• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Celebrity Big Brother fix scandal: Show bosses sly bid to crown Stephen Bear the winn
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
shraine
24-08-2016
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...-winner-result
JamesLaFleur
24-08-2016
Tabloid story true for once? Shocker.
vald
24-08-2016
Wouldn't surprise me. The other housemates certainly seem to know he's untouchable.
gentleguy
24-08-2016
ive never understood the whole fix thing. i can undersyand if producers want to keep certain hms longer than others but why would they fix it for a certain hm to win??
KazzyD
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by gentleguy:
“ive never understood the whole fix thing. i can undersyand if producers want to keep certain hms longer than others but why would they fix it for a certain hm to win??”

Because they are working on a show for him ..........

http://www.tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv...lity-show.html
danielleh
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by gentleguy:
“ive never understood the whole fix thing. i can undersyand if producers want to keep certain hms longer than others but why would they fix it for a certain hm to win??”

Bear is an asset to Viacom. They've used him to promote another one of their shows. If he was removed (as he should have been), their product loses value.
aurichie
24-08-2016
They can do what they want as long as they don't fix the actual phone votes. It's as simple as that really. And it is not a fix, because the public ultimately decides the winner even if you think the footage has been heavily slanted towards helping one particular housemate win. The power still rests with those calling up and voting to choose the winner.
Kopite1763
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by aurichie:
“They can do what they want as long as they don't fix the actual phone votes. It's as simple as that really. And it is not a fix, because the public ultimately decides the winner even if you think the footage has been heavily slanted towards helping one particular housemate win. The power still rests with those calling up and voting to choose the winner.”

But you are not being shown a true representation of events.

It's like a jury being given the defence version but not the prosecutions version
Marc_Vu
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by danielleh:
“Bear is an asset to Viacom. They've used him to promote another one of their shows. If he was removed (as he should have been), their product loses value.”

That is so so so sad... Promoting bad manner poor behavior ...
spkx
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by gentleguy:
“ive never understood the whole fix thing. i can undersyand if producers want to keep certain hms longer than others but why would they fix it for a certain hm to win??”

Now that Viacom own Channel 5 there is a major incentive for people like Bear to stay in longer.

(For those that don't know, Viacom own Channel 5 and MTV, who make Bear's other show Ex On The Beach as well as Geordie Shore and The Valleys (the show Lateysha was on))
ahoyy
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by Kopite1763:
“But you are not being shown a true representation of events.

It's like a jury being given the defence version but not the prosecutions version”

It's not real. It's a tv show filmed in a tv studio. I's not an audition for Prime Minister.
J Swift
24-08-2016
Firstly, if it's in the Daily Star, it's definitely nonsense

I mentioned on here before, one of my friends was on I'm a Celebrity in about 2014, and every day the Daily Star made up a new story about her, just based on Instagram photos and someone's warped imagination

Originally Posted by KazzyD:
“Because they are working on a show for him ..........

http://www.tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv...lity-show.html”

But this is the best news I've heard in ages

I was quite against the way it felt like they fixed it for Rylan to win, because they wanted him to become a presenter (if that's even true .. but people were saying it at the time)

How wrong was I? He'd done a great job
ahoyy
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by spkx:
“Now that Viacom own Channel 5 there is a major incentive for people like Bear to stay in longer.

(For those that don't know, Viacom own Channel 5 and MTV, who make Bear's other show Ex On The Beach as well as Geordie Shore and The Valleys (the show Lateysha was on))”

So why didn't Lateysha win?
Landon3333
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by Marc_Vu:
“That is so so so sad... Promoting bad manner poor behavior ...”

More preferable than promoting the stupid Americans.
Jennyuk
24-08-2016
The plot thicken's

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...viction-Friday
Joyce_Downie
24-08-2016
they did it with Helen
Skyrah
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by ahoyy:
“So why didn't Lateysha win?”

errrrrm cos Jason gave her the boot, it wasn't scripted, so BB had no control over it
rsefitpro07
24-08-2016
Of course its been fixed for Bear. Its obvious!

I find it laughable it has taken a tabloid so long to work that one out. Bear will win, everyone will complain to Ofcom. Big Brother will cover there tracks and get away with it.

Nothing can be done, and the problem is that he has a huge twitter following, mainly tweeny girls who in there fantasy world think they actually stand a chance of getting with him?

The only way to stop Bear is by not voting for him but that isn't going to happen. Its been fixed up good and proper.

Do you really think any other housemate in that house will collect more votes than Bear?, The shows been all about Bear he has been thrown at us every single night for 4 weeks!

It has in my view ruined this series but the producers don't care they will just carry on and keep on doing it!
AndyS2992
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by aurichie:
“They can do what they want as long as they don't fix the actual phone votes. It's as simple as that really. And it is not a fix, because the public ultimately decides the winner even if you think the footage has been heavily slanted towards helping one particular housemate win. The power still rests with those calling up and voting to choose the winner.”

You do realize the producers have access to phones too that they can use to vote multiple times and the production company will pay for it out of the budget if they really want particualr HMs to stay. Quite simple really.
willywonker
24-08-2016
Daily Star, great source for a true story.
oilcat
24-08-2016
The Daily Star
all_night
24-08-2016
Although the Daily Star is known for not being entirely honest, a lot including myself have come to the conclusion that C5/BB want Bear to win and will go to any length to make that happen.
Mamajenco
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by AndyS2992:
“You do realize the producers have access to phones too that they can use to vote multiple times and the production company will pay for it out of the budget if they really want particualr HMs to stay. Quite simple really.”

This .....
I've thought for a long time this is what is happening. All the Viacom employees voting for Bear until he's safe ....
wotnot
24-08-2016
Originally Posted by gentleguy:
“ive never understood the whole fix thing. i can undersyand if producers want to keep certain hms longer than others but why would they fix it for a certain hm to win??”

A sponsorship deal with a production company possibly?
NathalieR
24-08-2016
I wouldnt be surprised if this article is true.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map