• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
We were not shown Bear injuring Sam.
zolug
24-08-2016
BB well and truly brushed that incident under the carpet ,more protection of the henious Bear.
aurichie
24-08-2016
They've already explained they didn't have time to cram the footage in due to it being a live eviction show last night.
r.a.i.n.b.o.w
24-08-2016
Yep. Loved the way Sam wouldn't be silenced by Emma during the interview, just showed exactly how much we aren't seeing during this year's Big Bear Show.
Wainy84
24-08-2016
BB are probably running out of time to add it to the warmings before the show starts so didn't bother showing it.
cah
24-08-2016
They cut lots of things OP ,Tonight ,They cut Aubrey telling Bear that all the producers can't stand bear and have told the others he's nothing but an Asshole ,They also cut the part where she called Marnie a little C**T ......so covered for her quite a bit tonight
marshey
24-08-2016
The show has been edited in favour of bear for the last few weeks. The obvious bias is pretty disgraceful really!
benbeez1
24-08-2016
what a f*****g surprise
heresitting
24-08-2016
The bias is terrible...

the problem is whatever we try to do now CH5 will win. If there is no anti-Bear vote then the manipulation has gone the way they wanted. If Bear doesn't win it will be because of masses of votes on the others - which results in higher revenue for CH5.

As Aubrey said, he will have a very short to no shelf-life (aka Marc/k/q) and CH5 will want nothing to do with him.

My friend's daughter has just discovered politics and is a raving socialist (she's young though....) and all about employment rights and the evils of capitalism.... all while dressed head to foot in Primark...

Bless
Aimee
24-08-2016
We already knew they'd whitewashed it as it happened Thursday. That's why so many of us were talking about it today.
Disgusting editing in favour of Bear.
I'm certain if it HAD been shown bear would lose a lot of votes.
Morbid
24-08-2016
I think literally all we saw concerning anything relating to it was a couple of seconds of Sam walking in wearing dark glasses at the beginning...?
Bless You
24-08-2016
BB want ya coinage.

Was Sam protecting the others against bear and we weren't shown it? I'm sure Aubrey said something along those lines.
Sylvia
25-08-2016
I'm just hanging onto the (probably vain) hope that neither Bear nor Marnie will win.
CLL Dodge
25-08-2016
We only have Sam's account of it.
kitkat1971
25-08-2016
Originally Posted by aurichie:
“They've already explained they didn't have time to cram the footage in due to it being a live eviction show last night.”

And what was so fascinating in the highlights they did show which took precedence over it? I honestly can't remember which indicates it was boring.

If that is really true, there wasn't time, maybe they should have had a 5 minute section in today's, explaining it couldn't be included last night.

Sorry, but I'd say a housemate injuring another housemate to such an extent they required medical treatment and we're in pain, needing an eyepatch for hours, even if it wasn't intended, is pretty important and might have given more context to the idea that Sam would steal his mask to get at him.

Also, it makes him shoving a pie in Aubrey's face worse when a prank had resulted in injury only the day before.

Whether it actually is bias or not, it seems like bias and I hope it backfires on BB and Bear with him not winning.

He will though, sadly.

I see he is behaving like a toddler again during their Awards show on the live feed.
kitkat1971
25-08-2016
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“We only have Sam's account of it.”

Katie didn't contradict her which surely she would have if Sam hadn't been injured, received medical attention, had to wear an eyepatch etc.

And, if Sam was lying or exaggerating it, even more reason for BB to show the incident so we could judge for ourselves rather than Bear being made out to have done something harmful to another housemate and it being covered up.
gkabc
25-08-2016
Originally Posted by heresitting:
“The bias is terrible...

the problem is whatever we try to do now CH5 will win. If there is no anti-Bear vote then the manipulation has gone the way they wanted. If Bear doesn't win it will be because of masses of votes on the others - which results in higher revenue for CH5.

As Aubrey said, he will have a very short to no shelf-life (aka Marc/k/q) and CH5 will want nothing to do with him.

My friend's daughter has just discovered politics and is a raving socialist (she's young though....) and all about employment rights and the evils of capitalism.... all while dressed head to foot in Primark...

Bless”

It's pretty amazing that anyone would piss their hard earned money into the C5 sewer under any circumstances. Who wins makes no difference, and never has. I have feelings about individual personalities on the show, but why would anyone care about the outcome? Especially when there is no doubt about the manipulation. There is no "getting back at C5".

I did love that Bear was rattled over the mask. It was a fantastic example of Bear being a hypocrite.
acid rain
25-08-2016
Originally Posted by heresitting:
“The bias is terrible...

the problem is whatever we try to do now CH5 will win. If there is no anti-Bear vote then the manipulation has gone the way they wanted. If Bear doesn't win it will be because of masses of votes on the others - which results in higher revenue for CH5.

As Aubrey said, he will have a very short to no shelf-life (aka Marc/k/q) and CH5 will want nothing to do with him.

My friend's daughter has just discovered politics and is a raving socialist (she's young though....) and all about employment rights and the evils of capitalism.... all while dressed head to foot in Primark...

Bless”


Marc's shelf life was short because he went to America to become a lab technician. He had no intention of being a professional Z lister.

Maybe your friend's daughter wears Primark because it's all she can afford?
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map