Originally Posted by Granny McSmith:
“Get over it.”
“Get over it.”
Oh dear.
How eloquent. How insightful. How amusing.
Perhaps it is time to close this thread.
Peter Davison Makes a Complete Prat of Himself
3 of 3
Let's just not talk about politics and talk about Monty Python instead. The latter doesn't get everybody angry unless your pulse is slipping.
Trust me, you don't want to do that. That's like depending on Michael Bay not to blow up a street full of petrol stations, or on Cheryl Cole to not make your daughter cry.
Originally Posted by Granny McSmith:
“I've only read Boz's précis of PD's remarks, so I'm dependent on him being accurate, but I think that calling 17 million people xenophobic is rather indicative of a lack of perceptive analysis.
I wouldn't call PD a plonker for it, though. I'd just think it.”
“I've only read Boz's précis of PD's remarks, so I'm dependent on him being accurate, but I think that calling 17 million people xenophobic is rather indicative of a lack of perceptive analysis.
I wouldn't call PD a plonker for it, though. I'd just think it.”
Trust me, you don't want to do that. That's like depending on Michael Bay not to blow up a street full of petrol stations, or on Cheryl Cole to not make your daughter cry.
Originally Posted by Wong_Billabong:
“Are you being serious”
“Are you being serious”
I'm never serious.
Originally Posted by Dogmatix:
“Oh dear.
How eloquent. How insightful. How amusing.
Perhaps it is time to close this thread.”
“Oh dear.
How eloquent. How insightful. How amusing.
Perhaps it is time to close this thread.”
You really mean you didn't think it was eloquent, insightful or amusing, don't you? It's all right, you can be honest. I won't be very hurt.
Originally Posted by Lord Smexy:
“.
Trust me, you don't want to do that. That's like depending on Michael Bay not to blow up a street full of petrol stations, or on Cheryl Cole to not make your daughter cry.”
“.
Trust me, you don't want to do that. That's like depending on Michael Bay not to blow up a street full of petrol stations, or on Cheryl Cole to not make your daughter cry.”
Boz is sometimes sound, I find. Unlike Cheryl Cole.
Originally Posted by Lord Smexy:
“Let's just not talk about politics and talk about Monty Python instead. The latter doesn't get everybody angry unless your pulse is slipping.
Trust me, you don't want to do that. That's like depending on Michael Bay not to blow up a street full of petrol stations, or on Cheryl Cole to not make your daughter cry.”
“Let's just not talk about politics and talk about Monty Python instead. The latter doesn't get everybody angry unless your pulse is slipping.
Trust me, you don't want to do that. That's like depending on Michael Bay not to blow up a street full of petrol stations, or on Cheryl Cole to not make your daughter cry.”
Point out where I have been inaccurate then. I don't think anyone would trust you.
Originally Posted by Boz_Lowdownl:
“Point out where I have been inaccurate then.”
“Point out where I have been inaccurate then.”
Oh, that's easy. Best example: "Peter Davison makes a complete prat of himself" you say as you proceed to make a complete prat of yourself. But don't let me stop you, you're a very quotable fellow.
Originally Posted by Lord Smexy:
“Oh, that's easy. Best example: "Peter Davison makes a complete prat of himself" you say as you proceed to make a complete prat of yourself. But don't let me stop you, you're a very quotable fellow.”
“Oh, that's easy. Best example: "Peter Davison makes a complete prat of himself" you say as you proceed to make a complete prat of yourself. But don't let me stop you, you're a very quotable fellow.”
Like I thought, just more hot air from you with nothing to substantiate it. You really are tiresome. How about making a case why Davison didn't make a prat of himself. But that would take a bit of effort.
Originally Posted by Boz_Lowdownl:
“Like I thought, just more hot air from you with nothing to substantiate it. You really are tiresome. How about making a case why Davison didn't make a prat of himself. But that would take a bit of effort.”
“Like I thought, just more hot air from you with nothing to substantiate it. You really are tiresome. How about making a case why Davison didn't make a prat of himself. But that would take a bit of effort.”
Of course, it's the great question scholars and psychologists have been debating for years: Is Peter Davison really a prat? I, for one, think the silly tosser should flog himself, thinking he's allowed to answer questions about his opinion, just because he pretended to be that Doctor Who bloke for a few years. What happened to the golden days, when actors didn't speak unless spoken to and just made fun of each other's weight on Twitter?
Originally Posted by Lord Smexy:
“Of course, it's the great question scholars and psychologists have been debating for years: Is Peter Davison really a prat? I, for one, think the silly tosser should flog himself, thinking he's allowed to answer questions about his opinion, just because he pretended to be that Doctor Who bloke for a few years. What happened to the golden days, when actors didn't speak unless spoken to and just made fun of each other's weight on Twitter?”
“Of course, it's the great question scholars and psychologists have been debating for years: Is Peter Davison really a prat? I, for one, think the silly tosser should flog himself, thinking he's allowed to answer questions about his opinion, just because he pretended to be that Doctor Who bloke for a few years. What happened to the golden days, when actors didn't speak unless spoken to and just made fun of each other's weight on Twitter?”
I remember the era of the silent films*, when actors couldn't speak at all.
When they did eventually learn to speak, it was all downhill afterwards. We realised these strong, silent god-like creatures were all, in fact, complete prats.
*Before anyone asks, I don't really remember this, I'm not that old - I just said that for (hopefully) comic effect.
Originally Posted by Granny McSmith:
“I've only read Boz's précis of PD's remarks, so I'm dependent on him being accurate, but I think that calling 17 million people xenophobic is rather indicative of a lack of perceptive analysis.
I wouldn't call PD a plonker for it, though. I'd just think it.”
“I've only read Boz's précis of PD's remarks, so I'm dependent on him being accurate, but I think that calling 17 million people xenophobic is rather indicative of a lack of perceptive analysis.
I wouldn't call PD a plonker for it, though. I'd just think it.”
Maybe if you don't know what you are talking about you shouldn't comment.
He certainly doesn't call 17 million people xenophobic and acknowledges that people can have well argued reasons for wanting to leave the EU.
It's a great interview, with Davison very interesting on lots of different subjects.
Originally Posted by gslam2:
“Maybe if you don't know what you are talking about you shouldn't comment.
He certainly doesn't call 17 million people xenophobic and acknowledges that people can have well argued reasons for wanting to leave the EU.
It's a great interview, with Davison very interesting on lots of different subjects.”
“Maybe if you don't know what you are talking about you shouldn't comment.
He certainly doesn't call 17 million people xenophobic and acknowledges that people can have well argued reasons for wanting to leave the EU.
It's a great interview, with Davison very interesting on lots of different subjects.”
Good. He isn't a prat then.
Originally Posted by Boz_Lowdownl:
“Oh dear. Maybe it would help if you read previous posts before making sarcastic comments. Just a suggestion. Nobody has ever suggested that they can't express opinions.”
“Oh dear. Maybe it would help if you read previous posts before making sarcastic comments. Just a suggestion. Nobody has ever suggested that they can't express opinions.”
I did read your posts. My comment was a direct response to the words you chose to describe Colin Baker and Peter Davison.
3 of 3
