Originally Posted by cika:
“I've felt the same for the last couple or so of series, although I get more invested when the numbers are whittled down, probably to the final 10 and I can get a handle on them better. I preferred it when we saw some of what went on in the house, partucularlybwhen they were waiting to see who was coming back after an elimination. I got much more of a sense of who they were and that made it easier to care about who won. After the dreaded series 5 and Emma Dean, even though they backtracked and went back to having people who could actually cook it seems to have lost something for me. I do still enjoy it but I don't watch it with my full attention any more
It could just be MasterChef fatigue, of course. Nothing stays fresh for viewers for ever, I suppose.”
I think that my problem is that there are still quite a few in it that shouldn't be. Brett should've gone already, as should Mimi (she's good but she panics too much). We've also had a lot of dead wood and there's the prospect that any one of them could come back (Conn, Theresa, Jimmy, Charlie) when we have redemption week - and face it, that will happen.
I think that they need to shake it up a bit - do something a little bit different, give them more of a challenge. One thing that I love about Top Chef (yep, I really do watch
a lot of cookery programmes) is the pop-up restaurant week. I think that this would be a good test for them. I wouldn't say that it's got easier over time (because it hasn't), but I get the uncomfortable feeling that a lot of these contestants spend a couple of years practising before they audition, so we really are seeing incredible improvement in the standard of competitor year on year.
I want Matt to win - for me he's a standout in teams, and on his own. Think another issue I have is that there are more I don't like this year than do.