• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
BB deciding to not show the Sam eye incident?
<<
<
2 of 6
>>
>
exodus2u
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by RonanM:
“They couldn't show it because they cannot give Bear another warning!”

This.

Just how many warnings has he had?................Oh we'll find out next week
peterstone
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by Shantan:
“I thought she said the contact incident was yesterday and the pie in Aubury's face was today?!”

She did.

It was quite clear
PaleHorse
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by Fairy Wings:
“She knew & you must surely have understood that Sam was referring to when it SHOULD have been shown. She said, incase you weren't paying attention, that it happened yesterday. 😁”

No, I'm pretty sure that's not how it went down.

And if you'd like to be any more patronising, perhaps you'd also like to kiss my arse?
NathalieR
23-08-2016
If it happened yesterday there might be a chance we see it tomorrow as today's show was mainly about the eviction - I won't hold my breath though
Fairy Wings
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by willywonker:
“They also didn't show Sam having a panic attack because she had been nominated, they also didn't show Jame's having an asthma attack.

Personally, you have to be rather sick to want to see someone have an accident with an eye injury, lots of emergency programs on TV for the gory ones on here.”

Two different scenarios. There's personal medical problems versus inflicted by another HM medical problem.

I bet you'd be si going from a different hymn sheet had Bear been poked in the eye with a wet stick by a HM.

They happily showed Lewis throwing a drink over Heavy
Fairy Wings
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by PaleHorse:
“No, I'm pretty sure that's not how it went down.

And if you'd like to be any more patronising, perhaps you'd also like to kiss my arse? ”

Just saying 😁
Eve Elle
23-08-2016
Obviously they didn't want Bear to look bad on eviction night. Might have affected his vote causing him to get evicted.
willywonker
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by Fairy Wings:
“Two different scenarios. There's personal medical problems versus inflicted by another HM medical problem.

I bet you'd be si going from a different hymn sheet had Bear been poked in the eye with a wet stick by a HM.

They happily showed Lewis throwing a drink over Heavy ”


Why do you have to see it? Don't you believe Sam ?
Wee Tinkers
23-08-2016
He wouldn't have meant to hurt her eye. A squirty water trick usually passes off without an injury but what I'm noticing about all these eviction interviews is a theme of stuff being revealed that we've not seen.

I know it's not feasible to see everything but this series must be the worst for having the tightest agenda driven edit I've seen.

Such a shame because most of these HMs coming out are revealing interesting stuff - stuff a lot of of us would love to have seen....and they come across as far from boring.

The days of the HLs being a fair reflection of the days events are long gone, I get that, but I've never known it quite as skewed as this.

What they're saying and we what we see on LF just doesn't fit with the HLs at all. The HLs are actually pretty pointless to me now.
Littlegreen42
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by willywonker:
“They also didn't show Sam having a panic attack because she had been nominated, they also didn't show Jame's having an asthma attack.

Personally, you have to be rather sick to want to see someone have an accident with an eye injury, lots of emergency programs on TV for the gory ones on here.”

You can't see the whole picture as you support Bear no matter what.

But had this been shown Bear would have had to receive his final warning and therefore no more Bear show and no publicity for the other reality tack.
Flo71
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by Fairy Wings:
“Two different scenarios. There's personal medical problems versus inflicted by another HM medical problem.

I bet you'd be si going from a different hymn sheet had Bear been poked in the eye with a wet stick by a HM.

They happily showed Lewis throwing a drink over Heavy ”

Hmmm anyone got a wet stick and a volunteer to poke him with it
muggins14
23-08-2016
This CBB has certainly been one that's more about what we haven't been shown than what we have. It seems to be the theme this year!
patsylimerick
23-08-2016
Some people only hear what they want to hear.

Sam very clearly said that she warned him before that nothing better go in her eye BECAUSE as a contact lens wearer she knows that water in the eye could cause permanent damage. And it sounds like that's almost what happened. He assured her it wouldn't and then it did - necessitating a visit to a medic and an eyepatch for the rest of the day.

He's a bloody menace.
heresitting
23-08-2016
Wouldn't like to be a video editor on CBB this evening... they'll be under lock and key until they produce a "funny" version of the Sam and Bear water incident...
ABCZYX
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“You can't see the whole picture as you support Bear no matter what.

But had this been shown Bear would have had to receive his final warning and therefore no more Bear show and no publicity for the other reality tack.”

Yes, I think that's true.
MargMck
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by Flo71:
“Hmmm anyone got a wet stick and a volunteer to poke him with it”

Me, me, me... can it be a sharp stick please, perhaps dipped in pepper sauce?
willywonker
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“You can't see the whole picture as you support Bear no matter what.

But had this been shown Bear would have had to receive his final warning and therefore no more Bear show and no publicity for the other reality tack.”

You don't suppose Sam has exaggerated the incident then?

She said her contact lens had been pushed to the back of her eye, you do know that's impossible?
matrix2021
23-08-2016
I can't understand why Channel 5 are enabling his behaviour AND hiding yet more antics that will go against him. It's so obvious they are now giving him positive edits to be the overall winner.

He has acted like a little child, bullied, harassed, intimidated and antagonized his fellow housemates with his antics all season long. He has tried at every single attempt to gain attention and camera time, even when whatever's happening doesn't involve him. And yet this is being portrayed as 'entertaining' and 'hilarious'.

Not only however is he a horrible housemate but he's a horrible person as well. He comes on national TV, cheats on his girlfriend, and then shows no remorse when she pours her heart out in front of him - and the public are somehow supporting this?

Again, it's pathetic Channel 5 are trying to present him as their winner, by making the highlight shows extremely Bear heavy and editing out bits that show what an absolute monster he is. Obviously they really want the viewing figures to crossover to Ex on the Beach
Moomin STFC
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by willywonker:
“They also didn't show Sam having a panic attack because she had been nominated, they also didn't show Jame's having an asthma attack.

Personally, you have to be rather sick to want to see someone have an accident with an eye injury, lots of emergency programs on TV for the gory ones on here.”

Personally you have to be rather sick to enjoy Bear making people's lives a misery in there. there are lots of programmes with brainless people behaving like idiots on TV for those on here who like such nonsense.
smoggieboon
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by willywonker:
“You don't suppose Sam has exaggerated the incident then?

She said her contact lens had been pushed to the back of her eye, you do know that's impossible?”

Guess you didn't gain any qualifications in Anatomy... A contact lens can move behind the eye, over the top, underneath, and either left or right. Of course it won't go directly behind the eye, because of the optic nerve. but it will go far enough to cause irritation and problems.
IWasBored
23-08-2016
Just an accident and prank that went wrong
M_C3
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by benbeez1:
“the producers just want it to be the Bear show every minute of the highlights 24/7, anyone else doing anything slightly interesting gets edited out in favor of the Bear show ZZZZZ”

Exactly! Everything is presented in way Bear to win.
Wee Tinkers
23-08-2016
Originally Posted by patsylimerick:
“Some people only hear what they want to hear.

Sam very clearly said that she warned him before that nothing better go in her eye BECAUSE as a contact lens wearer she knows that water in the eye could cause permanent damage. And it sounds like that's almost what happened. He assured her it wouldn't and then it did - necessitating a visit to a medic and an eyepatch for the rest of the day.

He's a bloody menace.”

Aah, I did not hear that bit.

Tbh I think the HMs see exactly what he gets up to - yes, he is a menace - and more to the point see what he gets away with. They aren't stupid; I'm sure they have twigged that he's their star turn - particularly if they know he's from one of their mtv shows (that they are promoting atm) - and that is why people don't really tackle him. They've given up and almost collude with it. We know it's the bear show, I'm sure they know too.
Wee Tinkers
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by matrix2021:
“I can't understand why Channel 5 are enabling his behaviour AND hiding yet more antics that will go against him. It's so obvious they are now giving him positive edits to be the overall winner.

He has acted like a little child, bullied, harassed, intimidated and antagonized his fellow housemates with his antics all season long. He has tried at every single attempt to gain attention and camera time, even when whatever's happening doesn't involve him. And yet this is being portrayed as 'entertaining' and 'hilarious'.

Not only however is he a horrible housemate but he's a horrible person as well. He comes on national TV, cheats on his girlfriend, and then shows no remorse when she pours her heart out in front of him - and the public are somehow supporting this?

Again, it's pathetic Channel 5 are trying to present him as their winner, by making the highlight shows extremely Bear heavy and editing out bits that show what an absolute monster he is. Obviously they really want the viewing figures to crossover to Ex on the Beach”

That is exactly it. People think they're voting for a legend, I reckon they're voting for a media cross-promotional tool. Tool being the operative word.
Lee_Bo
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by matrix2021:
“I can't understand why Channel 5 are enabling his behaviour AND hiding yet more antics that will go against him. It's so obvious they are now giving him positive edits to be the overall winner.

He has acted like a little child, bullied, harassed, intimidated and antagonized his fellow housemates with his antics all season long. He has tried at every single attempt to gain attention and camera time, even when whatever's happening doesn't involve him. And yet this is being portrayed as 'entertaining' and 'hilarious'.

Not only however is he a horrible housemate but he's a horrible person as well. He comes on national TV, cheats on his girlfriend, and then shows no remorse when she pours her heart out in front of him - and the public are somehow supporting this?

Again, it's pathetic Channel 5 are trying to present him as their winner, by making the highlight shows extremely Bear heavy and editing out bits that show what an absolute monster he is. Obviously they really want the viewing figures to crossover to Ex on the Beach”

Always nice to see some common sense

It's very concerning that they're completely omitting entire events that show Stephen in a bad light. This is more than obvious that they are deliberately manipulating the public into voting a certain way.
I'm sure Stephen and Marnie trying to pull down the Christmas tree was not seen as fun and games by the rest of the house and he had already received several warnings about the fixtures and fittings but it was edited into a fun little segment with happy music to make it seem like it was all fun and games.

When the game fixing is this blatant I'm not sure it even stays in legal territory (when a paying, voting public is involved). It's the public who pay their money to vote and they should be aware of all the facts in order to make their decision.

Anything less is subterfuge.
<<
<
2 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map