so obviously no-one in here has seen much of Barca or Chile these last few seasons. Bravo has been pretty poor since joining City, but to claim he isn't a good keeper - or even a keeper at all - is clearly silly.
Originally Posted by Pee: “so obviously no-one in here has seen much of Barca or Chile these last few seasons. Bravo has been pretty poor since joining City, but to claim he isn't a good keeper - or even a keeper at all - is clearly silly.”
He really isn't that much of an improvement on Hart, certainly not worth all the hassle that went with trying to sign him at Hart's expense.
Originally Posted by Pee: “so obviously no-one in here has seen much of Barca or Chile these last few seasons. Bravo has been pretty poor since joining City, but to claim he isn't a good keeper - or even a keeper at all - is clearly silly.”
He looks a good keeper with chile, certainly doesn't with city
Originally Posted by batdude_uk1: “He really isn't that much of an improvement on Hart, certainly not worth all the hassle that went with trying to sign him at Hart's expense.”
Originally Posted by Pee: “16 goals in 15 games against (the best) English teams for Messi, and still people doubt whether he would be able to perform in the Premier League.”
Originally Posted by Pee: “16 goals in 15 games against (the best) English teams for Messi, and still people doubt whether he would be able to perform in the Premier League.”
Originally Posted by Pee: “16 goals in 15 games against (the best) English teams for Messi, and still people doubt whether he would be able to perform in the Premier League.”
I don't think the "but can he do it on a cold Wednesday night in Stoke?" stuff is to be taken seriously.
Originally Posted by Jim De Ville: “Which people?”
Originally Posted by Jamesp84: “Who's doing that?”
I didn't say it was anyone in here. as recently as this past weekend when Pep was jokingly talking about bringing Messi to City, I heard/read opinions along the lines of him not having the bottle to leave Barca for the PL, he wouldn't have it as "easy" as he does in Spain etc
Can anyone explain why a Napoli goal was disallowed?
Napoli were attacking down the right wing when one of their team strayed into an offside position at the far post but not interfering with play. The ball was crossed into the penalty area where a Besiktas defender struck out a leg to try and kick the ball out for a corner, only succeeding to deflect the ball onto the bar and subsequently dropped to the 'offside' forward to score with an overhead kick. The goal was not given for offside but l thought if the ball was played by an opponent, the forward was then 'onside'.