DS Forums

 
 

Emma clearly doesnt like Heavy D


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16-08-2016, 23:19
An Thropologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,130
Emma asked leading question after leading question. She wanted to point out that he had been an annoyance. She wanted to point out that he wasn't really accepted or liked. She wanted to point out that Bear was using him after Chloe left. She wanted to point out that he hadn't been funny or entertaining and so on and so on.

I believe she could easily have got him talking if she hadn't been on her personal mission to belittle him. We learnt nothing and it was not a comfortable interview. Well done Emma.
Or she puts to him such questions that reflect the claims of his detractors so he gets the right of rebuttal.
An Thropologist is online now   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 16-08-2016, 23:24
Veri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
Or she puts to him such questions that reflect the claims of his detractors so he gets the right of rebuttal.
That's just redescribing the bias. Doesn't make it ok.
Veri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2016, 23:24
muggins14
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Pit of Despair
Posts: 50,196
Emma is trying to choose her words carefully about Heavy to avoid getting more shit on twitter. I'm assume that's a reference to her rant last eviction which I cheered.
It was cheered, but there were also a lot of complaints.
muggins14 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2016, 23:29
Menk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,821
Or she puts to him such questions that reflect the claims of his detractors so he gets the right of rebuttal.
But she doesn't speak for the detractors in every interview she does? That would make every interview uncomfortable - not to mention very narrow in content and uninformative.

It is only an acceptable technique to those who dislike the interviewee.
Menk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2016, 23:32
Cheri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: American Living In England
Posts: 1,234
She should be consistent. I prefer the harsher interviews but sometimes she treats certain housemates with kid gloves and other times she'll completely roast them.

She was unfairly vicious with Chloe and is often this way with young, attractive females.

Be consistent, that's all most of us want.
Because every woman that isn't 100% Polite to another woman is OMG SOOOOOOO JEALOUSSSS.

Because Emma Willis would be jealous of Chloe Trout Khan
Cheri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2016, 23:46
chameleon212
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
Because every woman that isn't 100% Polite to another woman is OMG SOOOOOOO JEALOUSSSS.

Because Emma Willis would be jealous of Chloe Trout Khan
You're only saying that because you don't like Chloe. This is the thing about the whole impartiality debate, as long as she's being disproportionately critical of a housemate you don't like it's fine. Not a problem.
chameleon212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 00:28
Cheri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: American Living In England
Posts: 1,234
You're only saying that because you don't like Chloe. This is the thing about the whole impartiality debate, as long as she's being disproportionately critical of a housemate you don't like it's fine. Not a problem.
You dumb as hell. I already posted in other threads about loving Chloe so BYE BIITCH.

I can still admit her lip game is trout-esque.
Cheri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 00:30
chameleon212
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
You dumb as hell. I already posted in other threads about loving Chloe so BYE BIITCH.

I can still admit her lip game is trout-esque.
I have no idea who you are...

All I had to go by was your justification of Chloe's interview and you calling her "Chloe Trout Khan".

And it doesn't change the fact that Emma was ludicrously harsh towards her.
chameleon212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 00:35
Cheri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: American Living In England
Posts: 1,234
I have no idea who you are...

.
So don't talk like you do know me.

You're only saying that because you don't like Chloe. This is the thing about the whole impartiality debate, as long as she's being disproportionately critical of a housemate you don't like it's fine. Not a problem.
Cheri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 00:40
chameleon212
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
So don't talk like you do know me.
I don't know you, you're just text on a computer screen. Your post made it seem like you disliked Chloe and were using that to justify Emma's impartiality, as would be the case with many people.

It doesn't change the fact that Emma's interview with Chloe (and many other young, conventionally attractive females) was INCREDIBLY harsh and condescending.
chameleon212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 00:40
trevor tiger
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22,733
She was clearly jealous of Heavy D. Emma is so predictable.
trevor tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 00:41
minxymoo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: being Blue with El Nino Torres
Posts: 11,915
It was cheered, but there were also a lot of complaints.
Im complaining.shes just plain nasty ,cruel and thinks she's a law unto herself.her ego knows no bounds.she absolutely ruins BB for me.sick of the sight of her.
minxymoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 00:42
Cheri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: American Living In England
Posts: 1,234
I don't know you, you're just text on a computer screen. Your post made it seem like you disliked Chloe and were using that to justify Emma's impartiality, as would be the case with many people.

It doesn't change the fact that Emma's interview with Chloe (and many other young, conventionally attractive females) was INCREDIBLY harsh and condescending.
In your opinion.
Cheri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 00:44
chameleon212
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
In your opinion.
Let me rephrase my post in a vernacular you might be more accustomed too...

YOU DON'T KNOW ME, I DO WHAT I WANT!!! WHATEVER!!!
chameleon212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 01:04
Cheri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: American Living In England
Posts: 1,234
Let me rephrase my post in a vernacular you might be more accustomed too...

YOU DON'T KNOW ME, I DO WHAT I WANT!!! WHATEVER!!!
But you don't know me so how do you know what I'm accustomed to? Lmao.
Cheri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 01:07
Xuri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 456
But you don't know me so how do you know what I'm accustomed to? Lmao.
I don't necessarily agree with what you've said in the thread but that made me literally laugh out loud.
Xuri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 01:09
soilhoof
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 736
Davina would have had a bit of fun with Heavy D but Emma Willis again shows her phoning-it-in snobbery. All through Heavy D and Bear's excruciating antics I *do* think they have a valid and insightful point that is laudable - annoy, make love, fight, vandalise whatever but do something for the pay packet. His comment could just as easily be directed at Willis. Maybe she just hates the fact that, the way her post pregnancy ankles and bingo wings are going, she'll look like Heavy D's mum by the end of the year.

Sizeism is the last taboo and acceptable prejudice. Heavy D grinned, boomed and bore it. Good luck to him.
soilhoof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 02:06
An Thropologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,130
She was clearly jealous of Heavy D. Emma is so predictable.
Is it his figure she covets or his career maybe?
An Thropologist is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 02:10
Xuri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 456
Is it his figure she covets or his career maybe?
His bedroom eyes.
Xuri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 04:06
savvychels
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 370
She reminded me very much of Davina!

I've seen this week people saying that Emma should be sacked and Davina should come back because she'd be impartial (in response to Emma's rant) - people seem to have idealised Davina to the point of forgetting that she would often show bias towards or against housemates much in the same vein as a viewer or a BB fan would, rather than remaining impartial at all times.

It's always been the way of BB - the presenters have never been just bland, impartial interviewers.
Yes, Rachel Rice anyone? Davina treated her shockingly. She clearly didn't feel she deserved to win. I liked Davina and think overall she was a fab presenter, but let's not go overboard on how impartial she was. (She wasn't)
savvychels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 05:29
confuddled
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,014
Some will come on here saying she should be impartial.

Should she? She's not a High Court judge.

The man is a cretin.
out of interest do you know what cretin means? seriously?
confuddled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 05:36
Scots rool
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alba Gu Brąth
Posts: 125,163
She should be consistent. I prefer the harsher interviews but sometimes she treats certain housemates with kid gloves and other times she'll completely roast them.

She was unfairly vicious with Chloe and is often this way with young, attractive females.

Be consistent, that's all most of us want.
Vicious! She hardly touched the surface with this vacuous plastic bimbo!
Scots rool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 05:48
Marc_Vu
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 205
Can you blame her? He behaved like a dumb.. I used to like him...

This series is getting old and bore, wimp/bear just ruinned everyone and everyone was so jade and just wait for the day to pass by... So pathetic and sad..
Marc_Vu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 07:03
Scarlett Berry
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,808
As I've said, my issue is consistency. If she's going to do harsh then that's fine, just apply this approach to all housemates and not just the ones you personally dislike.

And harsh interviewing does not mean lecturing which is what she did with Chloe.
That's ridiculous. Why would she be harsh on perfectly nice housemates. Simply nonsensical.

Chloe Khan was an utter disgrace on CBB. Emma's interview of her was spot on.
Scarlett Berry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2016, 07:27
DiamondDoll
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 14,007
out of interest do you know what cretin means? seriously?
You are on a mission to educate, confuddled.
DiamondDoll is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:34.