BEG BB to have vote to save and vote to evict lines for all evictions where there are more than 2 HMs nominated.
It might cost more, but people will vote more because they know their votes will count.
Isn't that what matters? Our votes should count. I never vote now because my vote is wasted in anything but a two-way vote.

I bet it never happens.

How about a vote who is most entertaining line? Then the public could answer the direct question of who is most entertaining. Isn't that why we watch?

Some people think so, and some people don't believe it when others say 'NO, that's not why I watch it.'
I don't watch it for 'entertainment' call me old-school, but I watch it to see people's GENUINE interactions, intelligent, kind, and deep.

I also believe BB is a popularity contest and, getting back to the subject, that we should have TWO phone lines.

I was sure there was some flaw in the logic of this, but I can't seem to think of one. It'd definitely be worth a trial, even if only for one eviction in some series - just to see how they'd execute it.